Interview the user and create an approved GRACE 4 GraceChangeSpec plus optional design-context.xml inside .grace/changes/active/C-*/.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add osovv/grace-marketplace --skill grace-spec --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Grace Spec?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/osovv-grace-spec-grace-marketplace)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: grace-spec
description: Interview the user and create an approved GRACE 4 GraceChangeSpec plus optional design-context.xml inside .grace/changes/active/C-*/.
---
<skill>
<change_bundle_contract>
`.grace/changes/active/C-CHANGE-ID/`
- `spec.xml` — normative `GraceChangeSpec`
- `design-context.xml` — optional, explanatory only
- `plan.xml` — created later by `grace-plan`
</change_bundle_contract>
<status_rules>
Create `spec.xml` as `status="draft"`. Set `status="approved"` only after explicit user approval. Rejected or cancelled specs move to archive with terminal status. Do not create or edit `plan.xml` in this skill.
</status_rules>
<strict_contract>
The direct `C-*` wrapper must contain exactly one meaningful `Summary`, `Goals`, `Constraints`, `NonGoals`, `AcceptanceCriteria`, `AffectedAreas`, and `VerificationIntent` section. Empty containers are not approval-ready. Semantic anchors are canonical attribute-free XML tags, never attributes or attribute values.
</strict_contract>
<workflow>
1. Ask one focused question at a time until goal, scope, constraints, non-goals, acceptance criteria, affected areas, and verification expectations are clear.
2. Propose a concise design summary and explicit assumptions. Ask for approval before writing an approved spec.
3. Create a deterministic uppercase-kebab `C-*` change id.
4. Write `spec.xml` from `references/change-spec-template.xml` with exactly one direct `C-*` wrapper and no empty required section.
5. If rationale, alternatives, scenarios, or external constraints would otherwise bloat the spec, write non-normative `design-context.xml` from its template.
6. If approval is not explicit, leave `spec.xml` as `status="draft"` and report the approval step needed.
</workflow>
<hard_rules>
- `spec.xml` is the source of truth for `grace-plan`; design context never adds requirements.
- Do not implement code, mutate current graph/verification state, or create retroactive change bundles.
- Recommend `grace lint --path <project-root> --assertions current` as a pre-implementation active-baseline check after writing the bundle; never present it as target or final evidence.
</hard_rules>
</skill>
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!