Shows that extremely coarse feedback signals (distinguishing as few as 8 broad categories) produce neural representations matching or exceeding 1000-class supervised models in brain alignment with primate vision. Trains hundreds of CNNs and ViTs across granularity levels, comparing against macaque electrophysiology and human fMRI. Use when analyzing brain-aligned vision models, role of supervision granularity in neural alignment, or human perceptual similarity learning.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill coarse-feedback-human-aligned-visual --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Coarse Feedback Human Aligned Visual?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-coarse-feedback-human-aligned-visual-6e5b25e7)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: coarse-feedback-human-aligned-visual
description: >-
Shows that extremely coarse feedback signals (distinguishing as few as 8
broad categories) produce neural representations matching or exceeding
1000-class supervised models in brain alignment with primate vision.
Trains hundreds of CNNs and ViTs across granularity levels, comparing
against macaque electrophysiology and human fMRI. Use when analyzing
brain-aligned vision models, role of supervision granularity in neural
alignment, or human perceptual similarity learning.
---
# Coarse Feedback for Human-Aligned Visual Representations
Based on: Mehta & Bonner (2026). *An extremely coarse feedback signal is sufficient for learning human-aligned visual representations*. arXiv:2605.05556 [cs.CV].
## Core Finding
Networks trained to distinguish as few as **8 broad categories** learn representations that match or exceed the neural alignment of models trained on 1,000-class ImageNet classification.
### Most Surprising Result
These coarsely trained networks align more closely with **human perceptual similarity judgments** than ALL other models evaluated, including:
- Networks trained with fine-grained supervision (1,000 classes)
- Self-supervised models (SimCLR, DINO, etc.)
- Leading large-scale vision models (CLIP, DINOv2)
## Methodology
### Stimulus Granularity Manipulation
The paper parametrically varies the granularity of the learning signal:
```
Categories: 2 → 4 → 8 → 16 → 32 → 64 → 1,000
```
Categories are created via **PCA-based splits** of pre-trained embeddings, ensuring natural data-driven groupings.
### Training
- **Architectures**: CNNs (ResNet) and Transformers (ViT)
- **Tasks**: Coarse classification at each granularity level
- **Evaluation**: Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) against:
- Macaque electrophysiology recordings (V1-V4, IT)
- Human fMRI (THINGS dataset, 720 stimuli, 3 subjects)
### Key Results
| Granularity | V1/V2 Alignment | IT Alignment | Perceptual Similarity |
|-------------|----------------|--------------|----------------------|
| 2 classes | Moderate | Low | Good |
| 8 classes | **Best** | Moderate | **Best overall** |
| 64 classes | Good | Good | Good |
| 1,000 classes | Good | **Best** | Worse than 8-class |
| Self-supervised | Good | Moderate | Below 8-class |
## Implications
### For Computational Neuroscience
- **Reframes what learning signals vision requires**: The brain may not need fine-grained category supervision
- **Suggests broad categorical feedback** is sufficient for developing brain-like representations
- **Questions the trend** toward increasingly fine-grained supervision in brain-aligned AI
### For AI
- Opens a path toward building AI systems that are **more aligned with human perception**
- Coarse supervision is **more efficient** (less labeling, simpler tasks)
- Suggests current large-scale vision models may be **over-specified** for human-like visual learning
### For Understanding Biological Vision
- Primate visual systems may learn from relatively **coarse behavioral outcomes**
- The 8-category sweet spot may correspond to evolutionarily relevant category distinctions
- Supports the idea that **broad ecological pressures** shaped visual representations
## Theoretical Explanation
The paper suggests:
- Fine-grained distinctions may introduce **category-specific noise** that distorts representations
- Coarse tasks force the network to learn **genuinely generic visual features**
- Self-supervised objectives optimize for instance discrimination, which may not match human perceptual organization
## When to Use
- **Brain-aligned model design**: Use coarse supervision as a stronger baseline
- **Perceptual similarity research**: Reference for how human-like similarity emerges
- **Computational neuroscience**: Evidence for the role of coarse feedback in visual development
- **Representational alignment studies**: New paradigm for studying supervision granularity
## Citation
```bibtex
@article{mehta2026coarse,
title={An extremely coarse feedback signal is sufficient for learning human-aligned visual representations},
author={Mehta, Yash and Bonner, Michael F},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.05556},
year={2026}
}
```
## Activation
- coarse feedback visual representations
- human-aligned vision networks
- supervision granularity neural alignment
- coarse category learning vision
- brain-aligned representation learning
- minimal supervision brain alignment
- perceptual similarity emergence
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!