Three-stage operations transformation pipeline — process discovery (SIPOC), digital transformation assessment, then automation-ready process redesign — to turn pain points into builder-ready blueprints.
Scanned 9/19/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add peter-tu-zynkr/zynkr-skill-builder --skill operations-transformation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Operations Transformation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/peter-tu-zynkr-operations-transformation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: operations-transformation
sheetId: "3.10"
description: "Three-stage operations transformation pipeline — process discovery (SIPOC), digital transformation assessment, then automation-ready process redesign — to turn pain points into builder-ready blueprints."
category: operations
project: operations-transformation
platform: claude
status: Done
author: Peter Tu
input: "A client-described inefficient or unclear business process, ideally with prior discovery context from consult-discovery"
process: "Stage 1 SIPOC mapping → Stage 2 automation suitability diagnosis (four-quadrant + ROI) → Stage 3 sub-task / system-layer / MVP-stack redesign"
output: "SIPOC table, diagnostic table with tech recommendations and ROI, and a builder-ready redesign blueprint with MVP stack"
synergy:
- "operations-flow-optimization"
type: agent
skills: ["operations-process-discovery", "operations-automation-validation", "operations-process-redesign"]
house-style: bound
---
# Operations Transformation
```bash
npx skills add https://github.com/peter-tu-zynkr/zynkr-skill-builder --skill operations-transformation
```
Turn an inefficient business process into a builder-ready automation blueprint through three sequential stages. Use this skill after `consult-discovery` (or whenever you already have a clear pain point) and you want to design the operational fix end-to-end before handing to an engineer.
---
## Step 1 — Collect inputs
Ask the user for:
1. **Pain-point description** — the inefficient or unclear process to redesign
2. (Optional) `STAGE1_SUMMARY` / `STAGE2_SUMMARY` from `consult-discovery` if available
3. The business outcome they want from the transformation (cost / speed / quality / scale)
Store as `PROCESS_BRIEF`.
---
## Step 2 — Stage 1: Process Discovery / SIPOC mapping (subagent)
Display:
```
---------------------------------------------
Stage 1: Process Mining — build the SIPOC map
---------------------------------------------
```
Launch the `operations-process-discovery` agent (`./agents/operations-process-discovery.md`) using the Agent tool, passing `PROCESS_BRIEF`.
The agent walks through:
1. End-to-end process mapping (main stages, owners)
2. Supplier and Customer per step (one question at a time)
3. Agent-generated Input/Output assumptions
Store the final SIPOC table as `SIPOC_TABLE`.
Ask:
```
Does this SIPOC map look right? (Yes / Adjust)
```
> **Optional Stage 1.5 — quick lean pass on a tangled as-is.** If `SIPOC_TABLE` is too messy to diagnose (duplicated steps, unclear loops), you may invoke `operations-flow-optimization` here for a quick cleanup before Stage 2. The canonical ordering pass, however, runs AFTER Stage 3 — see Stage 3.5 below (course Ch5 §5.5.2: assess first, redesign, then optimize the ordering of the re-chained flow).
---
## Step 3 — Stage 2: Digital Transformation Assessment (subagent)
Display:
```
---------------------------------------------
Stage 2: Diagnose automation suitability
---------------------------------------------
```
Launch the `operations-automation-validation` agent (`./agents/operations-automation-validation.md`), passing `SIPOC_TABLE`.
The agent will produce:
- **Diagnostic table** per step — Classification (four quadrants), Tech suggestion (LLM / State Machine / Rule-based / Human), ROI, Rationale
- **Recommendation summary** — which steps to transform now, which to defer
- A hand-off prompt to Stage 3
Store as `DIAGNOSTIC_RESULT`.
Ask the user which steps to redesign. Default: all steps marked ROI=High or ROI=Medium.
---
## Step 4 — Stage 3: Process Redesign (subagent)
Display:
```
---------------------------------------------
Stage 3: Redesign — sub-tasks, layers, MVP stack
---------------------------------------------
```
For each selected step from `DIAGNOSTIC_RESULT`, launch the `operations-process-redesign` agent (`./agents/operations-process-redesign.md`) one step at a time.
Per step, the agent produces:
- Step title
- Redesign table (Sub-tasks × FE/BE/DB × Suggested tool)
- Flow type (Sequential / Decision Tree / Loop / Human-in-the-loop)
- MVP stack recommendation
- 1–3 sentence summary
After each step, ask:
```
Would you like to redesign the next diagnosed step? (Yes / Skip / Stop)
```
> **Optional Stage 3.5 — streamline the redesigned flow (course Ch5 §5.5.2).** Once Stage 3 has re-chained the steps, run the lean ordering pass on the redesigned flow before building anything: validate I→P→O on every step, map dependencies, eliminate friction (duplicative / looping / missing steps), and re-sequence only where it buys less rework, lower risk, or higher throughput. Invoke `operations-flow-optimization` on the Stage 3 blueprint to produce the final "ideal flow" spine for the MVP build. The principle: **eliminate before you automate** — don't build steps a lean pass would have deleted.
---
## Step 5 — Final blueprint
Compile all step redesigns into a single deliverable:
1. SIPOC map (Stage 1)
2. Diagnostic table (Stage 2)
3. Per-step redesign blueprints (Stage 3)
4. Consolidated MVP stack (deduped across steps)
Ask:
```
Next steps:
1. Hand off blueprint to engineering team
2. Iterate on a specific step
3. Schedule a build session with peter_tu@zynkr.ai
```
---
## Rules
- Stage 1 may ask discovery questions, but Stage 2 and Stage 3 must trust prior agent output — no re-diagnosing
- Always one question at a time during Stage 1
- Diagnostic table classifications are advisory; flag low-ROI steps but do not auto-skip them
- Never recommend LLM-only solutions for rule-based, low-frequency steps (cost mismatch)
## House style
Writing style is **not owned by this file**. The house voice lives in two Google Docs under
`[@] 寫作指南` (`12DBdFz3SK22ie9im_ThFMI7IBRXsTZsV`), read at runtime:
- 《[2.0] Zynkr 通用風格指南 House Voice》 `10bOIQwRm9Pxwgct4hlwCwK_B4Pipai1HqBPZKzyRHSE` —
the universal core, plus the addendum for this surface
- 《[3.2] 禁用詞清單 Forbidden Words》 `1N5sHLP4qzmmhpCGsi6KElxi1z0MFe4QZ0Q_35T10Uyg`
Read both before producing client- or reader-facing text, and scan the draft against 《[3.2]》
before handing it over. If Drive is unreachable, say so in the output rather than proceeding
unchecked. Never re-implement either list inside this file.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!