Evolutionary inductive bias enabling rapid instructed task learning (RITL) in humans - bridges cognitive science, neuroscience, and LLM instruction tuning
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill evolved-instruction-following-inductive-bias --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Evolved Instruction Following Inductive Bias?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-evolved-instruction-following-inductive-bias)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: evolved-instruction-following-inductive-bias
description: Evolutionary inductive bias enabling rapid instructed task learning (RITL) in humans - bridges cognitive science, neuroscience, and LLM instruction tuning
tags: [instruction-following, inductive-bias, RITL, cognitive-flexibility, zero-shot, instruction-tuning, LLM-analogy]
activation: evolved instruction following, inductive bias, RITL, instructed task learning, cognitive flexibility, instruction tuning, zero-shot task performance, cognitive architecture
source: arxiv 2606.29792
date: 2026-06-29
---
# Evolved Instruction-Following Inductive Bias for Rapid Task Learning
## Core Thesis
Humans possess an **evolved instruction-following bias** - an inductive bias shaped by evolution to interpret and execute linguistic instructions, enabling rapid instructed task learning (RITL). This bias functions analogously to how LLMs leverage instruction tuning for zero-shot performance.
## Key Insights
### 1. RITL as Cognitive Flexibility
- Human adults perform novel tasks correctly on first attempt after verbal/written instructions
- Hallmark of cognitive flexibility, yet mechanisms underexplored
- Parallels in artificial systems understudied across disciplines
### 2. Evolutionary Origin
- Instruction-following bias shaped by evolution for survival advantage
- Innate cognitive architecture feature in humans (not learned)
- Enables fast generalization from language to novel behaviors
### 3. LLM Analogy
- Humans: innate instruction-following architecture
- LLMs: instruction tuning during training
- Both achieve zero-shot task performance via different mechanisms
### 4. Cross-Disciplinary Evidence
Synthesizes:
- Cognitive science (task set formation)
- Neuroscience (prefrontal control, language networks)
- Machine learning (instruction tuning, zero-shot generalization)
## Testable Predictions
1. **Neural signatures**: Instruction-following engages specific prefrontal-language network circuits
2. **Developmental trajectory**: Instruction bias emerges early, independent of general intelligence
3. **Comparative studies**: Humans outperform primates on instruction-guided tasks even with equal associative learning
4. **AI design**: Explicit instruction biases improve sample efficiency in neural networks
## Applications
### AI/ML
- Design neural architectures with explicit instruction-following biases
- Improve few-shot learning via architectural priors
- Bridge gap between LLM instruction tuning and human cognitive flexibility
### Neuroscience
- Identify neural correlates of instruction vs. associative learning
- Map prefrontal-language network interactions during RITL
- Study individual differences in instruction-following capacity
### Cognitive Science
- Unify theories of task set formation and language-guided behavior
- Explain rapid cultural transmission of skills
- Model individual differences in cognitive flexibility
## Methodology Recommendations
1. **Behavioral experiments**: Compare instruction-guided vs. learning-by-doing conditions
2. **Neural imaging**: fMRI/EEG during instructed vs. discovered task learning
3. **Computational modeling**: Architectures with explicit instruction bias modules
4. **Cross-species**: Human vs. primate instruction-following comparisons
## Limitations
- Position paper - limited direct experimental validation
- Evolutionary claims require comparative evidence
- Instruction-following may not be a single unified mechanism
- LLM analogy may oversimplify human instruction processing
## Key Questions
- Is instruction-following a domain-general capacity or domain-specific modules?
- How does instruction bias interact with working memory and executive function?
- Can we quantify "instruction-following ability" as a cognitive trait?
- What neural circuits distinguish instruction-guided from associative learning?
## Connections
- Relates to **task set reconfiguration** (Miller & Cohen)
- Connects to **language-of-thought** hypotheses (Fodor)
- Parallels **meta-learning** in ML (learning to learn)
- Links to **cognitive control** and prefrontal function
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!