Implementing Azure Defender For Cloud

---
name: implementing-azure-defender-for-cloud
description: 'Enable Microsoft Defender for Cloud (CSPM + CWPP) across VMs, containers,
  SQL, storage, and Key Vault, using Azure Policy for evaluation, Log Analytics for
  telemetry, Azure Arc for hybrid coverage, and Logic Apps for automated response.
  Use for Azure security monitoring, adaptive remediation, or regulatory compliance
  assessment; not for non-Azure-only protection or identity defense (Defender for
  Identity).

  '
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: cloud-security
tags:
- cloud-security
- azure
- defender-for-cloud
- cspm
- cwpp
- security-recommendations
version: '1.0'
author: mahipal
license: Apache-2.0
nist_ai_rmf:
- MEASURE-2.7
- MAP-5.1
- MANAGE-2.4
atlas_techniques:
- AML.T0070
- AML.T0066
- AML.T0082
nist_csf:
- PR.IR-01
- ID.AM-08
- GV.SC-06
- DE.CM-01
mitre_attack:
- T1078.004
- T1530
- T1537
- T1580
- T1610
---

# Implementing Azure Defender for Cloud

## When to Use

- When enabling comprehensive security monitoring across Azure subscriptions
- When implementing cloud workload protection for VMs, containers, SQL, storage, and Key Vault
- When compliance requirements demand continuous assessment against regulatory frameworks
- When building adaptive security controls that respond to detected threats
- When centralizing security findings from Azure-native and hybrid workloads

**Do not use** for non-Azure workload protection exclusively (use AWS Security Hub or GCP SCC), for application-level security testing (use Azure DevOps DAST/SAST), or for identity-specific protection (use Microsoft Defender for Identity).

## Prerequisites

- Azure subscription with Contributor or Security Admin role
- Azure Policy enabled for compliance assessment
- Log Analytics workspace for diagnostic data collection
- Azure Arc connected machines for hybrid server protection
- Pricing tier set to Standard for Defender plans (free tier provides CSPM only)

## Workflow

### Step 1: Enable Defender for Cloud Plans

Enable the appropriate Defender plans for each workload type requiring protection.

```bash
# Enable Defender for Cloud CSPM (foundational posture management)
az security pricing create --name CloudPosture --tier standard

# Enable Defender for Servers
az security pricing create --name VirtualMachines --tier standard \
  --subplan P2

# Enable Defender for Containers
az security pricing create --name Containers --tier standard

# Enable Defender for Storage
az security pricing create --name StorageAccounts --tier standard \
  --subplan PerStorageAccount

# Enable Defender for SQL
az security pricing create --name SqlServers --tier standard

# Enable Defender for Key Vault
az security pricing create --name KeyVaults --tier standard

# Enable Defender for App Service
az security pricing create --name AppServices --tier standard

# Verify all enabled plans
az security pricing list \
  --query "[].{Plan:name, Tier:pricingTier, SubPlan:subPlan}" -o table
```

### Step 2: Configure Auto-Provisioning of Security Agents

Enable automatic deployment of monitoring agents to VMs and containers.

```bash
# Enable auto-provisioning of Log Analytics agent
az security auto-provisioning-setting update \
  --name default --auto-provision on

# Configure Log Analytics workspace for data collection
az security workspace-setting create \
  --name default \
  --target-workspace "/subscriptions/SUB_ID/resourceGroups/RG/providers/Microsoft.OperationalInsights/workspaces/SecurityWorkspace"

# Enable Defender for Containers auto-provisioning components
az security setting update \
  --name Sentinel \
  --setting-kind DataExportSettings

# Verify auto-provisioning status
az security auto-provisioning-setting list -o table
```

### Step 3: Review and Prioritize Security Recommendations

Retrieve security recommendations and prioritize remediation based on secure score impact.

```bash
# Get the current secure score
az security secure-score list \
  --query "[].{Name:displayName, Current:current, Max:max, Percentage:percentage}" -o table

# List all active security recommendations
az security assessment list \
  --query "[?status.code=='Unhealthy'].{Name:displayName, Severity:metadata.severity, Category:metadata.category, ResourceCount:status.cause}" \
  -o table

# Get recommendations sorted by severity
az security assessment list \
  --query "[?status.code=='Unhealthy'] | sort_by(@, &metadata.severity)" \
  -o table

# Get detailed recommendation with remediation steps
az security assessment show \
  --name ASSESSMENT_ID \
  --query "{Name:displayName, Description:metadata.description, Severity:metadata.severity, Remediation:metadata.remediationDescription}"

# List recommendations by control
az security secure-score-controls list \
  --query "[].{Control:displayName, CurrentScore:current, MaxScore:max, NotHealthy:notHealthyResourceCount}" \
  -o table
```

### Step 4: Configure Regulatory Compliance Dashboard

Enable compliance standards and monitor adherence across subscriptions.

```bash
# List available regulatory compliance standards
az security regulatory-compliance-standards list \
  --query "[].{Standard:name, State:state}" -o table

# Enable specific compliance standards
az security regulatory-compliance-standards update \
  --name "CIS-Azure-2.0" --state "Enabled"

az security regulatory-compliance-standards update \
  --name "PCI-DSS-4.0" --state "Enabled"

az security regulatory-compliance-standards update \
  --name "NIST-SP-800-53-R5" --state "Enabled"

# Get compliance status for a specific standard
az security regulatory-compliance-controls list \
  --standard-name "CIS-Azure-2.0" \
  --query "[].{Control:id, Description:displayName, State:state, PassedResources:passedResources, FailedResources:failedResources}" \
  -o table

# Get failing assessments for a control
az security regulatory-compliance-assessments list \
  --standard-name "CIS-Azure-2.0" \
  --control-name "2.1" \
  --query "[?state=='Failed'].{Assessment:id, State:state}" -o table
```

### Step 5: Set Up Security Alerts and Automation

Configure alert notifications and automated response workflows.

```bash
# Create security contact for alert notifications
az security contact create \
  --name "SecurityTeam" \
  --email "security-ops@company.com" \
  --phone "+1-555-0199" \
  --alert-notifications on \
  --alerts-to-admins on

# List active security alerts
az security alert list \
  --query "[?status=='Active'].{Name:alertDisplayName, Severity:severity, Time:timeGeneratedUtc, Status:status}" \
  -o table

# Create workflow automation for high-severity alerts (Logic App trigger)
az security automation create \
  --name "high-severity-alert-response" \
  --resource-group "security-rg" \
  --scopes "[{\"description\":\"Full subscription\",\"scopePath\":\"/subscriptions/SUB_ID\"}]" \
  --sources "[{
    \"eventSource\":\"Alerts\",
    \"ruleSets\":[{
      \"rules\":[{
        \"propertyJPath\":\"Severity\",
        \"propertyType\":\"String\",
        \"expectedValue\":\"High\",
        \"operator\":\"Equals\"
      }]
    }]
  }]" \
  --actions "[{
    \"logicAppResourceId\":\"/subscriptions/SUB_ID/resourceGroups/security-rg/providers/Microsoft.Logic/workflows/alert-response\",
    \"actionType\":\"LogicApp\"
  }]"
```

### Step 6: Implement Adaptive Application Controls and JIT VM Access

Configure advanced workload protection features for runtime security.

```bash
# Enable Just-In-Time VM access
az security jit-policy create \
  --resource-group "production-rg" \
  --name "jit-policy" \
  --virtual-machines "[{
    \"id\":\"/subscriptions/SUB_ID/resourceGroups/production-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/web-server-01\",
    \"ports\":[
      {\"number\":22,\"protocol\":\"TCP\",\"allowedSourceAddressPrefix\":\"*\",\"maxRequestAccessDuration\":\"PT3H\"},
      {\"number\":3389,\"protocol\":\"TCP\",\"allowedSourceAddressPrefix\":\"*\",\"maxRequestAccessDuration\":\"PT3H\"}
    ]
  }]"

# Request JIT access when needed
az security jit-policy initiate \
  --resource-group "production-rg" \
  --name "jit-policy" \
  --virtual-machines "[{
    \"id\":\"VM_ID\",
    \"ports\":[{\"number\":22,\"endTimeUtc\":\"2026-02-23T15:00:00Z\",\"allowedSourceAddressPrefix\":\"10.0.1.50\"}]
  }]"

# Review adaptive application control recommendations
az security adaptive-application-controls list \
  --query "[].{Group:displayName, Recommendation:recommendationAction, VMCount:vmRecommendations|length(@)}" \
  -o table
```

## Key Concepts

| Term | Definition |
|------|------------|
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud | Azure-native security platform providing CSPM and cloud workload protection (CWP) across Azure, hybrid, and multi-cloud environments |
| Secure Score | Numerical measure of an organization's security posture based on the percentage of security recommendations that have been implemented |
| Security Recommendation | Actionable guidance from Defender for Cloud to improve security posture, prioritized by severity and secure score impact |
| Defender Plan | Workload-specific protection tier (Servers, Containers, SQL, Storage, etc.) that enables advanced threat detection for specific resource types |
| Just-In-Time VM Access | Feature that reduces attack surface by blocking management ports (SSH/RDP) by default and granting time-limited access on request |
| Adaptive Application Controls | Machine-learning-based allowlisting that recommends which applications should be allowed to run on VMs |

## Tools & Systems

- **Microsoft Defender for Cloud**: Central security platform with CSPM, CWP, and regulatory compliance capabilities
- **Azure Policy**: Governance service used by Defender for Cloud to evaluate and enforce security configurations
- **Log Analytics Workspace**: Backend data store for security telemetry collected by Defender agents
- **Azure Logic Apps**: Workflow automation for incident response triggered by Defender alerts
- **Azure Arc**: Extends Defender for Cloud protection to hybrid and multi-cloud servers and Kubernetes clusters

## Common Scenarios

### Scenario: Rolling Out Defender for Cloud Across a Multi-Subscription Enterprise

**Context**: An enterprise with 20 Azure subscriptions needs to enable Defender for Cloud with server, container, and SQL protection while establishing a compliance baseline against CIS Azure 2.0.

**Approach**:
1. Enable the CSPM plan (CloudPosture) across all subscriptions using Azure Policy initiative
2. Enable Defender for Servers P2, Containers, and SQL on production subscriptions
3. Configure auto-provisioning to deploy Log Analytics agents to all VMs
4. Enable CIS Azure 2.0 and PCI DSS 4.0 compliance standards
5. Create security contacts and configure alert notifications to the SOC team
6. Set up workflow automation for High severity alerts via Logic Apps
7. Enable JIT VM access for all production servers to eliminate persistent SSH/RDP exposure
8. Create a weekly Secure Score report for executive stakeholders

**Pitfalls**: Defender for Servers P2 costs per server per hour. For environments with many VMs, costs can escalate quickly. Use Defender for Servers P1 for development subscriptions and P2 only for production. Auto-provisioning of agents may conflict with existing agent deployments managed by SCCM or other tools.

## Output Format

```
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Deployment Report
=================================================
Organization: Acme Corp
Subscriptions: 20 (12 production, 8 non-production)
Deployment Date: 2026-02-23

DEFENDER PLANS ENABLED:
  CloudPosture (CSPM):     20 / 20 subscriptions
  Servers P2:              12 / 20 (production only)
  Containers:              12 / 20 (production only)
  SQL:                     12 / 20 (production only)
  Storage:                 20 / 20 all subscriptions
  Key Vault:               20 / 20 all subscriptions

SECURE SCORE:
  Current: 62% (baseline)
  Target: 80% within 90 days

COMPLIANCE STATUS (CIS Azure 2.0):
  Compliant controls:        78 / 142 (55%)
  Non-compliant controls:    52 / 142
  Not applicable:            12 / 142

RECOMMENDATIONS:
  Critical:    8 recommendations affecting 34 resources
  High:       24 recommendations affecting 89 resources
  Medium:     56 recommendations affecting 234 resources
  Low:        34 recommendations affecting 112 resources

SECURITY ALERTS (Last 7 Days):
  High severity:    3
  Medium severity:  12
  Low severity:     28
```