Structured persona creation and JTBD analysis methodology - persona templates, ODI job step tables, pain point mapping, success metric quantification, and multi-persona segmentation
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-persona-jtbd-analysis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Nw Persona Jtbd Analysis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nwave-ai-nw-persona-jtbd-analysis-nwave)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: nw-persona-jtbd-analysis
description: Structured persona creation and JTBD analysis methodology - persona templates, ODI job step tables, pain point mapping, success metric quantification, and multi-persona segmentation
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# Persona and JTBD Analysis
Use during Phase 1 (GATHER) when the user lacks clear personas or the "Who" section needs rigorous definition. Provides structured alternative to ad-hoc persona descriptions.
## Persona Template
For each user type, build a complete persona:
```markdown
## Persona: {Name}
**Who**: {Role description -- one sentence capturing relationship to product}
**Demographics**:
- {Characteristic 1: e.g., technical proficiency level}
- {Characteristic 2: e.g., frequency of interaction}
- {Characteristic 3: e.g., environment/context of use}
- {Characteristic 4: e.g., primary motivation}
**Jobs-to-be-Done**: (see Job Step Table below)
**Pain Points**:
- {Pain 1} -- maps to Job Step: {step name}
- {Pain 2} -- maps to Job Step: {step name}
**Success Metrics**:
- {Quantified outcome 1: e.g., "Task completed in < 2 minutes"}
- {Quantified outcome 2: e.g., "Zero manual configuration steps"}
```
## Job Step Table
Each persona has job steps describing what they accomplish. Steps follow ODI format.
| Job Step | Goal | Desired Outcome |
|----------|------|-----------------|
| {Verb} | {What the user wants to achieve} | Minimize {metric} of {undesirable state} |
### Rules for Job Steps
- Job Steps are always **verbs**: Discover, Validate, Install, Configure, Monitor, Recover
- Goals describe what the user **wants**, not what the system does
- Desired Outcomes use ODI format: "Minimize [time/effort/risk/likelihood] of [undesirable state]"
- Each step maps to a workflow point where value is created or destroyed
### Example Job Step Table
| Job Step | Goal | Desired Outcome |
|----------|------|-----------------|
| Discover | Find the right tool for the task | Minimize time to evaluate fit |
| Install | Get the tool running locally | Minimize steps to working state |
| Configure | Adapt to local environment | Minimize likelihood of misconfiguration |
| Verify | Confirm correct installation | Minimize uncertainty about readiness |
| Start | Begin productive work | Minimize time from install to first output |
## Pain Point Mapping
Every pain point maps to a specific job step. Pain points without a corresponding step indicate either a missing step or irrelevant pain point.
```
Pain Point: "I don't know if the tool supports my OS"
-> Job Step: Discover
-> Desired Outcome: Minimize uncertainty about compatibility
Pain Point: "Installation fails silently with no error message"
-> Job Step: Install
-> Desired Outcome: Minimize time to diagnose installation failures
```
Prioritize: pain points on high-frequency job steps deserve attention first.
## Success Metric Quantification
Every success metric needs a number or threshold. Qualitative metrics ("easy to use") are not actionable.
| Qualitative | Quantified |
|-------------|-----------|
| "Easy to install" | "Install completed in < 2 minutes with zero manual steps" |
| "Fast startup" | "First productive output within 30 seconds of launch" |
| "Reliable" | "Zero silent failures; all errors produce actionable messages" |
| "Intuitive" | "New user completes core task without reading documentation" |
## Multi-Persona Segmentation
Different users have fundamentally different jobs even when using the same product. Segment by **relationship** to the product.
Common axes: **Frequency** (first-time vs returning vs power user) | **Role** (end user vs admin vs developer) | **Context** (individual vs team vs CI/CD) | **Motivation** (exploration vs production vs evaluation)
### Example: Same Product, Different Jobs
| Persona | Primary Job | Key Difference |
|---------|-------------|----------------|
| Explorer | Evaluate the tool quickly | Needs fast time-to-value, minimal commitment |
| Returner | Resume work after absence | Needs state preservation, quick re-orientation |
| Deployer | Install for a team | Needs configuration management, multi-user setup |
| Automator | Integrate into CI/CD pipeline | Needs scriptability, headless operation, exit codes |
Each persona gets their own Job Step table because workflows differ. Do not merge personas -- JTBD analysis value comes from surfacing differences.
## Integration with Story Crafting
After completing persona analysis, feed results into LeanUX user story template:
1. Persona **Who** -> populated from persona template
2. Persona **Pain Points** -> inform story Problem section
3. Job Step **Desired Outcomes** -> inform AC (ODI outcomes translate to testable criteria)
4. **Success Metrics** -> inform NFR requirements in handoff package
Cross-reference: use `bdd-requirements` skill for Example Mapping once personas established. Use `jtbd-workflow-selection` skill to determine workflow for resulting stories.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!