Use when evaluating the strength and validity of an investment thesis before committing capital
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add jeffreytse/grimoire-core --skill audit-investment-thesis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Audit Investment Thesis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jeffreytse-audit-investment-thesis)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: audit-investment-thesis
description: Use when evaluating the strength and validity of an investment thesis before committing capital
source: Charlie Munger's "Poor Charlie's Almanack"; Howard Marks memos (Oaktree Capital); Seth Klarman "Margin of Safety"
tags: [finance, investing, thesis, due-diligence, mental-models, margin-of-safety]
verified: true
---
# Audit Investment Thesis
Stress-test an investment thesis using systematic mental models and adversarial questioning.
## Why This Is Best Practice
**Adopted by:** Berkshire Hathaway, Oaktree Capital, top-tier value investors; taught at Columbia Business School Value Investing Program
**Impact:** Howard Marks' memos document that second-level thinking and explicit thesis auditing reduce permanent capital loss; Munger's "checklist" method is credited with Berkshire's long-run outperformance.
**Why best:** A thesis audit forces inversion — asking "how could this be wrong?" before "why will this work?" Explicit pre-mortems catch errors of omission (what you didn't consider) that optimistic analysis routinely misses. Requiring a margin of safety quantifies the price of being wrong.
## Steps
1. **State the thesis in one paragraph** — A thesis you cannot summarize clearly is a thesis you do not understand; require a concise statement of the core variant view vs. consensus.
2. **Identify the key assumptions** — List 3–5 assumptions the thesis requires to be true; rank them by impact and fragility.
3. **Apply inversion (pre-mortem)** — Assume the investment loses 50% over 3 years; write down the most plausible path that leads there; this surfaces hidden risks.
4. **Check the base rate** — What percentage of similar investments have succeeded historically? Anchor expectations to base rates before adjusting for specific factors.
5. **Assess the moat** — Evaluate competitive advantage: cost advantage, switching costs, network effects, intangible assets (brands, patents); use Morningstar's five-source framework.
6. **Stress-test valuation and margin of safety** — Discount intrinsic value estimate by 25–30% to establish a safe entry price; the thesis is only actionable below this price.
7. **Identify the falsifying event** — Define in advance what data would prove the thesis wrong; this prevents sunk-cost rationalization later.
8. **Document and sign off** — Write up the audit findings; revisit at least quarterly or when a key assumption changes.
## Rules
- Never invest without an explicit margin of safety; price always matters.
- Always invert: "What would have to be true for this to fail?" before "What would have to be true for this to succeed?"
- Require that the thesis rests on no more than 3 critical assumptions; more complexity means more failure points.
- Distinguish between risk (known unknowns with probabilities) and uncertainty (unknown unknowns); price appropriately for both.
- Update the thesis when facts change; do not confuse stubbornness with conviction.
## Examples
**Thesis under audit:** "Company X will triple revenue in 3 years via AI-driven upsell." Key assumptions: (1) AI product achieves 40% attach rate, (2) net revenue retention stays >120%, (3) competitive moat holds. Inversion: attach rate stalls at 15% due to integration friction → revenue grows 60% not 3×. Margin of safety: intrinsic value $80/share → entry only below $56. Falsifying event: two consecutive quarters of NRR below 110%.
## Common Mistakes
- **Confirmation bias in research** — Seeking only supporting evidence; deliberately assign a team member to argue the bear case.
- **Anchoring to purchase price** — The market does not know or care what you paid; evaluate the thesis on current facts, not sunk cost.
- **Ignoring second-order effects** — The investment may be right but too crowded; consider what happens when consensus agrees with you.
---
> **Finance disclaimer:** This skill encodes professional best practices for educational purposes. It is not financial advice. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!