To partition large workspaces (100+ files) into scoped subagent tasks when context is insufficient.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add griddynamics/rosetta --skill large-workspace-handling --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Large Workspace Handling?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/griddynamics-large-workspace-handling-4a16862a)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: large-workspace-handling
description: "To partition large workspaces (100+ files) into scoped subagent tasks when context is insufficient."
license: Apache-2.0
tags: ["skill", "workspace", "large-workspace", "delegation"]
baseSchema: docs/schemas/skill.md
---
<large_workspace_handling>
<role>
Workspace partitioning strategist. Draws scope boundaries, dispatches subagents.
</role>
<when_to_use_skill>
Large workspaces exceeding single-agent context window. Partitions into write-scopes where every file belongs to exactly one scope, and merged results address the original request completely.
</when_to_use_skill>
<core_concepts>
- All Rosetta prep steps MUST be FULLY completed, load-project-context skill loaded and fully executed
- If CODEMAP.md missing, RECOMMEND USER TO USE FLOW `init-workspace-flow.md` to initialize repository (CODEMAP.md is missing)
- Grep `#` headers of CODEMAP before scoping
Two strategies (mutually exclusive):
- Summarize & Index
- Work distribution
## Summarization & Indexing
- Research without changing code, navigable index with module summaries, etc.
- Assign subagents: scope paths, goal, context, inputs, output format, boundaries, constraints, and level of detail
- Subagents to USE SKILL `reverse-engineering` if needed for code analysis
- Request slightly more information than actually needed for better understanding
- Summarize all outputs
- Subagent: discoverer, explore, etc.
- Subagent output structure: analysis scope, TLDR answer, quick navigation with relevance, details with subsections per each logical group (globs, purpose, key components, relevant findings, dependencies), cross-group map, follow ups required
- Subagents to use relevance classification:
- High: group directly addresses the research question
- Medium: group has supporting information or context
- Low: group tangentially related, included for completeness
## Work distribution
- Coordinated modifications via contract-scoped parallel subagents with explicit boundaries and success criteria
- Split work across subagents and provide: scope paths, goal, context, inputs, output format, boundaries, constraints, operations, and success criteria
- Subagents decide and execute work within declared scope
- Resolve cross-scope deps via execution ordering
- Resolve shared-interface conflicts or changes with extra pass
- Produce unified result
- Subagent: executor, engineer, etc.
## Task type detection:
- `Summarize & Index` keywords: understand, analyze, investigate, explore, document, explain, find, search, review, audit, learn, overview
- `Work distribution` keywords: implement, create, add, fix, refactor, update, change, modify, delete, remove, migrate, build, write
- Tie-breaker: default to `Summarize & Index`
Scoping:
- Partition into independent areas
- One subagent per area or logical group
- Group coupled paths and related work into one scope
- Align to monorepo boundaries when present
- Define output files in advance using agent feature TEMP folder
- Spawn subagents in parallel if possible to do the work
- Once work is done spawn another set of subagents to verify that the work was done properly
</core_concepts>
</large_workspace_handling>
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!