Controlled benchmark methodology for quantum vs classical generators in medical imaging with matched parameters (arXiv:2606.18970)
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill quantum-gan-benchmark-controlled-evaluation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Quantum Gan Benchmark Controlled Evaluation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-quantum-gan-benchmark-controlled-evaluation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: quantum-gan-benchmark-controlled-evaluation
description: Controlled benchmark methodology for quantum vs classical generators in medical imaging with matched parameters (arXiv:2606.18970)
category: quantum-benchmarking
---
# Controlled Benchmark of Quantum Generative Augmentation
Methodology from arXiv:2606.18970 (June 2026). Rigorous framework for evaluating quantum generative models in medical imaging.
## Core Pattern
Isolate quantum generator contribution through **controlled evaluation**:
- Match parameter budgets between quantum and classical generators (1648 vs 1632 params)
- Multiple random seeds with paired significance testing
- Multiple comparison correction
- Intraset diversity and latent-distribution analyses
- Evaluate across labeled data fractions (5% to 100%)
## Key Findings
- **No augmentation variant** significantly outperforms real-data-only training
- Quantum and classical generators are **statistically indistinguishable**
- Low-data benefit acts as **regularization**, not faithful data expansion
- Synthetic samples are off-distribution and severely mode-collapsed where data is scarce
- Framework released as testbed for rigorous quantum generative evaluation
## Implementation Steps
1. Encode images into KL-regularized latent space
2. Train conditional Wasserstein GAN with gradient penalty
3. Compare quantum vs classical generator with matched parameters
4. Evaluate across data fractions (5%-100%) with 8+ random seeds
5. Apply paired significance testing with multiple-comparison correction
6. Analyze intraset diversity and latent distributions
7. Characterize whether benefits are regularization or faithful expansion
## When to Use
- Evaluating quantum generative models for medical imaging
- Any claim of quantum advantage in generative modeling
- Need for rigorous, controlled benchmarking protocols
- Avoiding false positives from parameter budget mismatches
## References
- arXiv: 2606.18970v2
- Authors: Syed Mujtaba Haider, Silvia Figini
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!