Skill for AI agent capabilities
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill llm-confidence-bas --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Llm Confidence Bas?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-llm-confidence-bas)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: skill.md---behavioral-alignment-score-(bas)-for-ll
description: Skill for AI agent capabilities
---
# SKILL.md - Behavioral Alignment Score (BAS) for LLM Confidence
## Paper Reference
- **arXiv:** 2604.03216
- **Title:** A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Evaluating Large Language Model Confidence
- **Utility Score:** 0.87
- **Authors:** Sean Wu et al.
- **Date:** April 2026
## Core Insights
### Key Problem
LLMs produce confident but incorrect answers when abstention would be safer.
Standard metrics (ECE, AURC) don't capture decision-level reliability.
### Solution: Behavioral Alignment Score (BAS)
- **Decision-theoretic metric** for abstention-aware decision making
- Derived from explicit answer-or-abstain utility model
- Aggregates realized utility across continuum of risk thresholds
### Key Properties
- Truthful confidence estimates uniquely maximize expected BAS
- Links calibration to decision-optimal behavior
- **Asymmetric penalty:** strongly prioritizes avoiding overconfident errors
- Unlike log loss (symmetric), BAS penalizes overconfidence more
### Findings
- Models with similar ECE/AURC can have very different BAS
- Frontier models remain prone to severe overconfidence
- Simple interventions improve confidence reliability
## Practical Applications
### Confidence Evaluation
```markdown
1. Compute BAS alongside ECE/AURC
2. Identify overconfident failure patterns
3. Apply top-k confidence elicitation
4. Post-hoc calibration improvements
```
### Decision Systems
- When to trust model output
- When to request abstention
- Risk-adjusted confidence thresholds
### Intervention Strategies
- Top-k confidence elicitation
- Post-hoc calibration
- Risk-aware prompting
## Key Takeaways
- BAS better captures decision-useful confidence
- Overconfidence errors are the critical risk
- Larger/accurate models ≠ better BAS
- Standard metrics miss overconfident failures
## Related Work
- Expected Calibration Error (ECE)
- Area Under Rejection Curve (AURC)
- Log loss / proper scoring rules
## Further Reading
- Full paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03216
- PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.03216
- Benchmark across multiple LLMs/tasks
## Description
SKILL.md - Behavioral Alignment Score (BAS) for LLM Confidence
## Activation Keywords
- llm-confidence-bas
- llm-confidence-bas 技能
- llm-confidence-bas skill
## Tools Used
- `read` - Read documentation and references
- `web_search` - Search for related information
- `web_fetch` - Fetch paper or documentation
## Instructions for Agents
Follow these steps when applying this skill:
### Step 1: Understand the Request
### Step 2: Search for Information
### Step 3: Apply the Framework
### Step 4: Provide Results
### Step 5: Verify Accuracy
## Examples
### Example 1: Basic Application
**User:** I need to apply SKILL.md - Behavioral Alignment Score (BAS) for LLM Confidence to my analysis.
**Agent:** I'll help you apply llm-confidence-bas. First, let me understand your specific use case...
**Context:** Apply the methodology
### Example 2: Advanced Scenario
**User:** Complex analysis scenario
**Agent:** Based on the methodology, I'll guide you through the advanced application...
### Example 2: Advanced Application
**User:** What are the key considerations for llm-confidence-bas?
**Agent:** Let me search for the latest research and best practices...
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!