Differential abundance (DA) and differential state (DS) analysis for flow and mass cytometry - tests which cell populations change in frequency or marker expression between conditions using diffcyt (edgeR/voom/GLMM for DA, limma/LMM for DS), with cydar, CITRUS, and compositional methods (sccomp, scCODA, DCATS) as alternatives. Covers the sample-is-the-experimental-unit principle, design/contrast and mixed-model formulas, compositionality of cluster proportions, and FDR across clusters. Use wh...
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add lilinji/GeneTind-Life-Skills --skill bio-flow-cytometry-differential-analysis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Bio Flow Cytometry Differential Analysis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/lilinji-bio-flow-cytometry-differential-analysis)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: bio-flow-cytometry-differential-analysis
description: Differential abundance (DA) and differential state (DS) analysis for flow and mass cytometry - tests which cell populations change in frequency or marker expression between conditions using diffcyt (edgeR/voom/GLMM for DA, limma/LMM for DS), with cydar, CITRUS, and compositional methods (sccomp, scCODA, DCATS) as alternatives. Covers the sample-is-the-experimental-unit principle, design/contrast and mixed-model formulas, compositionality of cluster proportions, and FDR across clusters. Use when comparing populations between groups, choosing a DA method, handling paired/batch designs, or deciding whether compositional correction is needed.
tool_type: r
primary_tool: diffcyt
---
## Version Compatibility
Reference examples tested with: diffcyt 1.22+, CATALYST 1.26+, edgeR 4.0+, limma 3.58+.
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- R: `packageVersion('<pkg>')` then `?function_name` to verify parameters
`testDA_edgeR`/`testDS_limma` are diffcyt functions operating on count/median objects from `calcCounts`/`calcMedians`; the CATALYST-integrated path is the `diffcyt()` wrapper on the SCE. Confirm the signature with `?diffcyt` before relying on it.
# Differential Analysis
**"Compare cell populations between my conditions"** -> Test cluster frequencies (DA) and within-cluster marker expression (DS) between groups, with the sample (not the cell) as the unit.
- R: `diffcyt::diffcyt(sce, analysis_type='DA', method_DA='diffcyt-DA-edgeR', design, contrast)`
- R: `diffcyt(sce, analysis_type='DS', method_DS='diffcyt-DS-limma', ...)`
## The Single Most Important Modern Insight -- The Sample Is the Experimental Unit, Not the Cell
Tens of thousands of cells from one donor are technical PSEUDOREPLICATES, not independent observations. A per-cell test (Wilcoxon across all cells) treats them as n = cells and produces astronomically significant p-values from two mice - it is the single most common statistical sin in modern cytometry (Hurlbert 1984 *Ecol Monogr* 54:187; the cytometry mirror of the scRNA-seq pseudobulk lesson). The correct unit is the SAMPLE/subject: diffcyt aggregates cells to PER-SAMPLE-PER-CLUSTER counts (DA) and PER-SAMPLE-PER-CLUSTER arcsinh-MEDIANS (DS), then tests across samples with edgeR/limma/GLMM (Weber 2019 *Commun Biol* 2:183). Biological replication is mandatory (>= 2-3 per group); DA from a single sample per condition has no valid test. Paired with this: cluster proportions are COMPOSITIONAL (they sum to 1), so a real increase in one population mechanically forces apparent depletion in others - a source of false DA in "unchanged" clusters.
## DA vs DS, and the type/state marker link
- **DA** (differential abundance): does a cluster's FREQUENCY differ? Clusters are defined by TYPE markers.
- **DS** (differential state): within a fixed-identity cluster, does a STATE marker's expression differ? State markers were withheld from clustering for exactly this test.
## Method Taxonomy
| Method | Citation | Mechanism | When to use |
|--------|----------|-----------|-------------|
| diffcyt-DA-edgeR / voom | Weber 2019 *Commun Biol* 2:183 | edgeR/voom empirical-Bayes on per-sample counts; optional TMM | standard 2+ group with replicates (DEFAULT) |
| diffcyt-DA-GLMM / DS-LMM | Weber 2019 | random effects in the formula | paired/repeated-measures/nested (subject random effect) |
| cydar | Lun 2017 *Nat Methods* 14:707 | overlapping hyperspheres + edgeR + spatial FDR | continuum, avoid hard clusters |
| CITRUS | Bruggner 2014 *PNAS* 111:E2770 | hierarchical clustering + LASSO | predictive signature, LARGE n; correlated-not-causal; largely superseded |
| sccomp / scCODA / DCATS | Mangiola 2023 *PNAS* 120:e2203828120 / Buttner 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:6876 / Lin 2023 *Genome Biol* 24:151 | simplex-aware compositional models | strong compositional shift (one pop dominates); DCATS for assignment uncertainty |
## Run diffcyt DA and DS
**Goal:** Test abundance and state on a CATALYST-clustered SCE.
**Approach:** Build design + contrast from `ei(sce)`; the `diffcyt()` wrapper uses the stored clustering. State markers are tested in DS, type markers define DA clusters.
```r
library(CATALYST); library(diffcyt)
sce <- readRDS('sce_clustered.rds')
design <- createDesignMatrix(ei(sce), cols_design = 'condition')
contrast <- createContrast(c(0, 1)) # Treatment vs Control
res_DA <- diffcyt(sce, clustering_to_use = 'meta20',
analysis_type = 'DA', method_DA = 'diffcyt-DA-edgeR',
design = design, contrast = contrast)
res_DS <- diffcyt(sce, clustering_to_use = 'meta20',
analysis_type = 'DS', method_DS = 'diffcyt-DS-limma',
design = design, contrast = contrast)
library(SummarizedExperiment)
rowData(res_DA$res) # cluster_id, logFC, p_val, p_adj (BH across clusters)
```
## Paired / Repeated-Measures (mixed models)
**Goal:** Account for within-subject correlation (e.g. pre/post on the same donor).
**Approach:** Use a GLMM/LMM method with a random effect for subject via a formula.
```r
formula <- createFormula(ei(sce), cols_fixed = 'condition', cols_random = 'patient_id')
res_DA <- diffcyt(sce, clustering_to_use = 'meta20',
analysis_type = 'DA', method_DA = 'diffcyt-DA-GLMM',
formula = formula, contrast = createContrast(c(0, 1)))
```
## Compositional Re-Check
**Goal:** Confirm a headline single-population shift is not inducing artifactual reciprocal depletion.
**Approach:** Re-test with a simplex-aware model when one cluster changes a lot or total yield differs by group.
```r
# If a dominant population expands, the apparent depletion of others may be a simplex artifact.
# Re-test with sccomp / scCODA (reference cell type) / DCATS (assignment uncertainty)
# before reporting reciprocal depletion as independent biology.
```
## Per-Method Failure Modes
### Per-cell pseudoreplication
**Trigger:** Wilcoxon/t-test across all cells. **Mechanism:** cells aren't independent. **Symptom:** p ~ 1e-40 from few subjects. **Fix:** aggregate to per-sample summaries (diffcyt).
### Compositional false DA
**Trigger:** one population expands strongly. **Mechanism:** proportions sum to 1. **Symptom:** significant "depletion" of unrelated clusters. **Fix:** TMM only when total cell abundance is NOT itself the biological signal (else it removes real signal), or a compositional method (sccomp/scCODA/DCATS); report total-yield differences.
### Batch cleaned instead of modeled
**Trigger:** normalizing batch out then testing naively. **Mechanism:** over-correction removes real signal. **Symptom:** attenuated effects. **Fix:** include batch in the design; if batch == condition, no rescue - design it out.
### No replicates
**Trigger:** 1 sample per condition. **Mechanism:** no error term. **Symptom:** uninterpretable p. **Fix:** require >= 2-3 biological replicates per group.
## Quantitative Thresholds
| Threshold | Source | Rationale |
|-----------|--------|-----------|
| >= 2-3 biological replicates per group | Weber 2019 | minimum for a valid DA/DS error term |
| BH FDR across clusters (and clusters x markers for DS) | diffcyt | high-resolution grids have many tests |
| arcsinh median as DS statistic | Nowicka 2017 | robust per-cluster per-sample summary |
## Common Errors
| Error / symptom | Cause | Solution |
|-----------------|-------|----------|
| `testDA_edgeR(sce, ...)` fails | wrong signature | use the `diffcyt()` wrapper on the SCE, or `calcCounts` first |
| results empty | wrong `clustering_to_use` name | match the stored clustering id (e.g. `meta20`) |
| no DS results | state markers not flagged | set `marker_class='state'` in the panel |
| paired design ignored | used fixed-effect method | use `diffcyt-DA-GLMM` with a random effect |
## References
- Weber 2019 *Commun Biol* 2:183 — diffcyt (DA + DS).
- Bruggner 2014 *PNAS* 111(26):E2770-E2777 — CITRUS.
- Lun 2017 *Nat Methods* 14(7):707-709 — cydar hypersphere DA.
- Mangiola 2023 *PNAS* 120(33):e2203828120 — sccomp compositional analysis.
- Buttner 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:6876 — scCODA.
- Lin 2023 *Genome Biol* 24:151 — DCATS (assignment-uncertainty-aware).
- Nowicka 2017 *F1000Research* 6:748 — CyTOF workflow; arcsinh-median DS statistic.
- Hurlbert 1984 *Ecol Monogr* 54(2):187-211 — pseudoreplication.
## Related Skills
- clustering-phenotyping - Cluster (type markers) before testing
- gating-analysis - Compare manually gated population frequencies
- differential-expression/de-results - Shared edgeR/limma output semantics (padj)
- differential-expression/edger-basics - The count-model engine diffcyt reuses
- experimental-design/multiple-testing - FDR across clusters and clusters x markers
- experimental-design/batch-design - Model batch in the design, don't clean it out
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!