Resolve an explicit Normalized Repository State contradiction. This is the sole writer allowed to update frozen repository facts or accepted decisions. Triggers: "resolve repository state", "resolve contradiction", "update a frozen repository fact".
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add gtrabanco/agentic-workflow --skill resolve-repository-state --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Resolve Repository State?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gtrabanco-resolve-repository-state)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: resolve-repository-state
user-invocable: true
version: 1.2.1
argument-hint: <contradiction-id>
description: >
Resolve an explicit Normalized Repository State contradiction. This is the
sole writer allowed to update frozen repository facts or accepted decisions.
Triggers: "resolve repository state", "resolve contradiction", "update a
frozen repository fact".
---
# Resolve Repository State
Resolve evidence conflicts explicitly and publish the next frozen snapshot.
## Turn contract
```
✓ A named contradiction and both evidence sources were read
✓ The disposition is accepted, rejected, or needs-input
✓ Accepted/rejected results publish a frozen snapshot; needs-input stops without freezing
✓ No unrelated fact or decision changed
✓ The closing → Next: block is printed last
```
## Step 0 — Discover the project (always first)
Read the agent guide, documentation map, frozen ledger, and the requested
contradiction before deciding anything.
## Process
1. Read the frozen ledger and the contradiction row named by the user.
2. Verify both the frozen fact's evidence and the proposed new evidence.
3. Choose one result: accept new evidence, reject it, or request human input.
4. If human input is required, update the contradiction row with the exact
missing evidence or decision, keep snapshot status `contradicted`, and stop
without incrementing the snapshot identifier or publishing a frozen snapshot.
5. For an accepted result, supersede the fact or decision with a new row that
cites both evidence sources. For a rejected result, retain the fact and
record why.
6. For accepted or rejected results only, update the contradiction row,
increment the snapshot identifier, set status to `frozen`, and record the
next frozen snapshot's source revision.
## Guardrails
- This skill is the sole writer for updates to frozen facts and accepted decisions.
- A consumer may propose a contradiction but never resolve it inline.
- Inference and documentation alone are insufficient to update a fact.
## Portability
Without a slash menu, open this file and follow its process in a fresh turn.
## Relationship to other skills
Consumes contradictions from every workflow role and produces the snapshot that
discovery, planning, execution, review, and audit reuse. The contradiction's
`Reported by` field identifies the interrupted role to resume; resolution never
defaults a review, audit, or status interruption to planning.
## Done when
The contradiction has a recorded disposition, and either the next frozen
snapshot is internally consistent or the missing human input is explicit.
If human input is required:
→ Next: provide the requested evidence or decision — resolution cannot continue yet
· evidence supplied → rerun /resolve-repository-state <contradiction-id>
Otherwise:
→ Next: resume the interrupted workflow named by `Reported by` — continue from the resolved snapshot
· planning was interrupted → /plan-feature <slug>
· implementation was interrupted → /execute-phase <NN>
(only while its `PLAN-REVIEW-PASS` is still current → else /review-plan <NN>)
· review, audit, or status was interrupted → rerun that same skill
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!