Evidence-Grounded Verified Agentic Reasoning: A Path Toward Eliminating LLM Hallucination in Empirical Inference via Tool-Attested Kernel Proofs - Tool access alone does not make LLM empirical reasoning governable: accepted outputs need not descend from attested evidence, and accepted deductions ...
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill evidence-grounded-verified-agentic-reasoning-a-pat --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Evidence Grounded Verified Agentic Reasoning A Pat?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-evidence-grounded-verified-agentic-reasoning-a-pat)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: evidence-grounded-verified-agentic-reasoning-a-pat
description: "Evidence-Grounded Verified Agentic Reasoning: A Path Toward Eliminating LLM Hallucination in Empirical Inference via Tool-Attested Kernel Proofs - Tool access alone does not make LLM empirical reasoning governable: accepted outputs need not descend from attested evidence, and accepted deductions ..."
version: 1.0.0
author: Junyu Ren
arxiv_id: 2607.12650
created: 2026-07-14
category: multi-agent-rl
tags: [cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CY, cs.SE]
activation_keywords: [evidence, grounded, verified, agentic, reasoning, path, toward, eliminating, hallucination, empirical]
---
# Evidence-Grounded Verified Agentic Reasoning: A Path Toward Eliminating LLM Hallucination in Empirical Inference via Tool-Attested Kernel Proofs
## Overview
Tool access alone does not make LLM empirical reasoning governable: accepted outputs need not descend from attested evidence, and accepted deductions need not hold up under formal scrutiny. We present EG-VAR (Evidence-Grounded Verified Agentic Reasoning), a Lean 4-based tool-calling architecture in which the Lean kernel is the sole minter of Verified claims via tool-attestation axioms and declared source lifts. Every verified output structurally descends from an attested tool call (Thm. 3.1) and a kernel-checked chain of valid inference (Thm. 3.2); residual outputs are honest Abstain with a replayable audit trail. On a subcollection of TableBench numerical reasoning (n=120), EG-VAR attains 120/120 versus a 95% same-tool baseline; on counterfactual stress tests (5 domains x 2 models), EG-VAR stays 100% source-faithful while same-tool drops to 80-90% (no-tool 50-80%). With the LLM as deployment-time formalizer, residual semantic-formalization error is 3.3% on Sonnet and 1.7% on Opus. We position EG-VAR as a technical-governance interface for high-stakes empirical claims: a formal sidecar makes the target proposition, source scope, evidence boundary, proof obligation, and abstention condition auditable, eliminating unsupported Verified outputs today while turning formalization errors, lift and source-authority disputes, ambiguities, and abstentions into explicit audit targets. Over time, typed sidecars in datasets, APIs, public records, and AI-generated documents can amortize this formalization burden into reusable infrastructure.
## Key Insights
- TODO: Extract key insights from the paper
## Implementation Approach
- TODO: Describe how to implement the techniques from this paper
## Applications
- TODO: List potential applications
## Activation Keywords
evidence, grounded, verified, agentic, reasoning, path, toward, eliminating, hallucination, empirical
---

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!