Write a developer-audience launch post — Show HN, a Product Hunt blurb, a 'we shipped X' dev blog intro, or a launch tweet thread. Use when launching a tool, library, API, or open-source project to a technical audience. Produces a credible, hype-free post that leads with what it does and why it's different, plus title options and a comment-ready first reply.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill launch-post --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Launch Post?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mohitagw15856-launch-post)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: launch-post
description: "Write a developer-audience launch post — Show HN, a Product Hunt blurb, a 'we shipped X' dev blog intro, or a launch tweet thread. Use when launching a tool, library, API, or open-source project to a technical audience. Produces a credible, hype-free post that leads with what it does and why it's different, plus title options and a comment-ready first reply."
homepage: https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/skill/launch-post.html
metadata:
{
"openclaw": { "emoji": "🗣" }
}
---
# Launch Post Skill
Developers smell marketing from a mile away. A launch post that lands with them is concrete, honest about
trade-offs, and leads with *what it does and why you built it* — not adjectives. This skill writes that post
(Show HN, Product Hunt, dev blog, or a tweet thread), tuned to the channel, with title options and a strong
first comment to seed the discussion.
## Required Inputs
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:
- **What you built** — the tool/library/API, in one plain sentence.
- **The problem & why now** — what was painful before; why you made it.
- **What's different** — how it compares to the obvious alternatives (honestly).
- **Proof** — a code snippet, benchmark, demo link, repo, or "how it works" detail.
- **Channel & ask** — Show HN / Product Hunt / blog / X thread, and what you want (feedback, stars, signups).
## Output Format
### [Channel] launch post
**Title options (3)** — concrete and specific; for Show HN follow the `Show HN: [Name] – [what it does]` form. No hype words.
**The post**
- **Opening (1–2 lines):** what it is and the problem it solves — no preamble.
- **Why we built it:** the honest origin / the gap in existing tools.
- **How it works / what's different:** the technical substance — a snippet or concrete detail beats claims.
- **Honest limits:** what it doesn't do yet, known trade-offs. (This *builds* credibility with devs.)
- **The ask:** try it / feedback / repo link — one clear next step.
**First comment (seed)** — a ready-to-post reply adding technical context or answering the obvious first question, to kick off discussion.
**Channel notes** — tweaks for the chosen channel (HN: no marketing tone, be in the thread to reply; PH: tagline + first comment; X: thread hook + cadence).
## Quality Checks
- [ ] Leads with what it does and the problem — not "excited to announce"
- [ ] Includes concrete proof (snippet, benchmark, demo, or how-it-works detail)
- [ ] Honestly states limits/trade-offs — credibility, not spin
- [ ] Title options are specific and channel-appropriate (e.g. correct Show HN format)
- [ ] One clear ask, and a first comment ready to seed the thread
## Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not use marketing hype ("revolutionary", "game-changing") — devs downvote it
- [ ] Do not hide limitations — naming them earns trust and pre-empts the top comment
- [ ] Do not bury the what-it-does under backstory — lead with substance
- [ ] Do not make claims without proof — show the code/benchmark/demo
- [ ] Do not write a generic post — tune tone and format to the actual channel
## Based On
Developer-launch craft (Show HN / Product Hunt norms): substance over hype, honest trade-offs, seed the discussion.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!