Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Ito Training

ASecurity

Inspect the availability of ML training on a completed Itô compute booking and, when the canonical backend becomes available, hand off an explicitly confirmed training manifest. Use after ito-compute has booked GPU nodes and the user wants pre-training, fine-tuning, or RL on that metal. ECC implements no training stack of its own.

18 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/20/2026
ai-agentsgonodeapibackenddocumentation

Works with

cliapimcp

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/20/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add nguyentrunghieutcu/ctxora-engine --skill ito-training --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Ito Training?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Ito Training
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/nguyentrunghieutcu-ito-training/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/nguyentrunghieutcu-ito-training)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: ito-training
description: Inspect the availability of ML training on a completed Itô compute booking and, when the canonical backend becomes available, hand off an explicitly confirmed training manifest. Use after ito-compute has booked GPU nodes and the user wants pre-training, fine-tuning, or RL on that metal. ECC implements no training stack of its own.
metadata:
  origin: ECC
  status: scaffold
---

# Itô Training

`ito-training` is the canonical ECC skill for training on Itô compute. ECC
never runs a trainer, scheduler, or data pipeline of its own; it never books,
reserves, or spends. This skill chains off a **completed booking** from
`ito-compute`.

## Current production boundary

Managed training is unavailable today. The ECC bridge exposes only `login`,
`logout`, `auth`, `find`, `status`, and explicitly gated `evals`. It has no
`train` verb, and the canonical CLI's `run` verb and desk `training-run`
backend remain scaffolds. The locally enforceable guarantee is that ECC rejects
`train` before resolving or spawning the credential-bearing canonical client.

Therefore stop before authentication or any command invocation. Report the
missing capability and return to the originating agent. Never substitute a
local trainer, SSH helper, browser workflow, or purchase endpoint.

## Required entitlement

When training is implemented, its first gate is a server-verified completed
booking. Harness memory, an RFQ, a quote, node IPs, or SSH access are not proof
of entitlement. The backend must return fresh training eligibility bound to the
authenticated account, booking, GPU topology, region, fabric, and term.
Expired, revoked, mismatched, incomplete, or already-released bookings fail
closed before confirmation.

## Future CLI and API contract

The intended command name is `train`. The future handoff must be equivalent to:

```sh
ecc ito train \
  --booking <server-verified-booking-id> \
  --manifest <absolute-reviewed-json-file> \
  --confirmation-ref <opaque-non-authorizing-reference> \
  --idempotency-key <stable-retry-key> \
  --json
```

The reviewed manifest must identify the model size and revision, data
references with decontamination provenance, training target, post-training
recipe, budget ceiling in USD, checkpoint policy, and maximum incremental
cost. No raw API key, SSH key, node password, bearer token, or dataset
credential belongs in arguments, manifests, logs, MCP results, or chat.

The client must canonicalize the manifest path, reject symlinks, open a regular
file without following links, require appropriate ownership and restrictive
permissions, enforce a bounded size, and hash bytes from the opened descriptor.
That digest must exactly equal the digest bound into confirmation before any
workload mutation. A path swap, digest mismatch, oversized file, or mutable
unsafe file fails closed.

The canonical API—not ECC—must own workload creation and return structured JSON
with `ok`, `live_api_contacted`, `notice`, and either `data` or `error`.
Training data must include stable booking, run, manifest, and idempotency IDs
plus a state enum. Errors must include a stable code and safe message without
secrets.

## Confirmation and execution gates

Before workload creation, require all of the following:

1. Fresh entitlement and training eligibility from the canonical backend.
2. A reviewable immutable manifest and deterministic digest.
3. A separate single-use confirmation bound to account, action, manifest, and
   cost, with a short expiry and replay protection. CLI arguments carry only an
   opaque, non-authorizing confirmation reference; the server resolves and
   consumes the bearer capability out of band.
4. A caller-supplied idempotency key reserved atomically with the run.
5. Server-side fabric, capacity, data-policy, checkpoint-storage, and cost
   validation, including the manifest's budget ceiling.

Authentication is identity, not workload authority. A login, API key, quote,
or completed booking never substitutes for the training confirmation.
Inspection and plan generation must not create a workload. Cancel and cleanup
are separate mutations with their own scoped confirmation and idempotency
boundaries.

## Lifecycle and recovery

The production surface is incomplete until the same canonical client exposes
tenant-scoped status, logs, metrics, checkpoint listing, cancel, and cleanup.
Every operation needs bounded connect and overall timeouts, revocation-aware
errors, and structured output. After an ambiguous transport failure, query
status by the idempotency key before retrying; never create a second run merely
because the first response was lost. A revoked credential stops polling and
returns control to the originating agent without starting login automatically.

Report stage gates honestly; never override a failed eval gate. Cleanup must be
observable and must not release or modify the underlying booking unless that
separate economic action was explicitly authorized.

## Proposed backend stages

These stages describe the future backend (Layer 0.3), not code that exists in
ECC:

1. Data prep — manifest, dedup, decontamination against the eval suite;
   150M-ladder decision job as the cheap pre-check for custom data.
2. Parallelism and precision — selected from model size, node count, fabric;
   wasteful combinations refused.
3. Checkpointing and fault tolerance — async DCP, torchft; detect < 10 min,
   resume < 15 min. Loss-spike restart is a proposed, human-gated action.
4. Curriculum and eval gates — staged pretrain / mid-train / long-context /
   post-training, each with a fixed eval battery; a failed gate stops the run.
5. Post-training — SFT → DPO → RLVR (GRPO with DAPO stability fixes),
   trainer/rollout separation with bounded staleness.

The backend emits desk telemetry (goodput, interruption rate, checkpoint
bandwidth) so the desk prices training blocks honestly.

Until every gate and lifecycle operation above exists in the canonical runtime,
this skill remains a fail-closed availability check and documentation handoff.

Attribution

nguyentrunghieutcunguyentrunghieutcu
View sourceMore from nguyentrunghieutcu →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.

1023331 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

686011 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers prior coding-agent session context by running `catchup <agent> --since-compact`, which extracts a clean summary of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, OpenCode, or Pi Agent session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", or asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

611 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →