Reproduce and evaluate refusal-direction ablation on controlled checkpoints. Use when estimating refusal representations, applying activation or weight orthogonalization, measuring behavior change, or comparing ablated artifacts.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add gaelic-ghost/socket --skill ablate-refusal-representations --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ablate Refusal Representations?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gaelic-ghost-ablate-refusal-representations-socket)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ablate-refusal-representations
description: Reproduce and evaluate refusal-direction ablation on controlled checkpoints. Use when estimating refusal representations, applying activation or weight orthogonalization, measuring behavior change, or comparing ablated artifacts.
---
# Ablate Refusal Representations
## Research Boundary
Treat ablation as controlled model-internals research. Use models and evaluation targets the operator is authorized to modify and test. Do not turn a checkpoint experiment into unapproved probing of a third-party production service.
## Workflow
1. Invoke `design-model-experiment`; state the mechanism claim and the behavior claim separately.
2. Pin the base checkpoint and reproduce its baseline refusal, compliance, capability, and safety behavior.
3. Build matched harmful/harmless or refusal/compliance contrast sets with held-out topics and surface-form controls.
4. Estimate candidate directions across declared layers and token positions; retain searched candidates, not only the winner.
5. Test reversible activation ablation before persistent weight orthogonalization when the hypothesis permits it.
6. Compare zero, sign-reversed, random norm-matched, unrelated-concept, and shuffled-label interventions.
7. Measure refusal reduction on the target set plus benign compliance, general capability, calibration, fluency, and hazardous-behavior guardrails. Invoke `evaluate-jailbreak-resilience` whenever the claim includes harmful compliance or safety resilience.
8. Preserve the base checkpoint as immutable, write every weight edit to a new artifact, and record both checksums plus the exact transformation; never overwrite the base weights in place.
9. Evaluate the exact saved artifact after any weight edit, merge, quantization, or conversion.
10. Use `compare-model-checkpoints` and report collateral behavior changes with the headline result.
## Evidence Discipline
Reducing refusal strings is not sufficient: distinguish shallow response-format changes from increased task completion. A direction that generalizes only to the extraction template or searched topics is not a general refusal mechanism.
## References
Read `references/refusal-ablation.md` for the source research and required controls.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!