Brain alignment methodology for comparing Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and Large-Action Models (LAMs) against human fMRI during naturalistic interactive tasks. Studies how reasoning-focused vs action-focused prompts shape model internal representations and their alignment with brain activity across the cortical hierarchy. Use when: evaluating interactive AI model brain alignment, comparing VLM vs LAM neural representations, studying prompt-driven representation changes, designing fMRI encodi...
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill vlm-lam-brain-alignment --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Vlm Lam Brain Alignment?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-vlm-lam-brain-alignment)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: vlm-lam-brain-alignment
description: >
Brain alignment methodology for comparing Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and
Large-Action Models (LAMs) against human fMRI during naturalistic interactive
tasks. Studies how reasoning-focused vs action-focused prompts shape model
internal representations and their alignment with brain activity across the
cortical hierarchy. Use when: evaluating interactive AI model brain alignment,
comparing VLM vs LAM neural representations, studying prompt-driven
representation changes, designing fMRI encoding studies with foundation models,
analyzing cortical processing hierarchy alignment. Triggered by: VLM brain
alignment, LAM fMRI encoding, vision-language model neuroscience, action model
brain comparison, prompt-symmetric representations, prompt-asymmetric
representations, interactive gameplay fMRI, reasoning action alignment,
cortical hierarchy encoding, Oota 2026.
---
# VLM-LAM Brain Alignment Methodology
Compare how Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and Large-Action Models (LAMs)
align with human brain activity during naturalistic interactive tasks.
## Core Insight
Action-specialized fine-tuning reorganizes multimodal representations toward
action-relevant neural computations, even when whole-brain prediction accuracy
is statistically equivalent between models.
## Key Findings (Oota et al., arXiv:2605.19352)
1. **VLMs and LAMs outperform RL baselines** in voxel-wise encoding, even at
matched feature dimensionality
2. **Prompt gains scale with cortical hierarchy**: largest in frontal-parietal
and motor-planning regions; early visual cortex gains ~half as much
3. **VLM is prompt-symmetric**: 12.5% unique action vs 13.6% unique reasoning
variance — balanced representation
4. **LAM is prompt-asymmetric**: 27% unique action vs -5% unique reasoning —
action-specialized, strongest in frontal-motor cortex
5. **Equivalent accuracy ≠ equivalent alignment**: models can match in R² while
having fundamentally different representational organization
## Methodology
### Experimental Design
```
Stimulus: Naturalistic Atari-style video game gameplay
Recording: fMRI during gameplay
Models: VLM (reasoning/action prompts), LAM (reasoning/action prompts), RL baseline
```
### Encoding Model Pipeline
```python
# Extract model features per frame
features_vlm_reason = vlm.extract(game_frames, prompt="reason")
features_vlm_action = vlm.extract(game_frames, prompt="action")
features_lam_reason = lam.extract(game_frames, prompt="reason")
features_lam_action = lam.extract(game_frames, prompt="action")
# Train voxel-wise encoding models (e.g., ridge regression)
for voxel in voxels:
model = Ridge().fit(features, fmr_data[:, voxel])
r2 = model.score(test_features, test_fmr[:, voxel])
```
### Variance Partitioning
```python
# Decompose unique vs shared variance across prompts
from sklearn.linear_model import Ridge
def variance_partition(features_a, features_b, fmr_data):
"""Compute unique and shared variance for two feature sets."""
model_a = Ridge().fit(features_a, fmr_data)
model_b = Ridge().fit(features_b, fmr_data)
model_ab = Ridge().fit(np.hstack([features_a, features_b]), fmr_data)
var_a = model_a.score(features_a, fmr_data)
var_b = model_b.score(features_b, fmr_data)
var_ab = model_ab.score(np.hstack([features_a, features_b]), fmr_data)
unique_a = var_ab - var_b # variance only explained by A
unique_b = var_ab - var_a # variance only explained by B
shared = var_a + var_b - var_ab
return unique_a, unique_b, shared
```
### Cortical Hierarchy Analysis
```
Group voxels by cortical region:
- Early visual (V1-V3)
- Intermediate visual (V4-LOC)
- Frontal-parietal (FPN)
- Motor-planning (premotor, SMA)
Compare prompt gains per region
```
## Practical Applications
- **Model selection for neuro-AI**: Choose VLM for balanced reasoning+action,
LAM for action-specialized tasks
- **Prompt engineering**: Action prompts shift LAM representations toward
frontal-motor cortex patterns
- **Encoding study design**: Include both reasoning and action prompt variants
for comprehensive brain alignment analysis
## Activation
VLM brain alignment, LAM fMRI encoding, vision-language model neuroscience,
action model brain comparison, prompt-symmetric representations,
prompt-asymmetric representations, interactive gameplay fMRI, reasoning action
alignment, cortical hierarchy encoding, Oota 2026, brain alignment reasoning
action.
## Paper
Oota, S.R. et al. "Brain alignment of reasoning and action representations
from vision-language and action models during naturalistic gameplay."
arXiv:2605.19352 [q-bio.NC], 2026.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!