Use when dogfooding a developer-facing product or workflow to produce an evidence-backed eight-dimension DX scorecard with measured time to hello world and prioritized fixes. Not for visual UI audit — use web-design-review.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add OutlineDriven/odin-claude-plugin --skill developer-experience-review --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Developer Experience Review?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/outlinedriven-developer-experience-review)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: developer-experience-review
description: 'Use when dogfooding a developer-facing product or workflow to produce an evidence-backed eight-dimension DX scorecard with measured time to hello world and prioritized fixes. Not for visual UI audit — use web-design-review.'
---
# Developer experience review
## Contract
| Field | Bound contract |
|---|---|
| Trigger | The user runs /developer-experience-review to dogfood a developer-facing product or workflow |
| Authority | Reversible local: write a review log and an optional plan-review section; browser and CLI interactions are reads that change no remote, credential, paid, published, or deployed state |
| Side effect | A review log and an optional plan-review section under the working directory |
| Done | An evidence-backed eight-dimension scorecard reports measured time to hello world and prioritized DX fixes |
## Inputs
- The product or workflow to dogfood, named by the user (URL, repo path, CLI command, or workflow description). Required.
- One or more benchmark products to score against, named by the user. Optional; when omitted, score the product alone and mark each dimension as absolute rather than comparative.
- A working directory writable for the review log. Defaults to the current directory.
## Procedure
1. Record the target product, any benchmark products, and the current wall-clock start time in the review log. **Done when:** the review log holds the target, benchmarks, and start time.
2. Dogfood the target end to end through the live browser and CLI exactly as a new developer would: install or open it, follow the documented first path, and reach the first meaningful output ("hello world"). Do not skip steps the documentation does not name; do not use private knowledge to bypass friction. **Done when:** the first meaningful output is reached or the run is blocked at a named step.
3. Measure elapsed wall-clock time from the start recorded in step 1 to the first meaningful output. Record the value and every blocking step that extended it. **Done when:** the elapsed time and blocking steps are recorded.
4. Repeat steps 2-3 for each benchmark product, using the same first-meaningful-output definition, and record each measured time. **Done when:** every benchmark is dogfooded with its time recorded, or dropped with a reason.
5. Score the target on eight dimensions, each 1-5, with one sentence of measured evidence per score:
- Time to hello world: the measured value from step 3, ranked against benchmarks when present.
- Documentation clarity: whether the first path was completable from docs alone without guessing.
- Error message quality: whether failures named the cause and the next action.
- Onboarding friction: count of unexplained steps, manual config, or external prerequisites.
- Tooling and CLI ergonomics: command discoverability, output readability, and sensible defaults.
- API or SDK design: whether the first call was obvious from the interface, not from prose.
- Feedback loop speed: time from a change to observing its effect during dogfooding.
- Developer support surface: whether help, examples, and status were reachable without leaving the flow.
**Done when:** all eight dimensions carry a 1-5 score with one measured-evidence sentence.
6. Rank the dimensions by the gap between the target score and the best benchmark score (or, with no benchmarks, by the absolute severity of friction observed). Produce a prioritized list of concrete DX fixes, each tied to the dimension and the measured evidence that motivates it. **Done when:** a prioritized fix list is produced with each fix tied to a dimension and evidence.
7. Write the scorecard, measured times, per-dimension evidence, and prioritized fixes to the review log. If the user supplied a plan or spec to review, append a plan-review section naming where the plan under-invests in the lowest-scored dimensions. **Done when:** the review log is written with the plan-review section appended when a plan was supplied.
8. Return the scorecard and prioritized fixes as the terminal output. **Done when:** the terminal return carries the scorecard and prioritized fixes.
## Failure and recovery
- Cannot reach first meaningful output: stop the clock, record the exact blocking step and the last successful step, score time to hello world as not-achieved, and continue scoring the remaining dimensions from the observed failure. Do not invent a time value.
- Benchmark product unavailable or unreachable: drop it from the comparison, mark the affected dimensions as absolute rather than comparative, and record which benchmark was dropped and why.
- Documentation absent or contradictory: record the contradiction as evidence for the documentation-clarity score; do not guess the intended path.
- Partial result rule: a scorecard missing any dimension is incomplete; keep every dimension present, marking not-achieved or not-observed where evidence is absent, rather than omitting it.
- Rollback: no remote, credential, paid, published, or deployed state is mutated; the only mutation is the local review log, which may be deleted by the user. Never widen scope to fix the product under review.
## Output
A review log with measured time to hello world for the target and each benchmark, an eight-dimension scorecard with one measured-evidence sentence per score, a prioritized list of concrete DX fixes tied to dimensions and evidence, and an appended plan-review section when the user supplied a plan, ordered record-start → dogfood → measure → benchmark → score → prioritize → write → return, with the terminal return being the scorecard and prioritized fixes.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!