State-of-the-art API design and audit guidance (2026) covering REST/HTTP, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSockets/SSE/realtime, webhooks, versioning/evolution, and API security/operations. Use when designing or building any API surface (endpoints, schemas, protos, realtime channels, webhook senders/receivers) AND when auditing/reviewing existing APIs for correctness, evolvability, security, and operational robustness. Not for browser UI, rendering, or client-framework concerns — use sota-web-frameworks or ...
Scanned 8/31/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add martinholovsky/SOTA-skills --skill sota-api-design --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of sota-api-design?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/martinholovsky-sota-api-design)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: sota-api-design
description: >-
State-of-the-art API design and audit guidance (2026) covering REST/HTTP,
GraphQL, gRPC, WebSockets/SSE/realtime, webhooks, versioning/evolution, and
API security/operations. Use when designing or building any API surface
(endpoints, schemas, protos, realtime channels, webhook senders/receivers)
AND when auditing/reviewing existing APIs for correctness, evolvability,
security, and operational robustness. Not for browser UI, rendering, or
client-framework concerns — use sota-web-frameworks or sota-frontend-design.
Trigger keywords: API, REST, GraphQL,
gRPC, endpoint, websocket, SSE, realtime, WebRTC, webhook, versioning, OpenAPI,
pagination, idempotency, rate limit, problem+json, protobuf, deprecation.
---
# SOTA API Design & Audit
## Purpose
Expert-level rules for building and auditing API surfaces: HTTP/REST semantics,
GraphQL, gRPC/protobuf, realtime (WebSocket/SSE/WebTransport), webhooks, contract
evolution, and the security/operational envelope around all of them. Rules are
imperative with rationale and good/bad examples; every rules file ends with an
audit checklist. Use the index table below to load only the files relevant to the
task — do not read all files for a narrow question.
## BUILD mode
When designing or implementing an API:
1. **Pick the protocol deliberately.** Read `rules/04` §1 first if the choice
(REST vs GraphQL vs gRPC vs realtime transport) is open. Default: gRPC
service-to-service, REST at the edge, GraphQL only for multi-client shape
diversity, SSE for server-push, WS only for true bidirectional.
2. **Contract first.** Write the OpenAPI/SDL/proto before handlers. Get the
resource model, error shape (RFC 9457), pagination, and naming right in the
spec — they are nearly impossible to fix later (`rules/01`, `rules/02`).
3. **Design for a decade of additive change.** String enums not booleans, RFC
3339 timestamps, opaque IDs, open enums, tolerant-reader contract, CI
breaking-change diff from day one (`rules/02`).
4. **Build the unhappy paths with the happy path**: idempotency keys, 429 +
Retry-After, timeout budgets, problem+json errors, size limits — these are
features, not hardening passes (`rules/01` §6, `rules/07`).
5. **Realtime and webhooks are protocols, not endpoints.** Specify auth,
heartbeat, resume, ordering, backpressure, and close semantics (`rules/05`);
signing, retries, SSRF egress controls (`rules/06`) before writing code.
6. **Security envelope is part of the design**: authn scheme per consumer type,
per-principal rate limits, tenant isolation derived from credentials, audit
logging (`rules/07`).
7. Before declaring done, run the relevant files' **Audit checklists** against
your own design as a self-review.
## AUDIT mode
When reviewing an existing API:
1. Identify the surfaces in scope (REST endpoints, GraphQL schema, protos, WS/SSE
handlers, webhook senders/receivers, gateway config) and load the matching
rules files.
2. Work through each file's **Audit checklist** against the actual code/spec —
verify in code, don't trust docs or comments. Prefer reading: route
definitions, middleware chains, error handlers, pagination queries, proto
history, WS connection handlers, webhook dispatch code, gateway/limiter
config.
3. Actively probe the classic gaps: missing object-level authz (BOLA), offset
pagination on big tables, `200 {"error":…}`, missing deadlines, unbounded WS
send buffers, unsigned webhooks, SSRF in webhook egress, origin-reflection
CORS, tenant ID taken from the request body.
### Severity conventions
- **Critical** — exploitable security flaw or guaranteed data corruption/loss:
missing object-level/tenant authz, unsigned or non-constant-time-verified
webhooks, SSRF-able webhook egress, credential leakage (query strings/logs),
origin-reflection CORS with credentials, reused proto field numbers,
double-execution of payments (no idempotency on money writes).
- **High** — breaks clients or production under normal conditions: breaking
change shipped without versioning/deprecation, no rate limiting on authed
surface, missing deadlines/timeout hierarchy, unbounded pagination or
request sizes, no WS backpressure/resume (silent data gaps), non-idempotent
webhook consumers.
- **Medium** — erodes the contract or operability: wrong status codes, non-RFC
9457 error sprawl, offset pagination at scale, spec/implementation drift, no
Sunset/Deprecation signaling, missing rate-limit headers, N+1 resolvers,
closed response enums.
- **Low** — polish and convention: naming inconsistency, missing `operationId`s,
missing preflight cache, suboptimal cache headers, missing pagination link
hints.
### Finding format
```
[SEVERITY] <one-line title>
Where: <file:line | endpoint | schema element>
Rule: <rules-file §section>
Issue: <what is wrong, with the observed evidence (code/HTTP exchange)>
Impact: <concrete consequence — who breaks, what leaks, what corrupts>
Fix: <specific change; example snippet/header/schema where load-bearing>
```
Order findings by severity; one finding per root cause; no speculative findings
without evidence in code or spec.
## Rules index
| File | Read this when... |
|---|---|
| `rules/01-rest-http-design.md` | Designing/auditing REST endpoints: resource modeling, methods/status codes, cursor pagination, filtering, partial responses, idempotency keys, ETags/conditional requests, HATEOAS pragmatism, RFC 9457 errors, OpenAPI-first, contract testing. |
| `rules/02-versioning-evolution.md` | Changing an existing API, adding/removing fields, choosing URL vs header versioning, planning deprecation (Sunset/Deprecation headers), enum/schema evolution, tolerant readers, CI breaking-change gates. |
| `rules/03-graphql.md` | Any GraphQL work: schema/nullability/connections design, N+1 and dataloaders, depth/cost/alias limits, persisted-query allowlists, error channels (userErrors vs errors), resolver authz, when GraphQL is the wrong choice. |
| `rules/04-grpc-protocols.md` | gRPC/protobuf work or protocol selection: field-number/reserved evolution rules, deadlines and cancellation propagation, streaming patterns, rich error details, gRPC-Web/Connect, L7 load balancing, REST vs GraphQL vs gRPC decision table. |
| `rules/05-realtime-websockets-sse.md` | WebSocket/SSE/realtime features: transport choice (WS vs SSE vs WebTransport), upgrade auth & CSWSH, heartbeats, reconnect backoff + resume tokens, ordering/delivery guarantees, backpressure, close codes, SSE replay, pub/sub fanout scaling, presence; WebRTC server hardening (TURN relay abuse, DTLS-SRTP, signaling) when self-hosted. |
| `rules/06-webhooks.md` | Sending or receiving webhooks: HMAC signing + timestamp + rotation, replay protection, retry/backoff design, ordering caveats, idempotent consumers, outbox dispatch, reconciliation APIs, SSRF defenses for user-supplied URLs. |
| `rules/07-security-operations.md` | Cross-cutting security/ops on any API: authn scheme selection (keys/OAuth2/mTLS), rate limiting + 429/Retry-After, quotas, request size limits, timeout budgets, CORS, audit logging, multi-tenant isolation, cross-tenant testing. |
## Top-10 non-negotiables
1. **Object-level authorization on every handler** — derive tenant/ownership from
the credential, never from the request; cross-tenant access returns a
consistent 404. (rules/07 §1, §7)
2. **Never `200 {"error":…}`** — correct status codes, single RFC 9457
problem+json error shape API-wide, machine-readable codes, trace ID, no
internals leaked. (rules/01 §3, §9)
3. **Cursor pagination with enforced max limit** on every collection that can
grow; stable sort with unique tiebreaker; no unbounded lists in REST or
GraphQL. (rules/01 §4, rules/03 §2)
4. **Idempotency for unsafe operations**: Idempotency-Key with stored-response
replay on anything that moves money or sends things; webhook consumers dedupe
on event ID. (rules/01 §6, rules/06 §4)
5. **Additive-only evolution, enforced by CI** (oasdiff/buf breaking/schema
check); clients ignore unknown fields; breaking changes go through the
announce→Deprecation/Sunset→measure→410 pipeline. (rules/02)
6. **Deadlines/timeouts everywhere, outer > inner**, propagated and cancellable;
long work is async (202 + status resource), never a long-held connection.
(rules/04 §3, rules/07 §4)
7. **Per-principal rate limits + quotas** with 429, Retry-After, and RateLimit
headers, enforced in a shared store; expensive operations cost-weighted.
(rules/07 §2)
8. **Realtime must resume**: heartbeats, jittered reconnect backoff, sequence
IDs + bounded replay buffer, explicit resume-failure → snapshot; bounded send
queues with a defined slow-consumer policy. (rules/05 §2)
9. **Webhooks signed and SSRF-proof**: HMAC(timestamp + raw body) verified in
constant time with replay window; senders block private/metadata IPs with
resolve-pin-connect and follow no redirects. (rules/06 §2, §8)
10. **Proto/GraphQL schema discipline**: never reuse a proto field number
(reserve removed ones), enum zero = UNSPECIFIED, GraphQL non-null only when
guaranteed, every data-touching resolver behind a dataloader. (rules/04 §2,
rules/03 §2–3)
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!