Roadmap-specific validation checks for architecture reviews. Load when reviewing roadmaps for implementation readiness.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-roadmap-review-checks --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Nw Roadmap Review Checks?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nwave-ai-nw-roadmap-review-checks-nwave)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: nw-roadmap-review-checks
description: Roadmap-specific validation checks for architecture reviews. Load when reviewing roadmaps for implementation readiness.
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# Roadmap Review Checks
Six mandatory checks for every roadmap review. Each produces a finding block.
## Check 1: External Validity
Verify completing all steps produces an INVOCABLE feature, not just existing code.
Criteria: at least one step targets entry point integration | acceptance tests invoke through driving ports | clear user invocation path after completion
Severity: BLOCKER if no integration step or invocation path. HIGH if tests at wrong boundary.
```
EXTERNAL VALIDITY CHECK: PASSED|FAILED
Issue: {missing wiring}
Consequence: {what happens without fix}
Required Action: {integration step to add}
```
## Check 2: AC Implementation Coupling
Scan AC for implementation details locking crafter into predetermined structure.
Detection: underscore-prefixed identifiers | method signatures with params | internal class references | specific return types
Severity: HIGH. Flag each coupled AC with rewrite.
- Coupled: `_install_des_module() copies src/des/`
- Rewritten: `DES module importable from installation target after install`
Rationale: AC = WHAT (observable behavior), never HOW (internal structure). Crafter decides during GREEN + REFACTOR.
## Check 3: Step Decomposition Ratio
Calculation: implementation steps / unique production files in `files_to_modify`
Thresholds: acceptable <= 2.0 | warning 2.0-2.5 | reject > 2.5
Identical pattern check: 3+ steps with identical AC differing by substitution -> require batching.
## Check 4: Implementation Code in Roadmap
Verify no implementation code. BLOCKER.
Detection: code snippets/algorithms in descriptions | method implementations in AC | pseudocode/logic | variable names, loops, conditionals
Architect defines WHAT; crafter decides HOW. Roadmap code prevents better solutions via TDD.
## Check 5: Roadmap Concision and Precision
Quantitative thresholds: total words 500 (1-3 steps) / 1500 (4-8) / 3000 (9-15) | step description max 50 words | AC max 5 per step, 30 words each | notes max 100 words
Verbosity detection: multi-sentence blocks -> bullets | qualifiers (comprehensive, robust) -> delete | motivational language -> delete | redundancy -> state once | tutorials -> delete, assume expertise
Precision: every AC single interpretation | testable outcome | business over technical jargon
Severity: BLOCKER if word count exceeds threshold.
## Check 6: Unit Test Boundary Validation
Verify unit tests respect hexagonal boundaries.
Rules: invoke through driving ports only | no domain entity unit tests | behavior focus | never import internal/private modules
- Wrong: `Tests verify TemplateValidator._validate_schema() handles edge cases`
- Right: `When invalid template provided to render_prompt(), ValidationError raised with clear message`
Severity: HIGH.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!