Discover your philosophical tradition through behavioral dimension analysis and philosopher matching.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add jongwony/epistemic-protocols --skill sophia --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Sophia?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jongwony-sophia)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: sophia
description: "Discover your philosophical tradition through behavioral dimension analysis and philosopher matching."
---
# Sophia (σοφία)
Discover your philosophical tradition through behavioral pattern analysis.
> φιλο-σοφία = "love of wisdom"
> Your conversation patterns carry the fingerprint of a philosophical tradition.
## When to Use
Invoke this skill when:
- Exploring which philosophical tradition your AI conversation patterns resemble
- Analyzing behavioral dimensions across sessions for epistemic style profiling
- Generating a visual philosopher match profile card
Skip when:
- Analyzing strengths and structural costs (use /curses instead)
- Quick single-protocol question (answer directly)
- No session history exists and user prefers manual exploration
## Pipeline
| Phase | What | Mode |
|-------|------|------|
| 1. Collect | Gather behavioral data from sessions | dimension-profiler agent |
| 2. Match | Map dimension profile to philosophers | AI analysis |
| 3. Present | Dual-layer result + protocol affinity | Gate interaction |
| 4. Report | Generate HTML profile card | Automated |
---
## Phase 1: Data Collection
**Same-session reuse**: If dimension-profiler output is already available in this
conversation (from a prior `/sophia` or `/curses` run), skip Phase 1 entirely and
reuse that output. Both skills produce identical profiler results.
Two-step delegation: first run `coverage-scanner` for pre-aggregated data, then pass
the result to `dimension-profiler` for dimension scoring. This avoids duplicate file
reading and gives the profiler access to protocol usage counts.
**Step 1**: Run `coverage-scanner` agent (see `agents/coverage-scanner.md`):
```
Aggregate facets, session-meta, and slash command data across all sessions.
Return structured coverage data including protocol_counts, friction_summary,
session_type_distribution, tool_counts, and satisfaction_distribution.
```
**Step 2**: Pass coverage output to `dimension-profiler` agent (see `agents/dimension-profiler.md`):
```
Analyze this user's behavioral dimensions from their session data.
coverage_data: [paste coverage-scanner output here]
data_sources:
rules_dir: {config_dir}/rules/
claude_md: {config_dir}/CLAUDE.md
settings_json: {config_dir}/settings.json
data_context: session-enriched
Return the dimension profile table with scores, confidence, and raw signals.
```
When `coverage_data` is provided, omit `sample_size` — the profiler derives
dimensions from aggregate data and does not sample raw files.
If coverage-scanner returns no data (new user with no sessions), skip Step 1 and
run dimension-profiler with `data_sources` only (rules + CLAUDE.md). Note reduced
confidence in results.
---
## Phase 2: Philosopher Matching
Read `references/philosophers.md` for the full philosopher database.
### Matching process
1. Compute similarity score for each philosopher against the user's profile
2. Identify the top match (highest similarity) and runner-up
3. For the top match, identify:
- **Primary alignment**: Which dimension drives the match
- **Divergence points**: Where the user differs from the philosopher
- **Protocol affinity**: Which epistemic protocol aligns with this tradition
### Confidence levels
| Data quality | Match confidence |
|-------------|-----------------|
| 20+ facets sampled, all dimensions measured | High |
| 10-19 facets, most dimensions measured | Medium |
| <10 facets or rules-only analysis | Low — note limitations |
---
## Phase 3: Presentation
Present the match progressively — start with an accessible introduction, then build
to detailed analysis. Users may not know the philosopher; the opening should stand
on its own without assumed knowledge.
### Step 1: Introduction (always show first)
A warm, 2-3 sentence introduction that explains the match in plain language:
```
Your thinking patterns most resemble the tradition of [Philosopher Name]
([dates], [tradition in one phrase]).
[1-2 sentences: what this philosopher is known for, in terms a non-philosopher
would understand. Connect to the user's actual behavior — not abstract philosophy.]
Similarity: 0.XX | Runner-up: [Name] (0.XX)
```
### Step 2: Dimension profile with explanations
Show dimensions with human-readable explanations (from dimension-profiler output)
so users understand what each bar means:
Emit the profile as a table so the harness aligns the columns, and state the
scale once above it — the bar is a 10-cell approximation for comparing
dimensions at a glance, and the Score column carries the measured value (per
the Output Style's pinned rule that a drawn length declares its scale).
Scale: 1 cell ~ 10 points; read exact values from the Score column.
| Dimension | Profile | Score | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 How you approach problems | ████████░░ | 78 | hypothesis-first |
| D2 How much you check | █████████░ | 85 | thorough |
| D3 How you interact | ██████░░░░ | 62 | moderate |
| D4 How you govern work | █████████░ | 91 | systematic |
| D5 Where you focus | ████████░░ | 78 | exploring unknowns |
| D6 How you use AI | █████████░ | 88 | distributed thinking |
Protocol affinity: /[command] ([protocol name] — [Greek])
### Step 3: User choice
```
What would you like to explore?
1. **Deep dive** — Why this tradition fits your patterns, and what it reveals
2. **Compare** — Side-by-side with the runner-up
3. **Protocol** — Try the suggested protocol now
4. **Report** — Generate HTML profile card
```
---
## Phase 4: Report Generation
If the user selects "Report", generate an HTML profile card.
### Report structure
Paths below written `{config_dir}/…` take `{config_dir}` = `CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR` when set, else `~/.claude`. Resolve it ONCE per invocation with Bash `printf '%s\n' "${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR-$HOME/.claude}"` and substitute the absolute result before any Read/Glob/Grep call.
Read the existing CSS design system from `{config_dir}/usage-data/report.html` or
use the design tokens from the cooperative's dashboard/report templates.
**Sections**:
1. **Introduction**: 2-3 sentence accessible summary (who is this philosopher, why you match) before the hero card
2. **Hero**: Philosopher name + tradition + archetype subtitle
3. **Radar chart**: 6-dimension profile as visual (CSS-only, no JS library)
4. **Match analysis**: Why this philosopher, in 3-4 bullet points
5. **Dimension breakdown**: Each dimension with score bar, human-readable explanation, measurement basis, and meaning. Use the explanation column from dimension-profiler output (e.g., "How you approach problems") as subtitle for each bar.
6. **Protocol affinity**: Recommended protocols with one-line rationale
7. **Runner-up**: Brief comparison showing where profiles diverge
**File**: Save to `{config_dir}/usage-data/sophia-profile.html`
Open in browser: `open <filepath>`
### CSS radar chart (no JS dependency)
Use CSS `clip-path: polygon(...)` with computed vertices for a hexagonal radar chart.
Each vertex position is calculated from the dimension score (0-100 mapped to center-to-edge).
---
## Edge Cases
- **New user (<5 sessions)**: Analyze rules/CLAUDE.md only. Present as "Early profile —
based on configuration, not yet behavioral data." Confidence: Low.
- **Balanced profile (all 40-60)**: Use composite archetypes from philosophers.md.
Present as "The Balanced Practitioner (Aristotelian phronesis)" with explanation
that balance itself is a philosophical position.
- **No clear match (all similarities <0.55)**: Present top 2 as "Your profile
doesn't strongly align with a single tradition — you may be synthesizing
multiple approaches." Offer composite archetype.
- **Missing dimensions**: If a dimension can't be computed (no data), mark as
"unmeasured" and exclude from matching. Note which dimensions are missing.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!