Arxiv 2608 20202 Memtrapbench Benchmarking Cognitive Traps In Llm M

---
name: arxiv-2608-20202-memtrapbench-benchmarking-cognitive-traps-in-llm-m
description: 'MemTrapBench: Benchmarking Cognitive Traps in LLM Memory Use (arXiv: 2608.20202)'
category: neuroscience
version: "1.0"
date: 2026-08-22
---

# MemTrapBench: Benchmarking Cognitive Traps in LLM Memory Use

**Authors:** Mengru Wang, Haozhe Luo, Zhenqian Xu, Zhixiang Cui, Haoming Xu, Qu Yang, Jizhan Fang, Junfeng Fang, Ningyu Zhang
**arXiv:** 2608.20202
**Utility:** 1.00
**Published:** 2026-08-20T16:00:17Z
**Link:** http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20202

## Abstract

Memory has become a key component of large language models, enabling them to retain information and learn from long-term interactions. However, existing memory benchmarks mainly evaluate whether information is correctly extracted, stored, and retrieved, while largely overlooking how retrieved memories reshape model reasoning and affect performance on the current task. We identify memory-induced cognitive traps: even faithfully recorded and semantically relevant memories can distort model reasoning or beliefs and degrade current task performance. To systematically evaluate these failure modes, we introduce MemTrapBench, which covers two forms of cognitive traps: Reasoning Fixation and Belief Distortion. Experiments across two model families and five representative memory frameworks show that MemTrapBench is challenging: all evaluated memory strategies underperform the no-memory setting, with even the strongest methods suffering drops of more than 10%. To mitigate these cognitive traps, we propose AdaptiveMem, a simple yet effective inference-time method that instructs LLMs to avoid memory traps. AdaptiveMem mitigates cognitive traps on MemTrapBench while preserving or improving performance on standard memory benchmarks across diverse memory frameworks.

## Summary

This skill encapsulates the key contributions and methods from the arXiv paper "MemTrapBench: Benchmarking Cognitive Traps in LLM Memory Use". 
The paper presents novel ideas in neuroscience that can be applied to agent systems.

## How to Use

1. Review the paper's methodology and findings.
2. Identify applicable components for your agent workflow.
3. Implement the core techniques as described in the paper.
4. Validate improvements in your specific use case.

## Pitfalls

- Ensure the paper's assumptions match your agent's environment.
- Validate implementation details before deployment.
- Consider computational complexity and resource requirements.

## References

- arXiv:2608.20202