Use when planning a biological experiment that requires controls, replication, and rigorous methodology to yield valid, reproducible results
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add jeffreytse/grimoire-core --skill design-biological-experiment --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Design Biological Experiment?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jeffreytse-design-biological-experiment)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: design-biological-experiment
description: Use when planning a biological experiment that requires controls, replication, and rigorous methodology to yield valid, reproducible results
source: OECD Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) principles; Fisher "The Design of Experiments" (1935); Cold Spring Harbor Protocols experimental design guidelines
tags: [biology, experiment-design, scientific-method, reproducibility]
verified: true
---
# Design Biological Experiment
Structure a biological experiment with controls, replication, and statistical power to produce valid, reproducible results.
## Why This Is Best Practice
**Adopted by:** OECD member nations (GLP compliance), NIH-funded research programs, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, peer-reviewed journals requiring ARRIVE/CONSORT reporting.
**Impact:** Fisher's randomized block design reduced experimental error by 30–50% in agricultural trials; GLP-compliant studies have a 60% lower rate of retraction vs. non-compliant studies (Fanelli 2012).
**Why best:** Randomization eliminates selection bias; replication separates signal from noise; blinding prevents observer bias — together these are the minimal conditions for causal inference in biology.
Sources: OECD GLP Principles (ENV/MC/CHEM(98)17); Fisher (1935); Cold Spring Harbor Protocols experimental design series.
## Steps
1. **State the hypothesis** — write a single falsifiable statement in IF-THEN-BECAUSE form (e.g., "If gene X is knocked out, then cell proliferation will decrease by >20%, because X activates the MAPK pathway").
2. **Identify variables** — list independent variable (what you manipulate), dependent variable (what you measure), and all confounders you will control.
3. **Define controls** — include a positive control (known outcome), negative control (no treatment), and vehicle control (solvent only) for every experimental group.
4. **Calculate sample size** — use power analysis (α=0.05, β=0.20, effect size from pilot or literature) before starting; target ≥80% power. See `calculate-statistical-power`.
5. **Assign randomization** — randomly assign subjects/samples to groups using a random number table or software (R, Python) to prevent systematic bias.
6. **Plan blinding** — blind the experimenter to group assignment during measurement wherever feasible; use coded labels.
7. **Write the protocol** — document each step with exact reagent concentrations, instrument settings, timing, and acceptance criteria for data quality.
8. **Specify statistical analysis** — pre-register the primary statistical test, multiple-comparison correction method, and exclusion criteria before data collection.
9. **Execute and record** — record all deviations from protocol in a lab notebook contemporaneously; photograph key results.
10. **Validate reproducibility** — replicate the key experiment ≥3 times on separate days (biological replicates, not just technical replicates).
## Rules
- Never pool technical replicates as if they were biological replicates — they do not increase statistical power.
- Pre-register hypothesis and analysis plan before data collection to prevent HARKing (Hypothesizing After Results are Known).
- Include both positive and negative controls in every assay run, not just the initial validation.
- Report all exclusions and deviations — omitting failed runs is a form of reporting bias.
## Common Mistakes
- **Pseudoreplication** — treating technical replicates as biological replicates inflates n and produces false precision.
- **No positive control** — without a positive control, a negative result cannot be distinguished from assay failure.
- **Post-hoc hypothesis** — fitting the hypothesis to observed data destroys Type I error control and is a form of p-hacking.
- **Ignoring batch effects** — running treatment and control groups on different days or with different reagent lots introduces confounders.
## When NOT to Use
- When performing purely observational or descriptive studies (use appropriate survey or cohort design instead)
- When ethical or feasibility constraints prevent randomization (use quasi-experimental design with explicit limitation disclosure)
- When the research question is exploratory/hypothesis-generating (use pilot study design with no inferential statistics)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!