Validate and iterate on the SDLC Layer Separation Architecture implementation across the check categories defined in its Evaluation Checklist — cross-references, doc completeness, knowledge-explorer layer filters, research entry metadata, integration points, and plan consistency. Produces a structured findings report and optionally applies safe fixes. Use when validating a first-pass implementation, before claiming layer work complete, auditing layer docs or schema, or running --dry-run to pr...
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills --skill evaluate-sdlc-layers --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Evaluate Sdlc Layers?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/jamie-bitflight-evaluate-sdlc-layers)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: evaluate-sdlc-layers
description: Validate and iterate on the SDLC Layer Separation Architecture implementation across the check categories defined in its Evaluation Checklist — cross-references, doc completeness, knowledge-explorer layer filters, research entry metadata, integration points, and plan consistency. Produces a structured findings report and optionally applies safe fixes. Use when validating a first-pass implementation, before claiming layer work complete, auditing layer docs or schema, or running --dry-run to preview findings without changes.
argument-hint: '[--dry-run | --fix]'
user-invocable: true
---
# Evaluate SDLC Layers
Systematically evaluate the SDLC Layer Separation Architecture implementation and support iterative improvement. Treats the implementation as first-pass until validated.
## Arguments
- **`--dry-run`** — Run all checks, produce report only. Do not apply fixes.
- **`--fix`** — After evaluation, apply safe fixes for broken references, missing metadata, or obvious gaps. Report what was changed.
- (no args) — Evaluate and produce report; offer to fix or delegate fixes.
---
## Evaluation Checklist
Run each check and record PASS / FAIL / SKIP with evidence.
### 1. Cross-Reference Validation
For each linked path in `plugins/development-harness/docs/sdlc-layers/` and related docs:
- [ ] `sam-definition.md` — exists at `plugins/development-harness/skills/work-backlog-item/references/sam-definition.md`
- [ ] `plugins/development-harness/CLAUDE.md` — exists
- [ ] `stateless-agent-methodology/research/arl/PROVENANCE.md` — exists (sibling repo or configured path)
- [ ] Layer 0 docs → `TASK_FILE_FORMAT.md` — exists at `plugins/development-harness/docs/TASK_FILE_FORMAT.md`
- [ ] Layer 1 → `language-manifest-schema.md`, `role-resolution-protocol.md` — exist in development-harness
- [ ] Layer 2 → `plugins/development-harness/docs/sdlc-layers/layer-2/` — exists with README, schema, pilot profiles
- [ ] Layer-0 redirect stubs (`artifact-conventions.md`, `task-file-format.md`, `sam-pipeline.md`, `arl-touchpoints.md`) contain redirect pointers to canonical locations. Validate each redirect target exists.
**Evidence:** List each path checked and result (exists / 404 / wrong content).
---
### 2. Doc Completeness
- [ ] Layer 0 content files (6): README, rt-ica-gate, verification-protocol, evidence-discipline, orchestrator-discipline, context-fit-complexity
- [ ] Layer 0 redirect stubs (4): sam-pipeline, arl-touchpoints, artifact-conventions, task-file-format — each must contain a redirect pointing to its canonical skill reference location
- [ ] Layer 1: All 6 docs present (README, layer-1-overview, language-manifest-template, linting-discovery-protocol, workflow-pattern-taxonomy, harness-role-mapping)
- [ ] Layer 2: README, layer-2-overview, stack-profile-schema, stack-profile-template; pilot profiles python-fastapi, python-cli
- [ ] ARL: arl-meta-layer.md, arl-human-probing-design.md
**Evidence:** `Glob` or `Read` results for each expected file.
---
### 3. Knowledge-Explorer Layer Filter
- [ ] `uv run research/knowledge-explorer.py list --layer 0` — returns entries with `layer: "0"`
- [ ] `uv run research/knowledge-explorer.py list --layer 1` — returns entries with `layer: "1"`
- [ ] `uv run research/knowledge-explorer.py list --layer 2` — returns entries with `layer: "2"`
- [ ] Entries without layer metadata are excluded when `--layer` is used (expected)
**Evidence:** Paste command output for each.
---
### 4. Research Entry Layer Metadata
- [ ] `evaluation-testing/harness-engineering-openai.md` — has `layer: "0"`
- [ ] `api-frameworks/fastapi.md`, `api-frameworks/tornado.md` — have `layer: "2"`, `language`, `stack`
- [ ] `developer-tools/copier-astral.md` — has `layer: "1"` (or `2` if stack-scaffold)
- [ ] `research/README.md` — has "Layer Mapping" section
**Evidence:** Grep for `layer:` in frontmatter of each.
---
### 5. Integration Points
- [ ] `work-backlog-item` SKILL — documents `--language`, `--stack`; references layer docs
- [ ] `groom-backlog-item` SKILL — documents ARL human-probing integration; references arl-human-probing-design
- [ ] `language-manifest-schema.md` — has "Inherits from Layer 0"; `typecheck: (none)`; Conventions schema
- [ ] `role-resolution-protocol.md` — has "Layer 0 gates apply before role resolution"
- [ ] `plugins/development-harness/CLAUDE.md` — references layer model
**Evidence:** Grep or Read for key phrases.
---
### 6. Consistency with Plan
- [ ] Plan deliverables (from attached plan) — compare File and Directory Changes table to actual files
- [ ] Dependency order — Layer 0 → Layer 1 → Layer 2 → Research → SAM/ARL → ARL probing → work-backlog-item
**Evidence:** List any plan items not yet implemented or diverged.
---
## Output Format
Produce a structured report:
```text
## SDLC Layer Evaluation Report
Date: {YYYY-MM-DD}
### Summary
- Cross-Reference: {PASS|FAIL|PARTIAL} — {brief}
- Doc Completeness: {PASS|FAIL|PARTIAL}
- Knowledge-Explorer: {PASS|FAIL|PARTIAL}
- Research Metadata: {PASS|FAIL|PARTIAL}
- Integration Points: {PASS|FAIL|PARTIAL}
- Plan Consistency: {PASS|FAIL|PARTIAL}
### Findings
1. [Category] {finding} — {suggested fix}
2. ...
### Recommended Actions
- [ ] {action 1}
- [ ] {action 2}
```
---
## Iteration
After evaluation:
1. **If `--fix`**: Apply safe fixes (broken paths, missing frontmatter fields, obvious typos). Report each change.
2. **If no `--fix`**: Present findings; offer to create backlog items or apply fixes.
3. **Re-run**: After fixes, re-run evaluation to confirm improvements.
---
## Experiments
Flow experiments and learnings live in [sam-flow-experiments](https://github.com/Jamie-BitFlight/sam-flow-experiments). Clone via SSH: `git clone git@github.com:Jamie-BitFlight/sam-flow-experiments.git`. When iterating, consider running experiments against concept fixtures to validate changes.
---
## References
- [SDLC Layers](../../../plugins/development-harness/docs/sdlc-layers/)
- [verify-done](../../../plugins/development-harness/skills/verify-done/SKILL.md) — evidence discipline
- [groom-backlog-item](../../../plugins/development-harness/skills/groom-backlog-item/SKILL.md) — orchestration pattern
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!