DART-Q methodology for real-time quantum error correction decoding. Deadline-driven QLDPC decoder framework with queueing theory, EDF scheduling, and admission control for fault-tolerant quantum computing. Activation: real-time decoding, quantum decoder scheduling, QLDPC decoding, deadline-driven quantum, DART-Q.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill dart-q-realtime-qldpc-decoding --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Dart Q Realtime Qldpc Decoding?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-dart-q-realtime-qldpc-decoding-c733ed69)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: dart-q-realtime-qldpc-decoding
description: "DART-Q methodology for real-time quantum error correction decoding. Deadline-driven QLDPC decoder framework with queueing theory, EDF scheduling, and admission control for fault-tolerant quantum computing. Activation: real-time decoding, quantum decoder scheduling, QLDPC decoding, deadline-driven quantum, DART-Q."
category: quantum
---
# DART-Q: Real-Time QLDPC Decoding Framework
## Description
DART-Q is a deadline-driven framework for real-time quantum low-density parity-check (QLDPC) decoding. It treats windowed decode workloads as discrete arrival, queueing, service, and completion events within the fault-tolerant control loop. The framework models each decode request as a deadline-driven online service job with Earliest Deadline First (EDF) scheduling, configurable admission control, and bounded rescue policies.
**arXiv**: 2605.09142v1
**Authors**: Ameya S. Bhave, Navnil Choudhury, Kanad Basu
## Activation Keywords
- real-time decoding
- quantum decoder scheduling
- QLDPC decoding
- deadline-driven quantum
- DART-Q
- quantum error correction timing
- 实时量子解码
- 量子解码调度
## Core Concepts
### 1. Deadline-Driven Online Service Model
Decode requests arrive as discrete events with strict deadlines determined by the quantum error correction cycle time. Each request is characterized by:
- **Arrival time**: When syndrome measurement completes
- **Deadline**: Maximum allowable latency before logical error accumulates
- **Service time**: Decoder computation time for the syndrome
- **Priority**: Determined by remaining time to deadline
### 2. Earliest Deadline First (EDF) Scheduling
Non-preemptive EDF scheduling prioritizes decode requests with the closest deadlines:
```
while decode_queue not empty:
request = select_earliest_deadline(decode_queue)
if can_complete_before_deadline(request):
execute_decode(request)
else:
apply_rescue_policy(request)
```
### 3. Admission Control
Not all decode requests should be processed. Admission control filters requests based on:
- **Current queue depth**: Reject if backlog exceeds threshold
- **Estimated service time**: Reject if decoder is overloaded
- **Priority threshold**: Only accept high-priority (near-deadline) requests under load
### 4. Cached-Summary State Organization
Key finding: A cached-summary state organization lowers the SRAM-fit boundary by 4x relative to an edge-centric baseline. This reduces memory pressure on the decoder hardware.
### 5. Capacity Scaling
Doubling decoder capacity reduces MissRate from 97.64% to 0.98% and improves p99 latency from 3.861ms to 10μs. This demonstrates that service capacity is the dominant factor in real-time decoder viability.
## Implementation Guidelines
### Phase 1: Model the Decode Pipeline
```python
class DecodeRequest:
def __init__(self, syndrome, arrival_time, deadline, priority):
self.syndrome = syndrome
self.arrival_time = arrival_time
self.deadline = deadline
self.priority = priority
self.estimated_service_time = estimate_decode_time(syndrome)
self.status = "pending" # pending, queued, processing, completed, missed
```
### Phase 2: Implement EDF Scheduler
```python
class EDFScheduler:
def __init__(self, decoder_capacity=1):
self.queue = []
self.capacity = decoder_capacity
def add_request(self, request):
if self.admission_check(request):
self.queue.append(request)
self.queue.sort(key=lambda r: r.deadline)
def admission_check(self, request):
# Check if processing this request would cause deadline misses
total_service = sum(r.estimated_service_time for r in self.queue)
remaining_time = request.deadline - current_time()
return total_service + request.estimated_service_time < remaining_time
def select_next(self):
if not self.queue:
return None
return self.queue[0] # Earliest deadline first
```
### Phase 3: Rescue Policies
When a deadline cannot be met, apply bounded rescue:
1. **Skip**: Ignore the syndrome (rely on previous correction)
2. **Approximate**: Run a faster, lower-accuracy decoder
3. **Defer**: Process in next cycle with adjusted priority
## Key Metrics
| Metric | Description | Target |
|--------|-------------|--------|
| **MissRate** | Fraction of decode requests missing deadlines | < 1% |
| **p99 Latency** | 99th percentile decode latency | < 100μs |
| **Throughput** | Decodes per second | Matches syndrome rate |
| **SRAM-fit** | Decoder state fitting on-chip memory | Minimize off-chip access |
## Design Tradeoffs
### Queue Depth vs. Latency
- Relaxing backlog cap increases queued work by ~20.1x and worsens p99 latency by ~17.6x
- Little gain in useful throughput from excessive queuing
### Capacity vs. Cost
- Doubling capacity dramatically reduces miss rate (97.64% → 0.98%)
- This is the most effective optimization lever
### State Organization vs. Memory
- Cached-summary reduces SRAM-fit boundary by 4x
- Edge-centric baseline requires significantly more on-chip memory
## Error Handling
### Decoder Overload
When decoder capacity is insufficient:
1. Apply admission control to filter low-priority requests
2. Use approximate decoder for non-critical syndromes
3. Scale capacity (most effective solution)
### Deadline Misses
When a decode request misses its deadline:
1. Log the miss for analysis
2. Apply rescue policy based on error severity
3. Adjust future admission control thresholds
### Memory Pressure
When on-chip memory is insufficient:
1. Switch to cached-summary state organization
2. Reduce syndrome window size
3. Increase SRAM or use hierarchical memory
## Related Papers
- Price and Payoff (2605.07983): Stochastic resource planning for FTQC
- Lower overhead fault-tolerant building blocks (2605.12385): FTQC building block optimization
## Tools Used
- exec: Run simulation and benchmark scripts
- read: Load syndrome data, benchmark results
- write: Save decoder configurations, performance reports
## References
- Paper: "DART-Q: A Deadline-Driven Framework for Real-Time QLDPC Decoding" (arXiv:2605.09142v1)
- QLDPC codes: Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check codes
- EDF: Earliest Deadline First scheduling algorithm
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!