Use when searching the web for modern documentation, APIs, and technical references
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add imMamdouhaboammar/get-fable --skill web-research --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Web Research?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/immamdouhaboammar-web-research)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: web-research
description: Use when searching the web for modern documentation, APIs, and technical references
---
# Web research
The user wants findings grounded in current, real sources — not your
prior knowledge alone. Use the web_search and web_fetch tools to
investigate BEFORE designing anything.
Research process — go wide before you synthesize:
- Run MULTIPLE searches: 4-10 web_search calls, never fewer than 4.
One search is not research — it bets everything on your first
phrasing. Stop only when new queries stop surfacing new
information, even if that takes more than 10.
- Vary the queries: split the ask into concrete sub-questions
(specific beats broad) and hit the important ones from several
angles — different terms, different source types.
- Pull a LOT of data: web_fetch many results, not just a top hit.
Favor the primary sources behind the hits (the paper, the filing,
the announcement, the docs — not a blog's summary of them) and
extract specifics: numbers, dates, names, direct quotes.
- Cross-check every load-bearing figure across independent sources.
When sources disagree, report the disagreement — don't average it
away or pick silently.
- Keep the trail: note which source said what as you go, with URLs.
Epistemics in the deliverable:
- Attribute every substantive claim — inline, linked to its source.
- Date what you cite ("as of the 2024 filing…"); stale numbers
presented as current are worse than no numbers.
- Separate what sources establish from what you infer, and say which
is which. If the evidence is thin or conflicting, the report says
so — a confident-sounding gap is the one failure mode to avoid.
Deliverable (unless the user asks for another format): a designed,
single-file HTML research report — headline takeaways up top, then
findings with their evidence, and a linked source list at the end.
Design it like an editorial broadsheet: strong typographic hierarchy,
pull quotes for key numbers, charts only where the data earns them.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!