Generates a fully structured SEO content brief for a target keyword and optionally pushes it to a Notion database. Use this skill whenever the user says 'create a content brief', 'brief this keyword', 'run a content brief for', 'generate a brief', 'write a brief for [keyword]', 'content brief on [topic]', or any variation where someone needs a keyword researched and turned into a structured writing assignment with H1, H2 outline, FAQ, internal links, word count target, and writer notes. Also ...
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills --skill content-brief --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Content Brief?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/infrasity-labs-content-brief-dev-gtm-claude-skills)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: content-brief
description: "Generates a fully structured SEO content brief for a target keyword and optionally pushes it to a Notion database. Use this skill whenever the user says 'create a content brief', 'brief this keyword', 'run a content brief for', 'generate a brief', 'write a brief for [keyword]', 'content brief on [topic]', or any variation where someone needs a keyword researched and turned into a structured writing assignment with H1, H2 outline, FAQ, internal links, word count target, and writer notes. Also triggers when the user provides a keyword and asks for an SEO brief, editorial brief, or writing spec. Outputs a mandatory structured format that the text parser maps directly to Notion properties. Supports single-keyword and batch (CSV) modes."
metadata:
---
# Content Brief — Keyword-to-Notion Brief Generator
Generates a structured SEO content brief from a target keyword. Output follows the mandatory Direction prompt format so the `text_parser.py` script can extract every field for Notion without manual cleanup.
## Invocation Triggers
**Explicit phrases** (any of):
- "create a content brief for [keyword]"
- "brief this keyword: [keyword]"
- "content brief on [topic]"
- "generate a brief for [keyword]"
- "write a brief for [keyword]"
- "run the content brief skill"
**Implicit signals:**
- User provides a keyword and asks for an SEO spec, editorial spec, or writing assignment
- User pastes a keyword list and asks for briefs
When triggered, run immediately — no upfront intake beyond the keyword itself.
## Grill-Me Intake (One Question, Optional)
Run the brief without questions when the keyword is clear.
Ask **one** clarifying question only when **both** are true:
1. The target audience or client is not inferrable from context
2. Audience changes the content angle meaningfully (e.g., "project management software" could target PMs or developers)
> **Quick clarification — who is the primary audience for "[keyword]"?**
> 1. [Inferred persona A — e.g., HR Director]
> 2. [Inferred persona B — e.g., Operations Manager]
> 3. Tell me
>
> *Why I'm asking: audience shapes the H1, content angle, and writer notes. One question prevents a wrong brief.*
Max one question. If audience is inferable, skip and proceed.
## Data Gathering (Before Writing the Brief)
Run these steps before generating the Direction prompt output:
### Step 1 — Keyword Metrics
**Preferred:** Ahrefs MCP (`keywords_explorer_overview`) → volume, KD, CPC, SERP data.
**Fallback (no Ahrefs MCP):** Use WebSearch to estimate:
- Search `[keyword] search volume KD CPC site:ahrefs.com OR site:semrush.com OR site:moz.com`
- Extract available volume/KD/CPC estimates
- If no data found, set VOLUME/CPC/DIFFICULTY to `[not available — add manually]`
### Step 2 — Competitor H2/H3 Analysis
- WebSearch `[keyword]` → identify top 3 organic results (skip ads, maps, featured snippets)
- WebFetch each URL → extract all H2 and H3 headings
- Note: competitor structure informs the H2_OUTLINE. Do not copy — use as gap analysis.
### Step 3 — Search Intent Classification
Based on keyword + SERP type, classify as one of exactly four options:
- `Informational` — user wants to learn
- `Commercial` — user is comparing options before buying
- `Transactional` — user is ready to act/purchase
- `Navigational` — user seeks a specific brand/site
### Step 4 — Priority Scoring
Apply routing logic from `references/routing-logic.md`:
- HIGH: Volume > 200 AND KD < 40 AND intent is Commercial or Transactional
- MEDIUM: Doesn't meet HIGH criteria but has meaningful volume or strategic importance
- LOW: Low volume, high difficulty, or informational with limited conversion value
## Direction Prompt Output Format (Mandatory)
**This format is non-negotiable.** The `text_parser.py` script performs label-exact extraction. If any label deviates from the format below — wrong case, extra space, missing underscore — the Notion property will arrive empty.
After data gathering, output the brief using EXACTLY this structure:
```
TARGET_KEYWORD: [keyword]
VOLUME: [number or "not available"]
CPC: [decimal or "not available"]
DIFFICULTY: [0-100 integer or "not available"]
SEARCH_INTENT: [Informational | Commercial | Transactional | Navigational]
AUDIENCE: [persona — job title or role]
RECOMMENDED_H1: [final proposed title]
CONTENT_ANGLE: [one paragraph describing the unique angle, why this beats competitors, what the post must do]
WORD_COUNT: [number]
SCHEMA: [schema type — e.g., FAQ, HowTo, Article, FAQ + HowTo]
PRIORITY: [HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
H2_OUTLINE:
- H2: [heading]
- H3: [subheading]
- H3: [subheading]
- H2: [heading]
- H3: [subheading]
FAQ:
- Q: [question the audience actually searches]
- Q: [question]
- Q: [question]
INTERNAL_LINKS:
- [anchor text] → [relative URL or page title if URL unknown]
WRITER_NOTES:
[one paragraph of specific guidance: tone, POV, what to avoid, key differentiators to emphasize, CTAs, any client-specific requirements]
```
**Critical rules:**
- Every field label must appear exactly as shown (ALL_CAPS with underscores)
- SEARCH_INTENT value must exactly match one of the four options (capitalized)
- PRIORITY value must be exactly HIGH, MEDIUM, or LOW
- H2_OUTLINE, FAQ, INTERNAL_LINKS, WRITER_NOTES are block fields — content follows on the next line(s)
- No additional text before TARGET_KEYWORD or after WRITER_NOTES block
## Workflow Architecture (9 Nodes)
| Node | Role | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| 1 — Input | Accept keyword + optional client/audience context | User message |
| 2 — Keyword Metrics | Pull volume, KD, CPC, SERP type | Ahrefs MCP OR WebSearch fallback |
| 3 — SERP Scrape | Extract H2/H3 from top 3 organic results | WebFetch |
| 4 — Brief Generation | Process data through Direction prompt → structured output | Claude (this skill) |
| 5 — Text Parser | Extract labeled fields → structured variables | `scripts/text_parser.py` |
| 6 — Conditional Router | Route based on PRIORITY value | Routing logic |
| 7A — Notion Create (HIGH) | Create page, Status = "Briefed: Ready for Assignment" | Notion MCP |
| 7B — Notion Create (MED/LOW) | Create page, Status = "Briefed: Weekly Review Queue" | Notion MCP |
| 8A — Slack Notify (HIGH only) | Post brief summary + Notion link to channel | Slack MCP |
| 9 — Calendar Sync | Create linked entry in Content Calendar database | Notion MCP |
In Claude Code without MCP connectors: Nodes 1–5 run automatically. Nodes 6–9 produce a ready-to-paste summary and instruct the user on manual Notion entry.
## Batch Processing Mode
Trigger: user provides a CSV with a `Target Keyword` column (optional `Priority Override` column).
Process:
1. Confirm CSV is readable and `Target Keyword` column exists
2. Run each keyword through the full pipeline sequentially
3. Output all briefs in sequence, separated by `---`
4. After all briefs: output a summary table (keyword | priority | word count | schema)
Expected throughput: 20 briefs in 20–25 minutes (60–75 seconds per brief).
If any keyword fails (no SERP data, ambiguous intent): note it in the summary table as `[FAILED — reason]` and continue processing remaining keywords.
## Notion Push (When MCP Available)
Map parser output to Notion properties using `references/notion-schema.md`.
Two paths based on PRIORITY:
**HIGH:**
- Status → "Briefed: Ready for Assignment"
- Target Publish Date → today + 14 days
- Trigger Slack notification (Node 8A)
**MEDIUM:**
- Status → "Briefed: Weekly Review Queue"
- Target Publish Date → today + 28 days
**LOW:**
- Status → "Briefed: Weekly Review Queue"
- Target Publish Date → today + 42 days
After page creation: run Calendar Sync (Node 9) to create linked entry in Content Calendar database.
Pre-check before creating: query Notion for existing page with same TARGET_KEYWORD. If found → route to `update_page` instead of `create_page` to prevent duplicates.
## Multi-Client Setup
Each client has:
- Separate Notion integration token
- Separate database ID
- Client-specific Direction prompt variant (adjust audience, tone, internal link base URLs)
Onboarding a new client: ~45–60 minutes to configure connector + test one brief end-to-end.
## Output When Notion MCP Is Not Connected
If Notion MCP is not available, after generating the Direction prompt output, append:
```
---
NOTION PUSH: Not connected. To add this brief to Notion manually:
1. Open your Notion database
2. Create a new page
3. Paste the following field values:
[formatted summary of all extracted fields]
Or run: python scripts/text_parser.py brief.txt --output json
to get a JSON payload ready for the Notion API.
---
```
## Validation Gate
After generating output, mentally verify:
- All 11 simple fields are present and non-empty
- SEARCH_INTENT is one of the 4 valid values
- PRIORITY is exactly HIGH, MEDIUM, or LOW
- H2_OUTLINE has at least 4 H2s each with at least 1 H3
- FAQ has at least 3 questions
- INTERNAL_LINKS has at least 2 entries
- WRITER_NOTES is a substantive paragraph (not a placeholder)
Run `scripts/brief_validator.py` on the output file for automated validation.
## Error Handling
| Situation | Behavior |
|---|---|
| No keyword data available | Set numeric fields to "not available", add note in WRITER_NOTES instructing editor to verify manually |
| SERP scrape blocked (403/paywalled) | Skip scrape, note "competitor outline not available" in WRITER_NOTES, proceed with brief |
| Ambiguous search intent | Default to Informational; flag in WRITER_NOTES: "Intent ambiguous — verify before briefing writer" |
| Select value mismatch in Notion | Capitalize values exactly; Notion select is case-sensitive |
| Duplicate keyword detected | Route to update_page instead of create_page |
| >2 empty properties in parsed brief | Flag for manual review; do not push to Notion |
| Batch keyword fails | Note in summary table, continue processing |
| CSV missing Target Keyword column | Stop and ask user to confirm column name |
See `references/error-handling.md` for full failure-point catalog.
## Tooling
| Script | Role |
|---|---|
| `scripts/text_parser.py` | Extracts labeled fields from Direction prompt output → structured dict. `python text_parser.py brief.txt --output json` |
| `scripts/brief_validator.py` | Validates all required fields are present, values are in allowed sets. `python brief_validator.py brief.txt` |
## References
- `references/notion-schema.md` — Notion database property config (names, types, allowed values)
- `references/routing-logic.md` — Priority scoring rules and publish date calculations
- `references/error-handling.md` — Known failure points and fixes
## Anti-Patterns To Reject
- Deviating from the mandatory Direction prompt label format (breaks parser)
- Using lowercase or mixed-case field labels (TARGET_KEYWORD not Target_Keyword)
- Putting SEARCH_INTENT outside the four allowed values
- Generating a brief without first gathering keyword + SERP data
- Asking multiple intake questions before running
- Writing vague WRITER_NOTES ("write a good post about this topic")
- Fabricating keyword metrics when data is unavailable — always flag as "not available"
- Pushing to Notion when >2 fields are empty
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!