'Use when you have untargeted HRMS data and want to screen for a defined
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add HolobiomicsLab/asb-skill-collections --skill suspect-screening-exposomics --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Suspect Screening Exposomics?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/holobiomicslab-suspect-screening-exposomics)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: suspect-screening-exposomics-workflow
description: 'Use when you have untargeted HRMS data and want to screen for a defined
suspect list of environmental / exposure-relevant compounds — detect features, match
them to suspect-list entries by exact mass/RT/MS2, elucidate structures of hits
by in-silico fragmentation, and assign identification confidence levels (Schymanski),
producing a confidence-annotated suspect-hit table.
'
license: CC-BY-4.0
metadata:
kind: composite-workflow
collection: https://w3id.org/holobiomicslab/asb-skill/collection/metabolomics/v2
techniques:
- LC-MS
stage_count: 5
member_skills:
- peak-detection-and-mass-alignment
- mass-spectrometry-feature-table-construction
- mass-spectrometry-feature-detection-validation
- non-targeted-preprocessing-tool-comparison
- non-targeted-feature-detection-and-screening
- suspect-database-matching
- ms1-feature-extraction
- mass-spectrometry-screening-workflows
- multi-criterion-scoring-integration
- feature-annotation-with-chemical-descriptors
- in-silico-fragmentation-prediction
- candidate-structure-ranking
- candidate-rank-scoring
- fragment-ion-scoring-and-ranking
- candidate-structure-ranking-from-spectrum
- compound-annotation-confidence-assessment
- metabolite-annotation-confidence-assignment
- annotation-confidence-assessment
- annotation-scoring-and-ranking
- bayesian-annotation-probability-inference
- feature-metadata-annotation
- chemical-structure-validation
- reference-compound-verification
member_tools:
- MZmine2
- Optimus
- OpenMS
- R Shiny
- EISA-EXPOSOME
- T3DB
- MAGMa
- PubChem
- masscube
- Python
- msFeaST
- jupyter-notebook
- msFeaST Dashboard bundle
coverage_gaps: []
derived_from_workflows:
- coll_ms2deepscore
- coll_metabodirect
bound_by: perspicacite-semantic
schema_version: 0.3.0
attribution:
generator: AgenticScienceBuilder
promoter: Louis-Félix Nothias
sponsor: CNRS & Université Côte d'Azur
zenodo_doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20794027
---
# Suspect Screening for Exposomics (suspect lists -> confidence-levelled IDs)
## Summary
HRMS in, a confidence-levelled suspect-hit table out: suspect-list matching, in-silico fragmentation, and identification-confidence assignment for exposomics.
## When to use
Use when you have untargeted HRMS data and want to screen for a defined suspect list of environmental / exposure-relevant compounds — detect features, match them to suspect-list entries by exact mass/RT/MS2, elucidate structures of hits by in-silico fragmentation, and assign identification confidence levels (Schymanski), producing a confidence-annotated suspect-hit table.
## When NOT to use
- The data is not LC-MS.
- You need a single atomic step, not the full pipeline (use the leaf skill directly via the router).
## Stages
### Stage 1 — preprocess
**Goal:** raw HRMS -> feature table + MS2 export
**EDAM operation:** operation_3215
**Inputs:** mzML · **Outputs:** feature-table, mgf/gnps-fbmn
**Candidate leaf skills:** `peak-detection-and-mass-alignment` (primary), `mass-spectrometry-feature-table-construction`, `mass-spectrometry-feature-detection-validation`, `non-targeted-preprocessing-tool-comparison`, `non-targeted-feature-detection-and-screening`
**Tools (primary):** MZmine2, Optimus, OpenMS
**Other candidate tools:** Python, pyOpenMS, MSConvert, PFΔScreen, mzRAPP, MZmine 2, R, XCMS, enviPat, Skyline, R (with mzRAPP library), pymzml, pandas, numpy, scipy, joblib, tqdm, tqdm_joblib, matplotlib
**Grounding:** 4 KB(s); DOIs: 10.1007/s00216-023-05070-2, 10.1021/acs.analchem.5c00060, 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00737, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab231/6214530
### Stage 2 — suspect_match
**Goal:** features -> suspect-list matches by exact mass / RT / MS2
**EDAM operation:** operation_3631
**Inputs:** feature-table, mgf/gnps-fbmn · **Outputs:** tsv
**Candidate leaf skills:** `suspect-database-matching` (primary), `ms1-feature-extraction`, `mass-spectrometry-screening-workflows`, `multi-criterion-scoring-integration`, `feature-annotation-with-chemical-descriptors`
**Tools (primary):** R Shiny, EISA-EXPOSOME, T3DB
**Other candidate tools:** Scannotation, patRoon, XCMS, OpenMS, BioTransformer, CTS, MetFrag, SIRIUS, CAMERA, RAMClustR, ProteoWizard, Python, pyOpenMS, MSConvert, PFΔScreen
**Grounding:** 4 KB(s); DOIs: 10.1007/s00216-023-05070-2, 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02697, 10.1021/acs.est.3c04764, 10.1186/s13321-020-00477-w
### Stage 3 — in_silico_fragment
**Goal:** suspect hits -> in-silico fragmentation structure ranking (MetFrag / SIRIUS)
**EDAM operation:** operation_3860
**Inputs:** tsv, mgf/gnps-fbmn · **Outputs:** tsv
**Candidate leaf skills:** `in-silico-fragmentation-prediction` (primary), `candidate-structure-ranking`, `candidate-rank-scoring`, `fragment-ion-scoring-and-ranking`, `candidate-structure-ranking-from-spectrum`
**Tools (primary):** MAGMa, PubChem
**Other candidate tools:** Python, pyrwr, MetFrag, ChemWalker, DiffSpectra, Diffusion Molecule Transformer (DMT), SpecFormer, Spectra, SIRIUS, R, RDKit, PubChemPy, MetaboAnnotatoR, R (version or higher), xcms, RamClustR, ICEBERG WebUI, SCARF
**Grounding:** 6 KB(s); DOIs: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03032, 10.1038/s42256-024-00816-8, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad078/7067745, 10.1186/s13321-023-00695-y …
### Stage 4 — confidence
**Goal:** assign identification confidence levels (Schymanski 1-5) to hits
**EDAM operation:** operation_0224
**Inputs:** tsv · **Outputs:** tsv
**Candidate leaf skills:** `compound-annotation-confidence-assessment` (primary), `metabolite-annotation-confidence-assignment`, `annotation-confidence-assessment`, `annotation-scoring-and-ranking`, `bayesian-annotation-probability-inference`
**Tools (primary):** masscube, Python
**Other candidate tools:** R, XCMS, MS-Dial, GetFeatistics, patRoon, MS-CleanR, MS-FINDER, commons-math3, jfreechart, jopt-simple, trove4j, Passatutto, ipaPy2
**Grounding:** 5 KB(s); DOIs: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01594, 10.1038/s41467-025-60640-5, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad455, 10.1515/jib-2025-0047 …
### Stage 5 — report
**Goal:** consolidate suspect hits + structures + confidence into an annotated table
**EDAM operation:** operation_3434
**Inputs:** tsv, feature-table · **Outputs:** tsv
**Candidate leaf skills:** `feature-metadata-annotation` (primary), `chemical-structure-validation`, `reference-compound-verification`
**Tools (primary):** msFeaST, jupyter-notebook, msFeaST Dashboard bundle
**Other candidate tools:** RDKit, PubChemPy, Python, SIRIUS, MetFrag, R Shiny, EISA-EXPOSOME
**Grounding:** 3 KB(s); DOIs: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02697, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae584, 10.1186/s13321-023-00695-y
## Grounding
Each stage carries the `kb_slugs`/`dois` of the leaves it draws on. Ground any stage against its source paper with the collection's `/ground` command or `bin/perspicacite_kb_bind.py` (Perspicacité KB; serverless local-clone fallback).
## Verification contract
`workflow.yaml` is gradable by `asb solve-workflow` (checkpoint mode). Each stage declares typed outputs; the final stage emits the master deliverable.
## Provenance
Generated by `compose_workflows.py` (semantic binding + EDAM-aware primary selection). `derived_from_workflows` lists ASB per-paper workflows whose structure corroborated this pipeline — the eval-ablation set (SPEC §8). Staging only; promote via `release_gate.py`.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!