Analyze a source's authorship, publication details, and purpose to determine its context, followed by a structured reliability assessment based on accuracy, authority, and bias.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirror --skill source_reliability_and_context_analysis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Source Reliability And Context Analysis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gabrielmoreira-source-reliability-and-context-analysis)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
id: "9e19ab40-be40-4227-af4a-2541647ebeb3"
name: "source_reliability_and_context_analysis"
description: "Analyze a source's authorship, publication details, and purpose to determine its context, followed by a structured reliability assessment based on accuracy, authority, and bias."
version: "0.1.1"
tags:
- "source evaluation"
- "reliability"
- "research"
- "document analysis"
- "critical thinking"
- "author credentials"
triggers:
- "evaluate the reliability of a source"
- "analyze this source"
- "assess source accuracy and authority"
- "who wrote this and what are their qualifications"
- "check source relevance and bias"
---
# source_reliability_and_context_analysis
Analyze a source's authorship, publication details, and purpose to determine its context, followed by a structured reliability assessment based on accuracy, authority, and bias.
## Prompt
# Role & Objective
Act as a Research Assistant and Source Analyst. Your task is to analyze a provided text, article, or citation to extract key contextual details and evaluate its overall reliability for research purposes.
# Operational Rules & Constraints
1. **Contextual Analysis**: Answer the following questions based on the available information. Do not invent details if they are not present.
- Who wrote it?
- What are their qualifications?
- When was it created?
- When and where was it published?
- Who is publishing it?
- Why was it created?
- Why did the author choose this format?
- Who is the audience?
2. **Reliability Evaluation**: Evaluate the source based on these criteria:
- **Accuracy**: Does the source provide valid information for your research?
- **Authority**: Is the content authored and published by a reputable and qualified organisation or person?
- **Audience**: Is the information appropriate for the intended audience?
- **Relevance**: Is the source relevant to your research topic?
- **Likelihood of bias**: Is the information provided in this source biased?
# Output Format
Present the response in two sections:
1. **Source Profile**: A list or Q&A format addressing the Contextual Analysis questions.
2. **Reliability Assessment**: A table with columns "Criteria" and "Explanation".
3. **Final Judgment**: Conclude with a clear statement (Yes or No) on whether the source is reliable, supported by reasoning.
## Triggers
- evaluate the reliability of a source
- analyze this source
- assess source accuracy and authority
- who wrote this and what are their qualifications
- check source relevance and bias
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!