Write clear GitHub Actions step summaries with progressive disclosure.
Scanned 9/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add githubnext/gh-aw --skill workflow-step-summaries --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Workflow Step Summaries?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/githubnext-workflow-step-summaries)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: workflow-step-summaries
description: Write clear GitHub Actions step summaries with progressive disclosure.
---
# GitHub Actions Step Summary Guidance
Use this skill when generating content for `$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY`.
### Structure summaries for quick scanning
- Start sections at `###` (h3) for readable hierarchy in workflow run pages.
- Keep titles plain text with no emojis.
- Put the most important status and outcomes first.
### Use progressive disclosure
- Wrap detailed diagnostics, logs, and secondary data in HTML `<details>` blocks.
- Use a concise `<summary>` line that states what the collapsed section contains.
- Keep default-expanded content short; move verbose output into collapsible blocks.
### Use Markdown for code and review output
- In `actions/github-script`, prefer `core.summary.*` helpers to build summary content.
- Use inline code with backticks for commands, paths, IDs, and config keys.
- Use fenced code blocks with a language tag for logs, diffs, snippets, or commands.
- Present review findings as markdown sections with clear severity and action items.
### Suggested checklist before writing
- Confirm section headings start at h3.
- Confirm no title includes emoji.
- Confirm verbose content is inside `<details>` blocks.
- Confirm code and review content uses proper markdown code formatting.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Interview, source-challenge, verify, save, and ADR-gate fuzzy coding requests into Codex-ready implementation specs. Use when a feature, bugfix, refactor, migration, repo-wide change, or architecture task needs user-verified requirements, source-backed decisions, durable architecture decisions, acceptance criteria, validation commands, rollout notes, saved spec/ADR files, and a Codex execution prompt. Do not use when already fully specified or when the user wants direct implementation now.
Use when a repo needs CodeGraph plus ast-grep for Codex MCP setup, exploration, impact analysis, structural search, or safe refactor planning.