Synthesize user research into themes, insights, and
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles --skill research-synthesis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Research Synthesis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nota-america-research-synthesis-forgecat-agent-profiles)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: research-synthesis
description: Synthesize user research into themes, insights, and
recommendations. Use when you have interview transcripts, survey results,
usability test notes, support tickets, or NPS responses that need to be
distilled into patterns, user segments, and prioritized next steps.
argument-hint: <research data, transcripts, or survey results>
---
# /research-synthesis
> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md (`.forgecat/profiles/@forgecat/anthropics_knowledge-work-plugins_design/CONNECTORS.md`).
Synthesize user research data into actionable insights. See the **user-research** skill for research methods, interview guides, and analysis frameworks.
## Usage
```
/research-synthesis $ARGUMENTS
```
## What I Accept
- Interview transcripts or notes
- Survey results (CSV, pasted data)
- Usability test recordings or notes
- Support tickets or feedback
- NPS/CSAT responses
- App store reviews
## Output
```markdown
## Research Synthesis: [Study Name]
**Method:** [Interviews / Survey / Usability Test] | **Participants:** [X]
**Date:** [Date range] | **Researcher:** [Name]
### Executive Summary
[3-4 sentence overview of key findings]
### Key Themes
#### Theme 1: [Name]
**Prevalence:** [X of Y participants]
**Summary:** [What this theme is about]
**Supporting Evidence:**
- "[Quote]" — P[X]
- "[Quote]" — P[X]
**Implication:** [What this means for the product]
#### Theme 2: [Name]
[Same format]
### Insights → Opportunities
| Insight | Opportunity | Impact | Effort |
|---------|-------------|--------|--------|
| [What we learned] | [What we could do] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low |
### User Segments Identified
| Segment | Characteristics | Needs | Size |
|---------|----------------|-------|------|
| [Name] | [Description] | [Key needs] | [Rough %] |
### Recommendations
1. **[High priority]** — [Why, based on which findings]
2. **[Medium priority]** — [Why]
3. **[Lower priority]** — [Why]
### Questions for Further Research
- [What we still don't know]
### Methodology Notes
[How the research was conducted, any limitations or biases to note]
```
## If Connectors Available
If **~~user feedback** is connected:
- Pull support tickets, feature requests, and NPS responses to supplement research data
- Cross-reference themes with real user complaints and requests
If **~~product analytics** is connected:
- Validate qualitative findings with usage data and behavioral metrics
- Quantify the impact of identified pain points
If **~~knowledge base** is connected:
- Search for prior research studies and findings to compare against
- Publish the synthesis to your research repository
## Tips
1. **Include raw quotes** — Direct participant quotes make insights credible and memorable.
2. **Separate observations from interpretations** — "5 of 8 users clicked the wrong button" is an observation. "The button placement is confusing" is an interpretation.
3. **Quantify where possible** — "Most users" is vague. "7 of 10 users" is specific.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!