Task-Driven Co-Design (TDCD) methodology for heterogeneous multi-robot systems. Bi-level combinatorial optimization combining MILP and MCTS for robot design, fleet composition, and planning. Use for multi-agent robotics, automated logistics, co-design problems, and hybrid optimization.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill task-driven-codesign-multirobot --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Task Driven Codesign Multirobot?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-task-driven-codesign-multirobot-ai-collection)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: task-driven-codesign-multirobot
description: Task-Driven Co-Design (TDCD) methodology for heterogeneous multi-robot systems. Bi-level combinatorial optimization combining MILP and MCTS for robot design, fleet composition, and planning. Use for multi-agent robotics, automated logistics, co-design problems, and hybrid optimization.
---
# Task-Driven Co-Design of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systems
This skill provides methodology for Task-Driven Co-Design (TDCD) of heterogeneous multi-robot systems, based on the paper "Task-Driven Co-Design of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systems" (arXiv:2604.21894).
## Overview
TDCD formulates multi-robot system design as a **bi-level combinatorial optimization problem**:
- **Outer-loop**: Selects fleet composition (discrete decisions)
- **Inner-loop**: Searches robot designs and computes coordinated multi-agent plans (continuous + discrete decisions)
## Methodology
The framework synergistically couples **Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP)** and **Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)**:
### MILP Component
- Handles continuous robot design variables
- Optimizes trajectory planning
- Manages operational constraints
### MCTS Component
- Explores discrete decision space of fleet composition
- Handles combinatorial explosion of robot type/quantity combinations
- Provides anytime algorithm with convergence guarantees
## Key Contributions
1. **10× speedup** compared to pure MILP baseline
2. **30% higher success rate** compared to pure MCTS
3. Validated on warehouse logistics with ground + aerial robots
## Problem Formulation
### Variables
- **Fleet composition**: Number and types of robots
- **Robot designs**: Physical parameters (size, battery, sensors)
- **Multi-agent plans**: Coordinated trajectories and task assignments
### Constraints
- Task requirements (pick-and-place operations)
- Physical feasibility (collision avoidance, battery life)
- Resource limitations (budget, space)
## Implementation Guide
### Step 1: Define Task Requirements
```python
task_requirements = {
"operations": [...], # List of pick-and-place tasks
"environment": {...}, # Warehouse layout, obstacles
"constraints": {...} # Time windows, resource limits
}
```
### Step 2: Initialize MCTS
```python
from mcts import MCTSNode, UCB1
# Root node: empty fleet
root = MCTSNode(fleet_composition={})
# UCB1 for exploration/exploitation
ucb_score = Q + C * sqrt(log(N_parent) / N)
```
### Step 3: MILP Sub-problem
```python
from pulp import LpProblem, LpVariable, lpSum
# For each candidate fleet composition from MCTS
milp = LpProblem(f"RobotDesign_{fleet_id}", LpMinimize)
# Variables: robot parameters, trajectories
robot_params = LpVariable.dicts("params", [...], lowBound=0)
trajectories = LpVariable.dicts("traj", [...], cat='Binary')
# Objective: minimize total cost / maximize throughput
milp += lpSum([costs[r] * robot_params[r] for r in robots])
# Solve MILP for this fleet composition
solution = milp.solve()
```
### Step 4: Backpropagation
```python
def backpropagate(node, reward):
while node:
node.visits += 1
node.value += reward
node = node.parent
```
## Workflow
```
1. Input: Task requirements, robot specifications
2. Initialize MCTS with empty fleet
3. While computational budget remains:
a. Select: UCB1 to choose promising fleet composition
b. Expand: Add new robot types/quantities
c. Simulate: Solve MILP for trajectory and design
d. Backpropagate: Update MCTS statistics
4. Return: Best (fleet, design, plan) triple
```
## Advantages
| Aspect | Pure MILP | Pure MCTS | TDCD (MILP+MCTS) |
|--------|-----------|-----------|------------------|
| Continuous optimization | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ (MILP) |
| Combinatorial handling | ✗ (slow) | ✓ | ✓ (MCTS) |
| Scalability | Limited | Moderate | High |
| Solution quality | Optimal (if solves) | Approximate | High-quality |
| Speed | Slow | Moderate | Fast (10×) |
## Applications
- **Warehouse logistics**: Ground + aerial robots for inventory management
- **Search and rescue**: Heterogeneous teams (drones + ground vehicles)
- **Manufacturing**: Collaborative robots with different capabilities
- **Agriculture**: Multi-modal farming robots
## Trigger Keywords
- "multi-robot co-design"
- "fleet composition optimization"
- "task-driven design"
- "heterogeneous robot systems"
- "MILP MCTS hybrid optimization"
- "warehouse automation design"
- "robot fleet planning"
## References
- Stralz, M., Alharbi, M., Huang, Y., et al. (2026). "Task-Driven Co-Design of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systems." arXiv:2604.21894.
- Silver, D., et al. (2016). "Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search." Nature.
- Bertsimas, D., & Tsitsiklis, J. (1997). "Introduction to Linear Optimization."
## Tools Used
- **Python**: `pulp` (MILP), `numpy`, `anytree` (MCTS)
- **ROS**: For robot simulation
- **Gazebo**: Physics simulation for validation
## Example Use Case
```
User: "I need to design a warehouse automation system with 1000 pick-and-place
operations per hour. Should I use ground robots, drones, or a mix?"
Agent: Using TDCD framework, I can:
1. Formulate as bi-level optimization
2. Explore fleet compositions with MCTS
3. Optimize designs and trajectories with MILP
4. Compare pure ground, pure aerial, and mixed solutions
Result: Mixed fleet of 15 ground robots + 8 drones provides optimal
throughput at minimum cost.
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!