Chase unanswered emails without being annoying — the escalating-gently sequence with timing rules, the re-ask that makes replying easy, and the close-the-loop discipline that ends zombie threads. Use when asked they haven't replied what do I send, write a follow-up that isn't pushy, how long do I wait before chasing, or manage my waiting-on list. Produces the follow-up sequence with dates, drafts per rung, and the give-up-gracefully exit.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill follow-up-chaser --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Follow Up Chaser?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mohitagw15856-follow-up-chaser-6766ece4)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: follow-up-chaser
description: "Chase unanswered emails without being annoying — the escalating-gently sequence with timing rules, the re-ask that makes replying easy, and the close-the-loop discipline that ends zombie threads. Use when asked they haven't replied what do I send, write a follow-up that isn't pushy, how long do I wait before chasing, or manage my waiting-on list. Produces the follow-up sequence with dates, drafts per rung, and the give-up-gracefully exit."
---
# Follow-Up Chaser Skill
Unanswered email dies in two ways: never chased (the ask silently expires) or chased badly ("just bumping this!" seven times, each one easier to ignore than the last). Good chasing is engineered: each follow-up *lowers the cost of replying* — restating the ask smaller, offering a default, adding a deadline with a reason — and the sequence escalates channel or stakes, not temperature. Three rungs, then a graceful close that converts silence into an answer.
## What This Skill Produces
- **The sequence** — 2–3 follow-ups with dates, each drafted, each easier to answer than the last
- **The re-ask engineering** — the original request shrunk to its yes/no core with a default attached
- **The channel escalation** — when rung 3 moves from email to chat/call, and how to do it without ambush
- **The graceful close** — the final note that ends the thread with the relationship intact
## Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- **The original ask and its date** — what was requested, how big the ask is (a signature vs. a favor vs. a decision), and any real deadline
- **The relationship and power direction** — chasing a report, a peer, a boss, and a customer are four different cadences
- **The stakes** — blocking your work? Nice-to-have? The sequence's pace and the close's shape follow
## Framework: The Chase Rules
1. **Wait right:** internal asks get 2–3 business days before rung one; external/senior get 4–5; anything with a stated deadline gets chased at deadline-minus-buffer regardless. Chasing at 24 hours reads as pressure; at two weeks the thread is cold and the chase restarts from context.
2. **Rung 1 — reduce the ask:** don't "bump" — *shrink*. Restate in one line, convert to yes/no where possible, attach a default: "If I don't hear by Friday I'll go with option A — flag if that's wrong." Defaults convert silence into a decision, which is the whole trick.
3. **Rung 2 — add legitimate urgency:** the reason the timing matters, stated plainly ("the vendor quote expires Thursday"), plus the smallest possible version of the ask ("even a one-word yes works"). Never manufactured urgency — one fake deadline poisons all future real ones.
4. **Rung 3 — change channel, kindly:** "Sending a quick ping here in case email got buried" — chat or a 2-minute call ask. Channel escalation reads as helpful persistence; a third identical email reads as nagging.
5. **The close:** after rung 3, silence *is* the answer — close explicitly: "Haven't heard back, so I'll [default/drop it]. Reopen anytime." Closing converts a zombie thread into a decision, protects the relationship, and — often — finally triggers the reply.
## Output Format
# Chase Plan: [the ask] — sent [date]
## The Sequence
| Rung | Send date | Channel | The move |
|---|---|---|---|
## The Drafts
[Rung 1: the shrunk ask + default, verbatim · Rung 2: urgency + smallest ask · Rung 3: the channel ping · The close]
## Waiting-On Hygiene
[The @waiting entry: what, who, next rung date — reviewed weekly]
## Quality Checks
- [ ] Rung 1 shrinks the ask rather than bumping it
- [ ] Every deadline cited is real, with its reason
- [ ] The default-on-silence appears wherever a default legitimately exists
- [ ] Channel escalation happens once, framed as buried-email courtesy
- [ ] The close is drafted before the sequence starts — silence has a planned meaning
## Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not send "just bumping this" — a bump adds nothing and costs attention
- [ ] Do not escalate temperature (guilt, passive aggression) — escalate channel and clarity instead
- [ ] Do not chase without a waiting-list entry — untracked chases become the zombie threads
- [ ] Do not fake urgency — the first discovered fake deadline devalues every future real one
- [ ] Do not let threads die unclosed — an explicit close beats an awkward silence in every relationship that matters
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!