Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity (STP) stabilizes goal-conditioned dynamics in PFC-inspired reservoir model for multistep goal-directed action planning. Preserves action-relevant goal information under noise with 89.2% success rate vs 49.5% without STP. Activation: short-term synaptic plasticity, goal-conditioned dynamics, reservoir computing, PFC model, goal-directed planning, dynamic connectivity, facilitation-dominant STP.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill stp-stabilizes-goal-conditioned-dynamics --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Stp Stabilizes Goal Conditioned Dynamics?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-stp-stabilizes-goal-conditioned-dynamics-333f614c)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: stp-stabilizes-goal-conditioned-dynamics
description: "Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity (STP) stabilizes goal-conditioned dynamics in PFC-inspired reservoir model for multistep goal-directed action planning. Preserves action-relevant goal information under noise with 89.2% success rate vs 49.5% without STP. Activation: short-term synaptic plasticity, goal-conditioned dynamics, reservoir computing, PFC model, goal-directed planning, dynamic connectivity, facilitation-dominant STP."
category: neuroscience
---
## Context
The prefrontal cortex (PFC) maintains goal information for action planning, but how recurrent circuits preserve it in an action-usable form over behavioral timescales remains unclear. This paper demonstrates that short-term synaptic plasticity (STP) can stabilize goal information as action-usable, goal-conditioned dynamics through dynamic modulation of goal-dependent effective recurrent connectivity.
**Paper**: arXiv:2606.03481 (Submitted 2 Jun 2026)
**Authors**: Jin Nakamura, Yuichi Katori
**Categories**: Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC), Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE)
**Journal**: Submitted to Neural Networks (68 pages, 33 figures, 3 tables)
## Core Methodology
1. **STP-Enhanced Reservoir Model**: Incorporate STP into PFC-inspired reservoir computing model with basal-ganglia-inspired temporal-difference readout learning
2. **Goal-Conditioned Dynamics**: Preserve goal information in action-relevant form during delay periods
3. **Facilitation-Dominant STP**: Use STP time constants in facilitation-dominant range identified by grid search
4. **Effective Connectivity Analysis**: Analyze goal-specific patterning of effective connectivity during delay period
5. **Dynamic Recurrent Modulation**: History-dependent synaptic modulation stabilizes goal representations under noise
## Implementation Steps
1. **Build Reservoir Model**: Create PFC-inspired reservoir computing network with recurrent connections
2. **Add STP Dynamics**: Implement short-term synaptic plasticity with facilitation and depression mechanisms
3. **Temporal-Difference Readout**: Implement basal-ganglia-inspired learning for action value estimation
4. **Goal Representation**: Encode goal identity in reservoir state during delay period
5. **Evaluate Noise Robustness**: Test with state noise comparing models with and without STP
6. **Time-Resolved Decoding**: Analyze when and how goal information remains decodable
7. **Effective Connectivity Mapping**: Measure goal-specific connectivity patterns over time
## Key Results
- **Success Under Noise**: With STP: 91.8% (no noise) → 89.2% (noise); Without STP: 75.8% → 49.5% (paired Cohen's dz=1.31)
- **Goal Decodability**: Goal identity highly decodable during delay even without STP
- **Action-Relevance**: STP preserves goal information as action-relevant goal-conditioned dynamics
- **Dynamic Connectivity**: Delay-period goal-specific patterning increases toward later trial phase with STP
- **Time-Invariant vs Dynamic**: Without STP, effective connectivity is time-invariant; with STP, it's goal-conditioned and task-state-dependent
## Facilitation-Dominant Range
- Grid search identified facilitation-dominant range of STP time constants associated with high success rates
- STP state perturbation controls support online, history-dependent synaptic modulation
- Gain-matched controls argue against simple fixed recurrent-scaling explanation
## Pitfalls
- **STP Parameter Tuning**: STP time constants require grid search for facilitation-dominant range
- **Reservoir Initialization**: 100 independently generated networks needed for statistical significance
- **Delay Duration**: STP benefits most evident during longer delay periods with noise
- **Goal-Task Interaction**: Goal-conditioned patterning depends on both goal and task state
- **Temporal-Difference Learning**: Basal-ganglia-inspired readout requires proper action-value estimation
## Verification
- Compare success rates with vs without STP under noise (target: ~90% vs ~50%)
- Perform time-resolved decoding of goal information across delay period
- Analyze state-space separability between goals
- Measure action-value-difference availability at action opportunities
- Conduct STP-state perturbation and gain-matched controls
- Analyze effective connectivity patterns over time
- Grid search for facilitation-dominant STP time constants
## Activation
- short-term synaptic plasticity
- goal-conditioned dynamics
- reservoir computing
- PFC model
- goal-directed planning
- dynamic connectivity
- facilitation-dominant STP
- effective connectivity
- delay period
- noise robustness
- action-relevant representationIs this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!