Quantum-tunnelling oscillator model as universal dynamical engine for quantum cognition — models optical illusion perception and group decision making as quantum-mechanical agents with context-dependent state transitions, networked into quantum-cognitive neural systems. Activation: quantum cognition, quantum tunnelling oscillators, optical illusion perception, group decision making, quantum-cognitive neural systems, context-dependent transitions, 量子认知振荡器, 量子隧穿, 群体决策
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill quantum-tunnelling-oscillators-cognition --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Quantum Tunnelling Oscillators Cognition?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-quantum-tunnelling-oscillators-cognition)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: quantum-tunnelling-oscillators-cognition
description: "Quantum-tunnelling oscillator model as universal dynamical engine for quantum cognition — models optical illusion perception and group decision making as quantum-mechanical agents with context-dependent state transitions, networked into quantum-cognitive neural systems. Activation: quantum cognition, quantum tunnelling oscillators, optical illusion perception, group decision making, quantum-cognitive neural systems, context-dependent transitions, 量子认知振荡器, 量子隧穿, 群体决策"
metadata:
arxiv_id: "2604.03940"
published: "2026-04-05"
authors: "Ivan S. Maksymov"
---
# Quantum-Tunnelling Oscillators for Cognition
## Description
Universal dynamical engine for quantum cognition theory — models individuals as quantum-mechanical agents whose choices shift through context-dependent transitions rather than classical probabilities. Networked oscillators form quantum-cognitive neural systems reproducing collective and perceptual phenomena.
## Core Concepts
### Quantum-Tunnelling Oscillator (QTO) Model
- Individual agents modeled as quantum oscillators with tunnelling between cognitive states
- State transitions governed by quantum amplitudes, not classical probabilities
- Context-dependence emerges naturally from superposition and interference
### Application Domains
1. **Optical illusion perception**: Bistable perception explained as quantum superposition of interpretations
2. **Group decision making**: Collective behavior from networked QTOs with inter-agent coupling
3. **Counterintuitive processes**: Naturally handles phenomena challenging classical probabilistic models
### Networked Quantum-Cognitive Systems
- Individual QTOs coupled into networks form collective cognitive dynamics
- Reproduces familiar collective phenomena from individual quantum-level dynamics
- Compact, physically grounded framework for thinking, perception, and decision processes
## Usage Patterns
### Pattern 1: Bistable Perception Modeling
For modeling ambiguous stimuli perception:
1. Map each interpretation to a quantum oscillator state
2. Model perceptual switching as quantum tunnelling between states
3. Context effects enter as perturbation Hamiltonians
### Pattern 2: Group Decision Dynamics
For modeling collective decision processes:
1. Each individual = one QTO unit
2. Inter-agent influence = coupling term in Hamiltonian
3. Collective phenomena emerge from network dynamics
4. Context shifts = time-dependent perturbations
## Methodology
1. Define cognitive state space as Hilbert space of oscillator eigenstates
2. Construct Hamiltonian with tunnelling terms between relevant states
3. Add context-dependent perturbation terms
4. Solve time-dependent Schrödinger equation for state evolution
5. Extract observable predictions from measurement probabilities
## Activation Keywords
- quantum tunnelling oscillator cognition
- quantum-cognitive neural system
- optical illusion quantum model
- quantum group decision making
- bistable perception quantum
- context-dependent quantum transitions
- 量子隧穿振荡器认知
- 量子认知神经网络
- 群体决策量子模型
## Pitfalls
- QTO model is a metaphorical/engineering model — not claiming literal quantum effects in biological neurons
- Parameters (tunnelling rates, coupling strengths) must be calibrated empirically
- Classical limit (large decoherence) should recover standard probabilistic models
- Distinguish from GKSL open-system approaches — QTO uses closed-system Hamiltonian dynamics
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!