Evidence Before Expansion: Reuse, Spawn, or Defer in Lifelong Expert Pools (arXiv: 2608.19888)
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill arxiv-2608-19888-evidence-before-expansion-reuse-spawn-or-defer-in --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Arxiv 2608 19888 Evidence Before Expansion Reuse Spawn Or Defer In?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/hiyenwong-arxiv-2608-19888-evidence-before-expansion-reuse-s)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: arxiv-2608-19888-evidence-before-expansion-reuse-spawn-or-defer-in
description: 'Evidence Before Expansion: Reuse, Spawn, or Defer in Lifelong Expert Pools (arXiv: 2608.19888)'
category: spiking-neuromorphic
version: "1.0"
date: 2026-08-22
---
# Evidence Before Expansion: Reuse, Spawn, or Defer in Lifelong Expert Pools
**Authors:** Kentaro Oda
**arXiv:** 2608.19888
**Utility:** 1.00
**Published:** 2026-08-20T10:54:17Z
**Link:** http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19888
## Abstract
Streaming systems that maintain a pool of expert models must repeatedly decide whether to reuse an existing expert for arriving data, spawn a new one, or defer. We present a decision layer that makes all three outcomes statistically meaningful. Reuse and spawn are posed as one-sided sequential hypotheses on a conditional (mechanism-level) discrepancy, separated by an indifference zone; defer is exactly the state in which neither betting e-process has accumulated sufficient evidence. We prove finite-time anytime validity for the observable surrogate discrepancy of a predictable discriminator sequence, and an unconditional one-sided transfer to the population quantity in which each side's slack is the excess risk of a single discriminator; an empirically observed downward-bias regularity makes the spawn side exactly conservative. Recency without sacrificing the guarantee is obtained by a restarted e-detector: a bank of unwindowed betting supermartingales at geometrically spaced restart times (O(log t) memory), with the error budget spent over restart instances, which preserves lifetime anytime validity; spending over expert-creation order likewise controls multiplicity for unboundedly many experts. On synthetic multi-concept streams, Electricity, Covertype, and the recurrence-heavy INSECTS benchmark, the instance-accounted restarted bank achieves zero false spawns and zero false reuses after switches and matches or exceeds the retired windowed heuristic (INSECTS-reoccurring accuracy 0.675), making the deployed algorithm and the guaranteed algorithm one and the same.
## Summary
This skill encapsulates the key contributions and methods from the arXiv paper "Evidence Before Expansion: Reuse, Spawn, or Defer in Lifelong Expert Pools".
The paper presents novel ideas in spiking-neuromorphic that can be applied to agent systems.
## How to Use
1. Review the paper's methodology and findings.
2. Identify applicable components for your agent workflow.
3. Implement the core techniques as described in the paper.
4. Validate improvements in your specific use case.
## Pitfalls
- Ensure the paper's assumptions match your agent's environment.
- Validate implementation details before deployment.
- Consider computational complexity and resource requirements.
## References
- arXiv:2608.19888
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!