Generate a therapeutic indication dossier. Covers the patient population, epidemiology, disease biology, standard of care, regulatory precedent, and landmark clinical trials.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirror --skill indication-dossier --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Indication Dossier?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gabrielmoreira-indication-dossier)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: indication-dossier
description: >
Generate a therapeutic indication dossier. Covers the patient population,
epidemiology, disease biology, standard of care, regulatory precedent, and
landmark clinical trials.
license: Apache-2.0
---
# Indication Dossier
Produces a structured research dossier on a single indication, framed as a
patient population: who they are, what's wrong, how they're treated today,
and how clinical trials can be designed to help them. Runs as five phases
that write resumable waypoint files; after a brief identity check at the end
of Phase 1, the remaining phases run straight through.
## Framing
**Think of an indication as a patient population.** Frame everything
from the patient perspective: "Who are these patients?" not "What is this
disease?"; "How are these patients identified and managed?" not "What causes
this condition?"; population nesting: "all patients in {child} are patients
in {parent}".
Some indications don't map to ICD codes or standard disease definitions:
"immunosenescence" is a biological state, not a billable diagnosis; "ageing"
is not an FDA-accepted indication; "GLP-1 induced sarcopenia" is an
iatrogenic population. Note these distinctions explicitly. They matter for
regulatory path and trial design.
## Inputs
- **`indication`** (required) — indication name (e.g., "sarcopenia",
"idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis").
- **`additional_context`** (optional) — areas to focus on, parent
indication, or other framing.
- **`workdir`** (optional) — where to write waypoints and the final report.
Defaults to `./do_not_commit/indication-dossier-<slug>/`.
## Tools this skill expects
| Purpose | Tool |
|---|---|
| ClinicalTrials.gov | `clinical-trials` MCP |
| Literature | `pubmed` MCP |
| Web | `WebSearch`, `WebFetch` — FDA guidance, treatment guidelines (NCCN, AASLD, specialty societies), CDC/WHO epidemiology data |
| Documents | `WebFetch` for remote PDFs; `Read` for local PDFs |
| Subagents | `Agent` for parallel evidence gathering |
If a listed MCP isn't connected, say so and fall back to `WebSearch` against
the underlying public source (clinicaltrials.gov, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
## Output layout
```
<workdir>/
└── waypoints/
├── progress.json # loop control
├── meta.json # phase 1
├── epidemiology.json # phase 2
├── biology_soc.json # phase 3
├── regulatory_trials.json # phase 4
├── sources_evaluated.json
├── research_output.json # phase 5 — structured output
└── indication_dossier_report.md # phase 5 — the deliverable
```
Schemas for every waypoint file are in `references/waypoint-schemas.md`.
Waypoints are the resumable state. If the workdir already has waypoints, read
them, summarize what's done, and ask which phase to resume from.
## Before starting
Read `references/00-research-standards.md`. It governs sourcing and the
anti-fabrication rules for every phase. Then create `<workdir>/waypoints/`.
## Workflow
The dossier is built in five phases. After each phase, write the waypoint
file and emit a ≤200-word summary of what you found and what's uncertain,
then proceed directly to the next phase. The one exception is Phase 1: after
writing `meta.json`, show the resolved indication identity and call
`ask_user` with options **Proceed** / **Revise identity** / **Stop**, so a
misread indication name can be caught before the expensive phases run. If
`ask_user` is unavailable, state "proceeding on this interpretation;
interrupt now to correct it" and continue.
### Phase 1 — Meta initialization
Read `references/01-meta-initialization.md`. Resolve the indication identity:
clinical definition, ICD codes, aliases, parent indication, and whether it's
a recognized diagnostic entity. Run a quick CT.gov landscape scan. Stand up
`waypoints/meta.json`.
### Phase 2 — Epidemiology research
Read `references/02-epidemiology-research.md`. Characterize the population:
diagnostic criteria, prevalence and incidence, demographics and risk factors,
natural history. Use parallel subagents to search PubMed and the web
simultaneously. Write `waypoints/epidemiology.json`.
### Phase 3 — Biology & standard-of-care research
Read `references/03-biology-soc-research.md`. Establish pathophysiology,
biomarkers, approved therapies, treatment guidelines, and unmet need. Use
parallel subagents: PubMed for biology, web for guidelines, FDA for
approvals. Write `waypoints/biology_soc.json`.
### Phase 4 — Regulatory & trials research
Read `references/04-regulatory-trials-research.md`. Establish FDA/EMA
accepted endpoints, regulatory precedents, typical trial design parameters,
landmark trials, and notable failures. Use parallel subagents: FDA for
guidance/approvals, CT.gov for trial patterns, PubMed for trial-history
reviews. Write `waypoints/regulatory_trials.json`.
### Phase 5 — Synthesis
Read `references/05-synthesis.md` and `references/06-writing-style.md`. Read
all four consolidated waypoint files. Write
`waypoints/indication_dossier_report.md` — narrative sections in the order
the synthesis reference specifies, with inline citations per the style guide
— and `waypoints/research_output.json`. No new research threads in this
phase. Targeted gap-fills are allowed: a single fetch to resolve a specific
missing value in an existing waypoint field (an approval year, an NCT ID, a
figure from a sponsor pipeline page). Anything broader than that, name as a
gap rather than filling it.
## Resuming
If invoked with a `workdir` that already contains waypoints: list which phases
are complete (waypoint file exists and is non-empty), show the meta summary,
and ask the user which phase to run next. Never overwrite an existing waypoint
without confirmation.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!