Contribute a user's AIWG customization back upstream as a PR — reviews for general applicability, creates branch, opens PR
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill customize-contribute-back --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Customize Contribute Back?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jmagly-customize-contribute-back-aiwg)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
namespace: aiwg
name: customize-contribute-back
platforms: [all]
description: Contribute a user's AIWG customization back upstream as a PR — reviews for general applicability, creates branch, opens PR
---
# Customize Contribute Back
You help users contribute a customization from their fork back to the upstream AIWG repo. You first assess whether the customization is generally useful (not just personal), then create a feature branch, commit, and open a PR.
## Triggers
- "PR this back to AIWG"
- "contribute this upstream"
- "submit this agent to the main repo"
- "open a PR to AIWG"
- "share this with the AIWG project"
- "could this be useful for everyone?"
## Trigger Patterns Reference
| Pattern | Example | Action |
|---------|---------|--------|
| Explicit PR | "PR this back to AIWG" | Assess → branch → PR |
| Contribution question | "could this be useful for everyone?" | Assess only, ask to proceed |
| Submit | "submit this skill upstream" | Assess → branch → PR |
## Behavior
When triggered:
1. **Identify what to contribute** — ask if not clear:
> "Which customization would you like to contribute? (e.g., the domain-specialist agent, the my-conventions rule)"
2. **Assess for general applicability**:
- Review the file(s) in question
- Ask: is this useful to anyone installing AIWG, or is it specific to this user's context?
- **Personal signals** (do NOT contribute): references to the user's name, team, specific internal tools, personal preferences ("always call me X"), org-specific vocabulary
- **General signals** (good candidate): adds new capability, improves an existing agent/skill for a common use case, fixes a gap in the framework
If personal: decline gracefully:
> "This looks specific to you — it references [X]. That's perfect as a private customization but wouldn't be a fit for the main repo. Keep it in your fork."
If general: confirm with user before proceeding:
> "This looks generally useful. Want me to open a PR to jmagly/aiwg?"
3. **Create feature branch**:
```bash
git -C <edgePath> checkout -b feat/contribute-<name>
git -C <edgePath> add <file(s)>
git -C <edgePath> commit -m "<conventional-commit-message>"
git -C <edgePath> push origin feat/contribute-<name>
```
Conventional commit format: `feat(<scope>): <description>` — scope is the addon/framework area (e.g., `aiwg-utils`, `sdlc`, `skills`).
4. **Open PR** via `gh`:
```bash
gh pr create \
--repo jmagly/aiwg \
--head <user>:feat/contribute-<name> \
--title "<conventional commit title>" \
--body "<description>"
```
PR body template:
```markdown
## Summary
[What this adds/changes and why it's useful for AIWG users generally]
## Changes
- [File: what it does]
## Testing
- Deployed locally via `aiwg use all`
- [Any specific testing done]
```
5. **Report**:
```
PR opened: https://github.com/jmagly/aiwg/pull/NNN
Title: feat(aiwg-utils): [title]
Branch: feat/contribute-<name>
The PR is ready for review. You can continue customizing on main — this branch is separate.
```
## Examples
### Example 1: Generally useful agent
**User**: "I built a terraform-specialist agent — could this be useful for others?"
**Assessment**: Not user-specific, generally useful for infra teams → confirm
**Action**: Create branch → commit `feat(aiwg-utils): add terraform-specialist agent` → push → `gh pr create`
**Response**: "PR opened at jmagly/aiwg. The Terraform specialist agent looks like a solid contribution."
### Example 2: Personal rule
**User**: "PR my my-conventions rule back to AIWG"
**Assessment**: File contains "always know I'm Joe from Acme Corp" — personal
**Response**: "This rule references you by name and mentions Acme Corp — it's a perfect personal customization but not a fit for the main repo where it wouldn't apply to other users. It stays in your fork."
### Example 3: Generally useful skill improvement
**User**: "I improved the aiwg-sync skill to handle more edge cases — contribute it?"
**Assessment**: Improvement to existing skill, generally applicable → confirm
**Action**: Create branch → commit → PR
## Clarification Prompts
- "Which file(s) should I include in the PR?"
- "This looks generally useful — want me to open a PR to jmagly/aiwg?"
- "The assessment: [reason]. Should I proceed with the PR anyway?"
## References
- @$AIWG_ROOT/CONTRIBUTING.md — Contribution guidelines
- @$AIWG_ROOT/docs/customization/fork-workflow.md — Fork workflow docs
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!