Use this skill when the user is building, running, or interpreting the doca/tools/gpunetio_ib_write_bw client+server benchmark — a CUDA kernel on the client posts RDMA WRITE work requests through the doca-gpunetio device-side surface to measure sustained GPU-driven WRITE bandwidth on a GPU+IB-device pair. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "doca-gpunetio-ib-write-bw" or "GPUNetIO" — typical implicit phrasings include "measure WRITE BW when the GPU posts the WRs", "BW swing...
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add NVIDIA/skills --skill doca-gpunetio-ib-write-bw --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Doca Gpunetio Ib Write Bw?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nvidia-doca-gpunetio-ib-write-bw)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
license: Apache-2.0
name: doca-gpunetio-ib-write-bw
description: >
Use this skill when the user is building, running, or interpreting
the doca/tools/gpunetio_ib_write_bw client+server benchmark — a CUDA
kernel on the client posts RDMA WRITE work requests through the
doca-gpunetio device-side surface to measure sustained GPU-driven
WRITE bandwidth on a GPU+IB-device pair. Trigger even when the user
does not explicitly mention "doca-gpunetio-ib-write-bw" or
"GPUNetIO" — typical implicit phrasings include "measure WRITE BW
when the GPU posts the WRs", "BW swings between runs on the same
flags", "is the NIC saturated or am I CPU-bound on the CUDA
kernel", "meson compile fails for the GPUNetIO bw tool",
"nvidia_peermem isn't picking up my GPU buffer", or "GPU-initiated
WRITE throughput vs CPU-initiated perftest". Refuse and route
elsewhere for general doca-gpunetio library work, DOCA install, the
GPU-initiated WRITE latency analog, the CPU-initiated upstream
perftest, or application-level end-to-end throughput — those belong
to other skills.
metadata:
kind: tool
compatibility: >
Requires DOCA SDK on Linux with a BlueField DPU or ConnectX NIC,
NVIDIA GPU, CUDA toolkit and nvcc, loaded `nvidia_peermem`, and an
InfiniBand RNIC paired with the GPU. Uses `pkg-config` for
doca-gpunetio, doca-rdma, and doca-common, plus the installed
gpunetio_ib_write_bw sources. Run only on a trusted, non-shared IB
fabric during the benchmark window.
---
# DOCA GPUNetIO ib_write_bw
**Where to start:** This is a tool skill for the GPUNetIO-
flavored `ib_write_bw` benchmark shipped under
`doca/tools/gpunetio_ib_write_bw/` (a client + server pair,
built from source against the installed DOCA via `meson`).
It measures sustained RDMA WRITE bandwidth when the WRs are
posted **from a CUDA kernel through the doca-gpunetio
device-side surface**, with the GPU on the data path. Open
[`TASKS.md`](TASKS.md) and start at
[`## configure`](TASKS.md#configure) for the GPU-NIC
pairing precondition and the build pattern; jump to
[`## run`](TASKS.md#run) for the smoke-before-bulk flow.
Open [`CAPABILITIES.md`](CAPABILITIES.md) when the question
is *what this tool actually measures*, *how the result
decomposes (GPU occupancy vs NIC issue rate vs link
saturation)*, or *how the result reads against the GPI
sister tool and the upstream CPU-initiated `perftest`
`ib_write_bw`*. If DOCA is not installed yet, route to
[`doca-setup`](../../doca-setup/SKILL.md) first; if the
user is still deciding between the GPI and GPUNetIO
programming surfaces, the picture in
[`../../libs/doca-gpunetio/CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes`](../../libs/doca-gpunetio/CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes)
and
[`../../libs/doca-gpi/CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes`](../../libs/doca-gpi/CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes)
is the first stop.
## Example questions this skill answers well
The CLASSES of `doca-gpunetio-ib-write-bw` questions this
skill is built to answer, each with one worked example. The
class is the load-bearing piece; the worked example is one
instance.
- **"What sustained RDMA-WRITE bandwidth can the GPUNetIO
path deliver on this GPU-NIC pair?"** — worked example:
*"measure sustained WRITE BW between two hosts with an
H100 + ConnectX-7 on each side"*. Answered by the
GPU-NIC pairing precondition in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Capabilities and modes`](CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes)
+ the bring-up flow in
[`TASKS.md ## configure`](TASKS.md#configure) +
[`TASKS.md ## run`](TASKS.md#run). The same shape
answers *"measure GPUNetIO-driven WRITE BW between a
host GPU and a BlueField DPU"*.
- **"Where is the bottleneck — GPU compute occupancy, NIC
issue rate, or link saturation?"** — worked example:
*"I see 120 Gbit/s on a 200 Gbit/s link; is the NIC
saturated, am I CPU-bound on the client, or is the CUDA
kernel not driving enough WRs in flight?"*. Answered by
the throughput-decomposition rules in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Observability`](CAPABILITIES.md#observability)
+ the eval-loop overlay in
[`TASKS.md ## test`](TASKS.md#test).
- **"How does the result differ from the classic CPU-
initiated `perftest` `ib_write_bw`?"** — worked example:
*"my team has a CPU-initiated WRITE BW number on this
same NIC; should I expect the GPUNetIO number to match
or be different?"*. Answered by the *"GPU-initiated
path adds (or removes) overhead vs the CPU-initiated
path"* rule in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Capabilities and modes`](CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes).
- **"Is the doca-gpunetio path the right surface for my
sustained-throughput workload class?"** — worked example:
*"my application streams sensor data from GPU memory at
line rate to a remote consumer"*. Answered by the
*"when GPUNetIO is the right surface vs GPI vs CPU-
initiated"* rule in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Capabilities and modes`](CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes)
+ the use-side decision in [`TASKS.md ## use`](TASKS.md#use).
- **"My BW number swings between runs. What do I check
before quoting it?"** — worked example: *"three runs at
the same flags gave 145, 187, and 160 Gbit/s; is the
benchmark noisy or is my platform inconsistent?"*.
Answered by the measurement-soundness rules in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Error taxonomy`](CAPABILITIES.md#error-taxonomy)
layer 5 + the steady-state guidance in
[`TASKS.md ## test`](TASKS.md#test).
- **"What version of DOCA + CUDA Toolkit do I need for this
binary to build and run?"** — worked example: *"my
install has DOCA at one semver and CUDA at another; will
the ToT-shipped `gpunetio_ib_write_bw` even link?"*.
Answered by the version overlay in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Version compatibility`](CAPABILITIES.md#version-compatibility)
which cross-links the canonical detection chain in
[`doca-version`](../../doca-version/SKILL.md).
## Audience
This skill serves **external developers and performance
engineers who need a reproducible measurement of sustained
RDMA WRITE bandwidth when the WRs are posted from a CUDA
kernel through doca-gpunetio**, on the user's actual install
and GPU-NIC pair. Concretely:
- A developer comparing the GPUNetIO path against the GPI
path or the host-initiated `perftest`-style path before
committing an application design to one of them.
- A platform operator validating a tuning change (NUMA
pinning, GPU PCIe placement, IB device choice, GID
index, NIC firmware burn) by re-running this benchmark
against the new state.
- An SRE / performance engineer producing a *"this is the
GPUNetIO-driven WRITE BW on this GPU-NIC pair today"*
artifact downstream consumers can cite.
- An AI agent answering *"is the doca-gpunetio path a win
for my sustained-throughput workload class"* honestly —
with a measured number, the build + invocation that
produced it, and the GPU + NIC + DOCA version that
scopes it — rather than guessing from datasheet
headlines.
It is **not** for users debugging the `doca-gpunetio`
library itself (route to
[`../../libs/doca-gpunetio/SKILL.md`](../../libs/doca-gpunetio/SKILL.md)),
and **not** a substitute for the `perftest` upstream
`ib_write_bw` (which measures CPU-initiated WRITE BW).
## Language scope
The `doca-gpunetio-ib-write-bw` tool is shipped as **C plus
a CUDA `.cu` translation unit** under
`doca/tools/gpunetio_ib_write_bw/`, split into a `client/`
subtree and a `server/` subtree. The verified surface (per
`client/{main.c,common.h,common.c,kernel.cu,perftest.c}` and
`server/{main.c,common.h,common.c,perftest.c}`): host-side
build via `meson` against the installed DOCA `pkg-config`
modules (`doca-gpunetio`, `doca-rdma`, `doca-common`); the
device-side build via `nvcc` against the DOCA GPU NetIO
device-side header set; the OOB descriptor exchange via a
TCP socket between client and server. There is no Python /
Rust / Go binding — the tool is a pair of CLI binaries.
The skill's job is to keep the operator-side workflow
language-neutral; the device-side CUDA surface is not
wrappable in another language.
## When to load this skill
Load this skill when the user is — or the agent needs to —
build and run the `gpunetio_ib_write_bw` client + server on
real hosts with DOCA installed plus a CUDA Toolkit matched
to the DOCA install, and a GPU + IB device pair on the
host's PCIe topology. Concretely:
- Measuring sustained kernel-initiated RDMA WRITE
bandwidth between two hosts (or a host and a BlueField
DPU) with the GPUNetIO surface.
- Deciding whether the GPUNetIO path is the right runtime
surface for a class of workload vs the GPI programming
surface (the [`doca-gpi`](../../libs/doca-gpi/SKILL.md)
library — `doca/tools/` ships no GPI benchmark binary) or
the classic CPU-initiated `perftest` path.
- Capturing a documented baseline (build + invocation +
DOCA version + GPU + NIC + as-deployed environment +
numbers) for later regression hunts.
- Diagnosing a build / link / run failure that surfaces
the GPUNetIO + RDMA bring-up sequence under this tool's
shipped scaffolding.
Do **not** load this skill for general DOCA orientation,
library API work, or installation. For those, use
[`doca-public-knowledge-map`](../../doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md),
[`../../libs/doca-gpunetio/SKILL.md`](../../libs/doca-gpunetio/SKILL.md),
or [`doca-setup`](../../doca-setup/SKILL.md). Do not load
it for *application-level* end-to-end throughput either —
this benchmark measures the WR-submission path through
GPUNetIO, not the user's full pipeline.
## What this skill provides
This is a **thin loader**. Substantive material lives in
two companion files:
- `CAPABILITIES.md` — what the tool measures (the
sustained-WRITE-BW primitive driven by a client-side
CUDA kernel through doca-gpunetio), the
runtime-surface selection rule (GPUNetIO vs GPI vs
CPU-initiated), the GPU-NIC pairing precondition, the
throughput-decomposition guide (GPU compute occupancy
vs NIC issue rate vs link saturation), the version
overlay (DOCA `.pc` PLUS CUDA Toolkit), the layered
error taxonomy (config-syntax / build-time / GPU-NIC-
pairing / GPUNetIO-lifecycle / RDMA-connection /
measurement-soundness / version / cross-cutting), the
observability surface (stdout report, DOCA log levels,
OOB-socket exchange), and the safety overlay (the
*"GPU-side handle is a credential"* rule from
doca-gpunetio; the cross-cutting hardware-safety
meta-policy).
- `TASKS.md` — step-by-step workflows for the in-scope
task verbs: `install` (preconditions — DOCA install,
CUDA Toolkit, GPU + NIC pair, OOB connectivity),
`configure` (build-tree under
`doca/tools/gpunetio_ib_write_bw/` and the `meson`
build wrapping the shipped DOCA), `build` (the
`meson setup` + `meson compile` pattern from the
public DOCA build documentation), `modify` (do not
patch the shipped tool source; modify the invocation
and the surrounding environment instead), `run` (smoke-
before-bulk; client + server bring-up order; reading
the per-iteration report), `test` (the eval loop —
steady-state, NUMA placement, NIC saturation cross-
check), `debug` (walk the error taxonomy layer by
layer), `use` (how a BW result feeds a class-of-
workload decision), plus a `Deferred task verbs`
block routing out-of-scope questions.
The skill assumes a host where DOCA is already installed,
a CUDA Toolkit matched to the install is present, and the
operator has whatever privileges the public install profile
expects for binding a `doca_dev`, a `doca_gpu`, and an OOB
TCP socket.
## What this skill deliberately does not ship
This skill is **agent guidance**, not a samples or scripts
bundle. To keep the boundary clean, it deliberately does
not contain — and pull requests should not add:
- **Specific flag strings or expected throughput numbers**
beyond what the tool's shipped `--help` and `main.c` ARGP
registration establish. The flag surface is small
(device name, GPU PCIe address, GID index, server IP on
the client side); the agent re-reads the binary's
`--help` on the installed version before quoting flag
strings. Throughput numbers are device-, firmware-,
version-, and topology-specific.
- **Pre-written DOCA GPUNetIO or CUDA kernel source code**
that would compete with the shipped tool tree. The
shipped `client/{main.c,kernel.cu,perftest.c,common.{c,h}}`
and `server/{main.c,perftest.c,common.{c,h}}` files are
the verified worked example; the agent's job is to
route the user there and prescribe minimum-diff
modification per the universal modify-a-sample workflow
in
[`doca-programming-guide`](../../doca-programming-guide/SKILL.md).
- **Wrappers, parsers, or scripts** in any language that
consume the tool's stdout. The output format is small
and documented in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Observability`](CAPABILITIES.md#observability);
if the user wants to script against it, the right
answer is *"read the live source, write the parser
against your installed binary"*.
- **A `samples/`, `bindings/`, or `reference/` subtree.**
This is a thin loader for a shipped tool tree;
substantive material lives in the source tree and in
the GPUNetIO library docs.
## Loading order
1. Read this `SKILL.md` first to confirm the user's
question is in scope (the user actually wants to
measure sustained kernel-initiated WRITE BW through
GPUNetIO, not learn GPUNetIO as a library or do a
CPU-initiated measurement).
2. **For what the tool measures, the surface-selection
rule against the GPI sister tool and the CPU-initiated
`perftest`, the throughput-decomposition guide, the
version overlay, the error taxonomy, the observability
surface, and the safety overlay, see
[CAPABILITIES.md](CAPABILITIES.md).**
3. **For step-by-step workflows — `install`, `configure`,
`build`, `modify`, `run`, `test`, `debug`, `use` — see
[TASKS.md](TASKS.md).**
## Related skills
- [`../../libs/doca-gpunetio/SKILL.md`](../../libs/doca-gpunetio/SKILL.md) —
the library this tool wraps. The per-GPU `doca_gpu`
context, the GPU-visible `doca_gpu_eth_*` and RDMA-side
handles, the CUDA-side persistent-kernel pattern, the
dual capability-discovery rule (DOCA cap-query AND
`cudaGetDeviceProperties`), and the env preconditions
(`nvidia_peermem` loaded, CUDA buffers registered with
DOCA) live there.
- [`../../libs/doca-rdma/SKILL.md`](../../libs/doca-rdma/SKILL.md) —
the underlying RDMA library. The RDMA queue this tool
binds is created and connected via `doca-rdma`; the
queue lifecycle, transport type (RC vs UC vs UD),
permission matrix, and connection method are owned
there.
- [`../../libs/doca-verbs/SKILL.md`](../../libs/doca-verbs/SKILL.md) —
the raw-verbs escape hatch beneath `doca-rdma` /
`doca-gpunetio`. This tool stays on the higher-level
surfaces; `doca-verbs` is the right place only if the
user needs a specific WR flag / QP attribute the
GPUNetIO + RDMA surfaces do not expose.
- [`../doca-gpunetio-ib-write-lat/SKILL.md`](../doca-gpunetio-ib-write-lat/SKILL.md) —
the latency analog of this tool. Same physical
operation; same runtime framework; different metric
class (BW vs latency). The two together carry the
full GPUNetIO-side throughput / latency picture.
- [`doca-gpi`](../../libs/doca-gpi/SKILL.md) — the GPI
programming surface (CUDA-kernel-initiated RDMA), the
alternative runtime framework for the same physical
operation. `doca/tools/` ships no GPI `ib_write_lat` /
`ib_write_bw` benchmark binary, so the GPI comparison is
against the library surface, not a sibling tool. The
selection rule in
[`CAPABILITIES.md ## Capabilities and modes`](CAPABILITIES.md#capabilities-and-modes)
is the decision aid.
- [`doca-version`](../../doca-version/SKILL.md) — the
canonical version-detection chain, four-way match rule,
NGC container semantics, and headers-win-over-docs
rule. The `## Version compatibility` section in this
skill is a thin overlay; the body lives there.
- [`doca-setup`](../../doca-setup/SKILL.md) — env
preparation, install verification, GPU + CUDA Toolkit
pairing, `nvidia_peermem` load, hugepages, NUMA, and
the *I have no install yet* path with the public NGC
DOCA container.
- [`doca-public-knowledge-map`](../../doca-public-knowledge-map/SKILL.md) —
routing to the public DOCA documentation set (DOCA GPU
NetIO, DOCA RDMA pages on `docs.nvidia.com`) and the
`docs.nvidia.com/cuda/` pointer for the CUDA Toolkit.
- [`doca-debug`](../../doca-debug/SKILL.md) — the
cross-cutting debug ladder. The tool surfaces its own
error taxonomy; when the cause is below DOCA, the
taxonomy hands off here.
- [`doca-hardware-safety`](../../doca-hardware-safety/SKILL.md) —
the bundle-wide hardware-safety meta-policy. The
`## Safety policy` overlay cross-links it.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!