Validate alignment quality with insert size distribution, proper pairing rates, GC bias, strand balance, and other post-alignment metrics. Use when verifying alignment data quality before variant calling or quantification.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add gabrielmoreira/agent-skills-mirror --skill alignment-validation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Alignment Validation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/gabrielmoreira-alignment-validation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: bio-alignment-validation
description: Validate alignment quality with insert size distribution, proper pairing rates, GC bias, strand balance, and other post-alignment metrics. Use when verifying alignment data quality before variant calling or quantification.
tool_type: mixed
primary_tool: samtools
---
## Version Compatibility
Reference examples tested with: matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, picard 3.1+, pysam 0.22+, samtools 1.19+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- Python: `pip show <package>` then `help(module.function)` to check signatures
- CLI: `<tool> --version` then `<tool> --help` to confirm flags
If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed
package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
# Alignment Validation
Post-alignment quality control to verify alignment quality and identify issues.
**"Check alignment quality"** → Compute post-alignment QC metrics (mapping rate, pairing, insert size, strand balance) to identify issues before downstream analysis.
- CLI: `samtools flagstat`, `samtools stats`, Picard `CollectAlignmentSummaryMetrics`
- Python: `pysam.AlignmentFile` iteration with metric calculations
## Two Different Validations
| Concern | Tools | What it catches |
|---------|-------|-----------------|
| **File integrity** | `samtools quickcheck`, `picard ValidateSamFile` | Truncation, missing EOF, malformed records, wrong CIGAR, MAPQ out of range |
| **Sequence dictionary identity** | `samtools dict` + M5 diff | BAM aligned to wrong reference flavor / different decoy / chr vs no-chr |
| **QC metrics** | `samtools stats`, `flagstat`, `mosdepth`, Picard `CollectMultipleMetrics` / `CollectHsMetrics` / `CollectWgsMetrics` | Are the data biologically reasonable for the assay? |
| **Contamination / sample swap** | `verifybamid2`, `somalier`, Picard `CrosscheckFingerprints` | Cross-sample contamination, tumor-normal swap, mislabeled sample |
A file can pass `quickcheck` and still be malformed in ways that crash GATK three hours into HaplotypeCaller. Conversely, a QC-poor BAM can be structurally valid.
### File Integrity
```bash
# Fast: header + EOF block check (misses mid-file truncation, invalid CIGAR)
samtools quickcheck -v in.bam || echo "QUICKCHECK FAILED"
samtools quickcheck -v *.bam > bad_bams.fofn # one fail-line per bad file
# Slow but thorough: structural validation
picard ValidateSamFile I=in.bam MODE=SUMMARY R=ref.fa
# Production: ignore expected-but-noisy
picard ValidateSamFile I=in.bam MODE=SUMMARY R=ref.fa \
IGNORE=INVALID_MAPPING_QUALITY \
IGNORE=MISMATCH_FLAG_MATE_NEG_STRAND
```
CI-safe one-liner:
```bash
test -s in.bam \
&& samtools quickcheck -v in.bam \
&& [ $(samtools view -c -F 2304 in.bam) -gt 1000 ] \
|| { echo "BAM failed integrity"; exit 1; }
```
### Sequence Dictionary Cross-Validation (M5)
```bash
# Compare per-contig MD5 between BAM and reference
diff \
<(samtools view -H in.bam | grep '^@SQ' | tr '\t' '\n' | grep '^M5:' | sort) \
<(samtools dict ref.fa | grep '^@SQ' | tr '\t' '\n' | grep '^M5:' | sort)
```
If M5s differ, the BAM was aligned to a different sequence than the current reference (even if contig names match). Concrete failure modes: GRCh38 vs GRCh38.p13 vs GRCh38_no_alt (alt contigs differ); UCSC `chr1` vs Ensembl `1` (names differ, M5s match -- pure renaming); soft-masked vs hard-masked (M5 matches, viewers differ). The M5 tag is the only definitive identity check.
### Contamination and Sample Swap
No alignment QC is complete without these in production:
```bash
# Cross-sample contamination
verifybamid2 --SVDPrefix /resources/1000g.b38.vcf.gz.SVD \
--Reference ref.fa --BamFile sample.bam --Output sample.contam
# VerifyBamID2 README flags FREEMIX > 0.03 as concerning; values escalate from there.
# Relatedness, sex check, sample swap detection
somalier extract -d extracted/ -s /resources/sites.GRCh38.vcf.gz \
-f ref.fa sample.bam
somalier relate --infer extracted/*.somalier
# Tumor/normal pairing verification
picard CrosscheckFingerprints I=tumor.bam I=normal.bam \
HAPLOTYPE_MAP=Homo_sapiens_assembly38.haplotype_database.txt
# LOD > 5 = same individual; < -5 = different
```
Sample-swap rates of 0.5-1% in production cohorts are typical. Without `somalier` or `CrosscheckFingerprints`, swaps are detected only when a downstream finding contradicts clinical expectation.
## Insert Size Distribution
**Goal:** Verify that the fragment length distribution matches the library preparation protocol.
**Approach:** Extract template_length from properly paired reads and compare the distribution to expected values for the library type.
### samtools stats
```bash
samtools stats input.bam > stats.txt
grep "^IS" stats.txt | cut -f2,3 > insert_sizes.txt
```
### Picard CollectInsertSizeMetrics
```bash
java -jar picard.jar CollectInsertSizeMetrics \
I=input.bam \
O=insert_metrics.txt \
H=insert_histogram.pdf
```
### Expected Insert Sizes by Library
| Library | Mean insert | Distribution shape | Diagnostic |
|---------|-------------|-------------------|-----------|
| TruSeq DNA PCR-free WGS | 400-500 bp | Roughly Gaussian | Sharp peak; bimodality = degraded sample |
| TruSeq DNA Nano (PCR) WGS | 300-400 bp | Gaussian, narrower | |
| Twist / IDT exome capture | 250-350 bp | Gaussian | |
| TruSeq Stranded mRNA | 200-300 bp | Right-skewed (transcript distribution) | Long tail = poor size selection |
| Ribo-Zero rRNA-depleted | 250-400 bp | Right-skewed | |
| Smart-seq2 / Smart-seq3 | 200-700 bp | Broad | |
| 10x Chromium (3') | n/a -- not informative | n/a | |
| TruSeq ChIP | 200-400 bp | Sharp | |
| ATAC-seq (Buenrostro / Omni-ATAC) | Multimodal | Peaks at ~50, ~180, ~340 bp | **Missing multimodal pattern = bad library**; missing ~180 bp = under-digested |
| Hi-C / Micro-C | Multimodal | Peak at ligation-junction size | |
| cfDNA / ctDNA | 160-180 bp | Multimodal; ~167 bp mononucleosomal + ~340 dinuc | Tumor-derived shorter (~145 bp); shape itself is a biomarker |
| FFPE | 100-250 bp | Right-skewed, broad | |
| aDNA | 30-80 bp | Sharp left-skewed | |
| ONT (native) | 1-30 kb | n/a | |
| PacBio HiFi | 10-25 kb | Sharp peak | |
For ATAC, the multimodal pattern *is* the QC. If the mononucleosomal peak (~180 bp) is absent, Tn5 was over-titrated, under-titrated, or DNA was degraded. Use ATACseqQC `fragSizeDist()` for the standard ATAC fragment-size diagnostic.
### Python Insert Size Analysis
```python
import pysam
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def get_insert_sizes(bam_file, max_reads=100000):
sizes = []
bam = pysam.AlignmentFile(bam_file, 'rb')
for i, read in enumerate(bam.fetch()):
if i >= max_reads:
break
if read.is_proper_pair and not read.is_secondary and read.template_length > 0:
sizes.append(read.template_length)
bam.close()
return sizes
sizes = get_insert_sizes('sample.bam')
print(f'Median insert size: {np.median(sizes):.0f}')
print(f'Mean insert size: {np.mean(sizes):.0f}')
print(f'Std dev: {np.std(sizes):.0f}')
plt.hist(sizes, bins=100, range=(0, 1000))
plt.xlabel('Insert Size')
plt.ylabel('Count')
plt.savefig('insert_size_dist.pdf')
```
## Proper Pairing Rate
Percentage of reads correctly paired.
### samtools flagstat
```bash
samtools flagstat input.bam
samtools flagstat input.bam | grep "properly paired"
```
### Calculate Pairing Rate
```bash
proper=$(samtools view -c -f 2 input.bam)
mapped=$(samtools view -c -F 4 input.bam)
rate=$(echo "scale=4; $proper / $mapped * 100" | bc)
echo "Proper pairing rate: ${rate}%"
```
### Expected Rates
| Metric | Good | Marginal | Poor |
|--------|------|----------|------|
| Proper pair | > 90% | 80-90% | < 80% |
| Mapped | > 95% | 90-95% | < 90% |
| Singletons | < 5% | 5-10% | > 10% |
## GC Bias
GC content correlation with coverage.
### Picard CollectGcBiasMetrics
```bash
java -jar picard.jar CollectGcBiasMetrics \
I=input.bam \
O=gc_bias_metrics.txt \
CHART=gc_bias_chart.pdf \
S=gc_summary.txt \
R=reference.fa
```
### deepTools computeGCBias
```bash
computeGCBias \
-b input.bam \
--effectiveGenomeSize 2913022398 \
-g hg38.2bit \
-o gc_bias.txt \
--biasPlot gc_bias.pdf
```
### Interpret GC Bias
| Issue | Symptom |
|-------|---------|
| Under-representation | Low GC coverage drops |
| Over-representation | High GC coverage elevated |
| PCR bias | Strong correlation |
## Strand Balance
A balanced 0.48-0.52 forward/reverse ratio applies to WGS / WES / generic DNA-seq on autosomes. Expected to deviate for: stranded RNA-seq (deliberately strand-asymmetric -- verify with RSeQC `infer_experiment.py`), bisulfite (CT vs GA), small-RNA / strand-specific RNA-seq, and chrY/chrM regions. Per-chromosome strand imbalance >5% on autosomes is a field-convention rule of thumb (no single primary citation) — it picks up aligner artifacts; on chrX/chrY it suggests sex-mismatch.
### Calculate Strand Ratio
```bash
forward=$(samtools view -c -F 16 input.bam)
reverse=$(samtools view -c -f 16 input.bam)
echo "Forward: $forward"
echo "Reverse: $reverse"
ratio=$(echo "scale=4; $forward / $reverse" | bc)
echo "F/R ratio: $ratio"
```
### Check Strand Bias per Chromosome
```bash
for chr in chr1 chr2 chr3; do
fwd=$(samtools view -c -F 16 input.bam $chr)
rev=$(samtools view -c -f 16 input.bam $chr)
echo "$chr: F=$fwd R=$rev ratio=$(echo "scale=2; $fwd/$rev" | bc)"
done
```
## Mapping Quality Distribution
### Extract MAPQ Distribution
```bash
samtools view input.bam | cut -f5 | sort -n | uniq -c | sort -k2 -n
```
### Calculate Mean MAPQ
```bash
samtools view input.bam | awk '{sum+=$5; count++} END {print "Mean MAPQ:", sum/count}'
```
### MAPQ Distribution Is Bimodal and Aligner-Specific
Mean MAPQ is misleading; distributions are bimodal (0 and aligner-max). For aligner-specific scales and "unique mapping" sentinels, see sam-bam-basics. The fraction of primary mapped reads at MAPQ >= 30 is a more informative summary than the mean.
## Chromosome Coverage Balance
### Calculate Per-Chromosome Coverage
```bash
samtools idxstats input.bam | awk '{print $1, $3/$2}' | head -25
```
### Check for Aneuploidy / Sex Chromosome Imbalance
Median-normalized per-autosome coverage (1.0 = expected diploid; 0.5 = monosomy/sex; 1.5 = trisomy):
```bash
samtools idxstats in.bam | awk '$2>0 && $1!~/^chr[XYM]|^GL|^KI|^chrUn|^chrEBV/ {
cov[$1] = $3 / $2
}
END {
n = asort(cov, sorted)
med = sorted[int(n/2)+1]
for (c in cov) printf "%s\t%.3f\n", c, cov[c]/med
}'
```
For full ancestry / contamination / relatedness checking, use `verifybamid2`, `somalier`, or `peddy` -- they account for population AFs, not just per-contig depth.
## Mismatch Rate
### Picard CollectAlignmentSummaryMetrics
```bash
java -jar picard.jar CollectAlignmentSummaryMetrics \
I=input.bam \
R=reference.fa \
O=alignment_summary.txt
```
### Key Metrics
| Metric | Description | Good Value |
|--------|-------------|------------|
| PCT_PF_READS_ALIGNED | Mapped % | > 95% |
| PF_MISMATCH_RATE | Mismatches | < 1% |
| PF_INDEL_RATE | Indels | < 0.1% |
| STRAND_BALANCE | Strand ratio | ~0.5 |
## Comprehensive Validation Script
**Goal:** Run all key alignment QC checks in a single pass and generate a summary report.
**Approach:** Combine samtools flagstat, stats, idxstats, and strand counts into one script that outputs pass/warn/fail calls.
```bash
#!/bin/bash
BAM=$1
REF=$2
NAME=$(basename $BAM .bam)
OUTDIR=${3:-qc}
mkdir -p $OUTDIR
echo "=== Alignment Validation: $NAME ===" | tee $OUTDIR/report.txt
echo -e "\n--- Flagstat ---" | tee -a $OUTDIR/report.txt
samtools flagstat $BAM | tee -a $OUTDIR/report.txt
echo -e "\n--- Mapping Rate ---" | tee -a $OUTDIR/report.txt
mapped=$(samtools view -c -F 4 $BAM)
total=$(samtools view -c $BAM)
rate=$(echo "scale=2; $mapped / $total * 100" | bc)
echo "Mapping rate: ${rate}%" | tee -a $OUTDIR/report.txt
echo -e "\n--- Proper Pairing ---" | tee -a $OUTDIR/report.txt
proper=$(samtools view -c -f 2 $BAM)
pair_rate=$(echo "scale=2; $proper / $mapped * 100" | bc)
echo "Proper pairing: ${pair_rate}%" | tee -a $OUTDIR/report.txt
echo -e "\n--- Insert Size ---" | tee -a $OUTDIR/report.txt
samtools stats $BAM | grep "insert size average" | tee -a $OUTDIR/report.txt
echo -e "\n--- Strand Balance ---" | tee -a $OUTDIR/report.txt
fwd=$(samtools view -c -F 16 $BAM)
rev=$(samtools view -c -f 16 $BAM)
strand_ratio=$(echo "scale=3; $fwd / $rev" | bc)
echo "Forward: $fwd, Reverse: $rev, Ratio: $strand_ratio" | tee -a $OUTDIR/report.txt
echo -e "\n--- Chromosome Coverage ---" | tee -a $OUTDIR/report.txt
samtools idxstats $BAM | head -25 | tee -a $OUTDIR/report.txt
echo -e "\nReport: $OUTDIR/report.txt"
```
## Python Validation Module
A skeleton; full implementation is in `examples/validate_alignment.py`:
```python
import pysam
class AlignmentValidator:
def __init__(self, bam_file):
self.bam = pysam.AlignmentFile(bam_file, 'rb')
def report(self, sample_size=100000):
# Sample reads, compute mapping rate, proper-pair rate, MAPQ dist, strand balance
# See examples/validate_alignment.py for full implementation
...
```
The first-N-reads sampling pattern is biased toward chr1 (different GC content and complexity than chrM/chrX/chrY/alt contigs). For unbiased per-chromosome statistics, use `samtools view -s 42.01 input.bam` (seed-prefixed fraction `INT.FRAC` is reproducible; bare `0.01` is not) instead of head-of-file iteration.
## Quality Thresholds Summary
| Metric | Good | Warning | Fail |
|--------|------|---------|------|
| Mapping rate | > 95% | 90-95% | < 90% |
| Proper pairing | > 90% | 80-90% | < 80% |
| Duplicate rate (assay-specific) | see bam-statistics decision table | -- | -- |
| Strand balance | 0.48-0.52 | 0.45-0.55 | Outside |
| Mean MAPQ | > 40 | 30-40 | < 30 |
| GC bias | < 1.2x | 1.2-1.5x | > 1.5x (field-convention bands; Picard CollectGcBiasMetrics does not prescribe specific cutoffs) |
## Related Skills
- bam-statistics - Per-assay metric thresholds, depth/coverage tools, mosdepth
- alignment-filtering - Aligner-specific MAPQ thresholds (canonical home)
- duplicate-handling - Library-aware dedup decisions
- sam-bam-basics - MAPQ-by-aligner table
- chip-seq/chipseq-qc - ChIP-specific QC (FRiP, NSC, RSC)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!