Detect ZK proof-verifier contract bugs — missing public-input binding (unconstrained input → forgery), proof malleability, BN254 field-element range checks (input >= field modulus), unchecked pairing/ecAdd/ecMul precompile returns, nullifier reuse / double-spend, verification-key upgradeability, and trusted-setup assumptions. Activate whenever a contract verifies a SNARK/STARK proof, calls the bn256/altbn128 precompiles, or consumes nullifiers.
Scanned 9/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add omermaksutii/RugProof --skill zk-verifier-bugs --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Zk Verifier Bugs?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/omermaksutii-zk-verifier-bugs)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: zk-verifier-bugs
description: Detect ZK proof-verifier contract bugs — missing public-input binding (unconstrained input → forgery), proof malleability, BN254 field-element range checks (input >= field modulus), unchecked pairing/ecAdd/ecMul precompile returns, nullifier reuse / double-spend, verification-key upgradeability, and trusted-setup assumptions. Activate whenever a contract verifies a SNARK/STARK proof, calls the bn256/altbn128 precompiles, or consumes nullifiers.
---
# ZK verifier contract bug detection
## When this applies
Trigger on any of:
- On-chain Groth16 / PLONK / Halo2 verifiers (`verifyProof`, `verify`)
- Calls to precompiles `0x06` (ecAdd), `0x07` (ecMul), `0x08` (pairing) over BN254/alt_bn128
- Public-input arrays passed alongside a proof
- Nullifier / commitment sets (mixers, privacy pools, rollup exits)
- Upgradeable verification keys (vk) or governance-set verifiers
- Bridges/rollups that settle based on a validity proof
## Detection patterns
### Unconstrained / unbound public input (CRITICAL)
```solidity
function withdraw(uint256[8] proof, uint256 root, uint256 nullifier, address recipient) external {
require(verifier.verifyProof(proof, [root, nullifier])); // ← recipient NOT in inputs
payable(recipient).transfer(amount);
}
```
**Signal:** a value the contract acts on (`recipient`, `amount`, `chainId`) is not among the proof's public inputs. The proof says nothing about it, so an attacker reuses a valid proof with a different recipient — front-runnable theft. Every value the proof is supposed to authorize must be a bound public input.
### Missing BN254 field-element range check (HIGH)
```solidity
// public input passed straight to the verifier without bounds
require(input < SNARK_SCALAR_FIELD); // ← if MISSING:
```
**Signal:** public inputs (and proof point coordinates) must be `< r` (the BN254 scalar/base field modulus, `21888242871839275222246405745257275088548364400416034343698204186575808495617`). An out-of-range input wraps mod r, letting a different field element pass as a valid input — input forgery. Verifiers must `require(x < FIELD_MODULUS)` for every input.
### Unchecked precompile return value (HIGH)
```solidity
assembly { let ok := staticcall(gas(), 0x08, ...) } // 'ok' / returndata ignored
```
**Signal:** the pairing precompile (`0x08`) returns success flag + a 32-byte result that must equal 1; `ecAdd`/`ecMul` return whether the input points were valid. Ignoring the success bool or the pairing result accepts invalid proofs (precompile reverts on malformed points only sometimes). Always check `success` AND the returned value.
### Nullifier reuse / double-spend (CRITICAL)
```solidity
require(verifier.verifyProof(...));
// ← no check that nullifier was unused; no marking after
payout(recipient);
```
**Signal:** nullifier not checked against `spent[nullifier]` before payout, or not marked spent after (or marked after an external call → reentrant double-spend). Same note must not redeem twice.
### Proof malleability (MEDIUM)
Groth16 proofs are malleable — a valid `(A,B,C)` can be transformed to another valid proof for the same inputs. If proof bytes are used as a dedup/replay key, the twin bypasses it. Dedup on public inputs / nullifiers, never on proof bytes.
### Mutable vk / verifier (HIGH)
An upgradeable or owner-settable verification key lets an admin swap in a vk that validates forged proofs — a centralization backdoor over the entire system's soundness.
## Severity rubric
| Pattern | Severity | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Action value not a bound public input | **Critical** | Proof reuse → theft |
| Nullifier not checked / marked late | **Critical** | Double-spend |
| Missing BN254 field range check | **High** | Input forgery via wraparound |
| Unchecked pairing/ecMul return | **High** | Invalid proofs accepted |
| Mutable vk without timelock/governance | **High** | Soundness backdoor |
| Proof bytes used as replay key (malleable) | **Medium** | Twin-proof bypass |
## Remediation patterns
1. **Bind every authorized value** as a public input committed in-circuit (`recipient`, `amount`, `chainId`, `contractAddress`); verify the input vector matches what the contract acts on.
2. **Range-check all public inputs** `< FIELD_MODULUS` (BN254 `r`) before verification — use the snarkjs/circomlib generated verifier's checks; don't strip them.
3. **Check precompile results** — `require(success)` and `require(out == 1)` for pairing; validate `ecAdd`/`ecMul` success.
4. **Nullifier set:** `require(!spent[n]); spent[n] = true;` *before* any external call (CEI).
5. **Dedup on inputs/nullifiers, not proof bytes**, to neutralize Groth16 malleability.
6. **Govern the vk** behind a timelock/multisig; document the trusted-setup ceremony and its toxic-waste assumptions.
## False-positive notes
- A verifier generated by snarkjs/Circom that already includes the `< r` range checks and full pairing-result check is sound for those concerns — don't re-flag the precompile calls.
- STARK/transparent systems have no trusted-setup assumption — don't flag ceremony concerns there.
- An immutable, audited vk constant is fine — flag only mutable/owner-settable vks.
## Related
- [[signature-malleability]] — proof malleability mirrors ECDSA malleability for replay keys
- [[cross-chain-messaging]] — rollup/bridge settlement consumes these proofs
- [[centralization-risk]] — mutable verification keys are an admin soundness backdoor
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!