Get foreign qualifications, degrees, or professional licenses recognised in a new country — figure out whether recognition is even needed, which body assesses it, what evidence they want, and the bridging route if there's a gap. Use when someone says 'get my degree recognised abroad', 'is my foreign license valid here', 'credential evaluation', or 'can I work as a [nurse/engineer/teacher] in [country] with my qualifications'. Produces a recognition roadmap, the assessing body, an evidence che...
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill credential-recognition --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Credential Recognition?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/mohitagw15856-credential-recognition)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: credential-recognition
description: "Get foreign qualifications, degrees, or professional licenses recognised in a new country — figure out whether recognition is even needed, which body assesses it, what evidence they want, and the bridging route if there's a gap. Use when someone says 'get my degree recognised abroad', 'is my foreign license valid here', 'credential evaluation', or 'can I work as a [nurse/engineer/teacher] in [country] with my qualifications'. Produces a recognition roadmap, the assessing body, an evidence checklist, and the bridging options. Routes to official assessment bodies; requirements are country- and profession-specific."
homepage: https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/skill/credential-recognition.html
metadata:
{
"openclaw": { "emoji": "🧠" }
}
---
# Credential Recognition Skill
Skilled newcomers routinely end up underemployed not because they lack skills but
because their qualifications sit unrecognised — the doctor driving a taxi is a cliché
because the recognition process is opaque, slow, and different for every profession
and country. This skill maps it: whether your field even *requires* formal recognition
(many don't), which body assesses it, exactly what evidence they need, and — when
there's a gap between your training and the local standard — the bridging route to
close it rather than starting over. Requirements are country- and profession-specific,
so everything routes to the official assessing body.
## What This Skill Produces
- A **recognition roadmap**: whether recognition is needed at all (regulated profession
vs not), and if so, the steps from where you are to being able to practise/be credited
- The **assessing body**: which organization actually evaluates your credential (a
regulator, a credential-evaluation service, a professional body) — the source of truth
- An **evidence checklist**: the documents they'll want (transcripts, certified
translations, syllabi, proof of experience, professional references) and how to obtain
and certify them
- A **gap and bridging plan**: if your qualification is partially recognised, the
bridging exams/courses/supervised-practice to close the gap — usually far faster than
requalifying from scratch
## Required Inputs
Ask for (if not already provided):
- The qualification/license, the field, where it's from, and the country where
recognition is wanted
- Whether the target profession is regulated (medicine, law, nursing, engineering,
teaching, accounting usually are; many tech/creative/business roles are not)
- The goal: to practise a regulated profession, to have a degree recognised for a job/
further study, or to be licensed
- What documents are already in hand and their language
## Framework
1. **First: is recognition even required?** Many fields don't need formal recognition —
an employer just wants to see the qualification, and a credential-evaluation report
suffices. Regulated professions (health, law, engineering, teaching, etc.) require
formal recognition/licensing to practise. Establish which world you're in before
spending months on a process you may not need.
2. **Find the right assessing body.** Regulated profession → its regulator/licensing
board. Degree-for-employment/study → a national credential-evaluation service or the
institution. Trade → the relevant trade body. Sending documents to the wrong assessor
is a common wasted step; identify the owner and route there.
3. **Assemble the evidence they specify.** Typically certified copies, official
transcripts, certified translations, sometimes course syllabi and proof of
supervised hours/experience, plus identity and status documents. Getting official
documents from the origin country can be slow — start those requests early.
4. **Get the gap assessed honestly.** Recognition often comes back as "recognised,"
"partially recognised — bridge X," or "not equivalent." A partial result is normal
and usually good news: bridging (an adaptation exam, a top-up course, a period of
supervised practice) is far quicker than requalifying. Plan for the likely partial
outcome rather than assuming full or none.
5. **Sequence with work and status.** Recognition can take months; plan interim work
where allowed, and check how recognition interacts with visa/status (some visas
require it, some jobs allow supervised practice while it's pending). Route the
specifics to the assessing body and immigration source.
## Output Format
```
## Is recognition even required?
[Regulated profession (need formal recognition/licensing) vs not (evaluation report may
suffice) — establish this first]
## Your assessing body
[Who evaluates this credential for this country/profession — the source of truth]
## Evidence checklist
[Certified copies, transcripts, translations, syllabi, experience proof — and how/where
to get each · start origin-country requests early]
## Likely outcome & bridging
[Recognised / partial (bridge X) / not equivalent · the bridging route for a partial —
faster than requalifying]
## Sequencing with work & status
[Interim options while pending · how it interacts with visa/status — verify]
⚠ Requirements are country- and profession-specific and change — confirm everything with
the official assessing body and immigration authority.
```
## Quality Checks
- [ ] The "is recognition even needed?" question is answered first (regulated vs not)
- [ ] The correct assessing body is identified and routed to
- [ ] The evidence checklist includes translations/certification and flags slow
origin-country requests to start early
- [ ] The likely-partial outcome and bridging routes are planned for
- [ ] Interaction with visa/status and interim work is addressed
## Anti-Patterns
- [ ] Do not assert a country/profession's exact requirements as fact — they vary
enormously; route to the official assessing body
- [ ] Do not assume recognition is needed — send people down that road only if their
field requires it
- [ ] Do not frame a partial recognition as failure — bridging is the normal, faster path
- [ ] Do not forget the slow documents — origin-country transcripts and certifications
are the usual bottleneck
- [ ] Do not give immigration advice — flag where recognition and status interact and
route to the authority
## Related
[[arrival-setup]] for the first-weeks logistics; [[the-visa-interview]] and
[[immigration-document-checklist]] for status; [[resume]] and [[linkedin-profile]] to
present recognised credentials; [[two-worlds-translator]] for the cultural transition.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!