Agentic framework for online system operations with Flexible Skill Arrangement. Use when designing LLM-based agents for system O&M, IT operations, DevOps automation, alert management, root cause analysis, or self-evolving agent systems. Activation triggers: system operations, O&M automation, agentic operations, skill arrangement, alert root cause analysis, self-evolving agents, release interception, proactive inspection, KuaiShou operations.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill bian-que-agentic-operations --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Bian Que Agentic Operations?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-bian-que-agentic-operations-d800b87e)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: bian-que-agentic-operations
description: "Agentic framework for online system operations with Flexible Skill Arrangement. Use when designing LLM-based agents for system O&M, IT operations, DevOps automation, alert management, root cause analysis, or self-evolving agent systems. Activation triggers: system operations, O&M automation, agentic operations, skill arrangement, alert root cause analysis, self-evolving agents, release interception, proactive inspection, KuaiShou operations."
---
# Bian Que: Agentic Framework for Online System Operations
> An agentic framework with three contributions for operating large-scale online systems: unified operational paradigm, Flexible Skill Arrangement, and unified self-evolving mechanism. Deployed at KuaiShou with 75% alert reduction, 80% RCA accuracy, 50%+ MTTR reduction.
## Metadata
- **Source**: arXiv:2604.26805
- **Authors**: Bochao Liu, Zhipeng Qian, Yang Zhao, et al.
- **Published**: 2026-04-29
- **Code**: Available at GitHub
## Core Methodology
### Key Innovation 1: Unified Operational Paradigm
Abstract day-to-day O&M into three canonical patterns:
1. **Release Interception** - Monitor deployments, detect anomalies, gate releases before they reach production
2. **Proactive Inspection** - Systematically check system health, predict issues before they manifest
3. **Alert Root Cause Analysis** - Diagnose alert triggers, trace to root cause, recommend remediation
**Why this works**: Instead of treating each O&M task as unique, this taxonomy covers 90%+ of operational events with reusable patterns.
### Key Innovation 2: Flexible Skill Arrangement
Each **Skill** specifies:
- **Which data to retrieve**: metrics, logs, change events, traces
- **Which knowledge to apply**: handbook rules, practitioner experience, historical patterns
- **Context binding**: skills are scoped to specific business-module contexts
**Skill lifecycle**:
1. Skills can be **auto-generated** by LLMs from operational requirements
2. Skills can be **updated** via natural-language instructions from on-call engineers
3. Skills **compose** - multiple skills can be arranged for complex operational scenarios
**Critical insight**: The deployment bottleneck for LLM-based O&M agents is **not reasoning capability but orchestration** - selecting relevant data/knowledge for each event. Feeding all signals causes dilution and hallucination; manual curation is intractable.
### Key Innovation 3: Unified Self-Evolving Mechanism
One correction signal drives two parallel pathways:
1. **Case-Memory-to-Knowledge Distillation**: Historical incident cases are distilled into structured operational knowledge
2. **Targeted Skill Refinement**: Specific skills are refined based on correction signals
**Architecture**:
```
Operational Event → Skill Selection → Data/Knowledge Retrieval → LLM Reasoning → Action
↓
Correction Signal
↓
┌───────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────┐
↓ ↓
Case-Memory-to-Knowledge Targeted Skill Refinement
Distillation Pipeline (update skill definition)
```
## Implementation Guide
### Prerequisites
- LLM with tool-use capabilities
- Access to system metrics, logs, change events
- Knowledge base of operational procedures
### Step-by-Step
1. **Define Operational Taxonomy**
- Catalog all O&M events into the three canonical patterns
- For each pattern, identify common sub-scenarios
2. **Design Skills**
- For each sub-scenario, create a skill specifying:
- Required data sources (metrics, logs, traces, change events)
- Required knowledge sources (runbooks, historical cases, expert rules)
- Output format (diagnosis, remediation plan, escalation decision)
3. **Implement Skill Registry**
- Skills stored as structured objects (JSON/YAML)
- Skills indexed by business-module context and event type
- Support for skill versioning and A/B testing
4. **Build Self-Evolution Loop**
- Capture correction signals (human feedback, automated validation)
- Store incident cases with resolution outcomes
- Periodically distill cases into knowledge updates
- Refine skills based on performance metrics
### Pitfalls
- **Signal dilution**: Feeding all operational data to the LLM causes hallucination. Skills must precisely scope data retrieval.
- **Cold start**: Initial skill generation may require human-in-the-loop. Start with high-value scenarios first.
- **Knowledge staleness**: Skills must be regularly validated against current system state.
- **Over-generalization**: Skills scoped too broadly lose precision; too narrow become unmaintainable.
## Applications
- IT operations automation (AIOps)
- Cloud infrastructure management
- E-commerce platform operations
- Microservice incident management
- DevOps workflow automation
## Related Skills
- agentic-behavioral-modeling
- agentic-fast-slow-planning
- logact-agentic-reliability
- emergent-systems-design
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!