Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles --skill architecture --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Architecture?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nota-america-architecture-7cdeab83)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: architecture
description: Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when
choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design
decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal,
or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.
argument-hint: <decision or system to design>
---
# /architecture
> If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md (`.forgecat/profiles/@forgecat/anthropics_knowledge-work-plugins_engineering/CONNECTORS.md`).
Create an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) or evaluate a system design.
## Usage
```
/architecture $ARGUMENTS
```
## Modes
**Create an ADR**: "Should we use Kafka or SQS for our event bus?"
**Evaluate a design**: "Review this microservices proposal"
**System design**: "Design the notification system for our app"
See the **system-design** skill for detailed frameworks on requirements gathering, scalability analysis, and trade-off evaluation.
## Output — ADR Format
```markdown
# ADR-[number]: [Title]
**Status:** Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded
**Date:** [Date]
**Deciders:** [Who needs to sign off]
## Context
[What is the situation? What forces are at play?]
## Decision
[What is the change we're proposing?]
## Options Considered
### Option A: [Name]
| Dimension | Assessment |
|-----------|------------|
| Complexity | [Low/Med/High] |
| Cost | [Assessment] |
| Scalability | [Assessment] |
| Team familiarity | [Assessment] |
**Pros:** [List]
**Cons:** [List]
### Option B: [Name]
[Same format]
## Trade-off Analysis
[Key trade-offs between options with clear reasoning]
## Consequences
- [What becomes easier]
- [What becomes harder]
- [What we'll need to revisit]
## Action Items
1. [ ] [Implementation step]
2. [ ] [Follow-up]
```
## If Connectors Available
If **~~knowledge base** is connected:
- Search for prior ADRs and design docs
- Find relevant technical context
If **~~project tracker** is connected:
- Link to related epics and tickets
- Create implementation tasks
## Tips
1. **State constraints upfront** — "We need to ship in 2 weeks" or "Must handle 10K rps" shapes the answer.
2. **Name your options** — Even if you're leaning one way, I'll give a more balanced analysis with explicit alternatives.
3. **Include non-functional requirements** — Latency, cost, team expertise, and maintenance burden matter as much as features.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!