Physics-aware end-to-end deep reinforcement learning methodology for quadcopter control with actuator dynamics modeling.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill physics-aware-quadcopter-drl-control --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Physics Aware Quadcopter Drl Control?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-physics-aware-quadcopter-drl-control)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: physics-aware-quadcopter-drl-control
description: Physics-aware end-to-end deep reinforcement learning methodology for quadcopter control with actuator dynamics modeling.
paper_id: "2607.25985"
---
# Physics-Aware End-to-End Deep Reinforcement Learning for Quadcopter Control
## Overview
This methodology investigates physics-aware, end-to-end deep reinforcement learning for quadcopter control that acts directly on low-level body inputs (total thrust and body torques) and integrates high-fidelity actuator dynamics.
## Key Contributions
- Integrates 12-state rigid-body model with Action2RPM allocation using Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse
- Models first-order actuator dynamics for each motor (time constant T_m = 0.076s) including rotor gyroscopic coupling
- Implements shaped reward balancing goal-reaching and stability using exponential position well, attitude penalties, and quadratic velocity costs
- Provides reproducible benchmark comparing DDPG, TD3, PPO, and SAC algorithms for quadcopter control
## Implementation Guidelines
1. **Environment Setup**: Use high-fidelity Simulink environment with MATLAB Level-2 S-Function for 12-state rigid-body model
2. **Actuator Modeling**:
- Implement Action2RPM allocation based on Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse of coefficient matrix
- Include first-order actuator dynamics with time constant T_m = 0.076s
- Model rotor gyroscopic coupling effects
3. **Reward Shaping**: Combine exponential position well, attitude penalties, and quadratic velocity costs
4. **Algorithm Selection**: TD3 and SAC show superior stability and exploration efficiency; PPO is less sample-efficient
5. **Training Stages**:
- Stage 1: Thrust-only hover control
- Stage 2: Hover with pitch torque and translated goal
## Use Cases
- Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) autonomous control
- Underactuated systems with limited control inputs
- Applications requiring low-level actuator dynamics modeling
- Robotics control with physical constraints
## Activation Keywords
physics-aware DRL, quadcopter control, actuator dynamics, UAV control, end-to-end DRL, rigid-body modeling
## References
- arXiv:2607.25985 [cs.RO]
- Aeronautical and Astronautical Society of the Republic of China Conference, 2025Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!