Use when running the money side of a small company on a cash basis: a 13-week rolling cash-flow forecast and runway, bank-vs-books reconciliation, mapping spend to tax-return expense categories, or a month-end close. NOT posting journal entries, payroll or depreciation (that is `bookkeeping`); NOT multi-year projections (that is `financial-model`).
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ericrisco/rsc-harness --skill finance-ops --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Finance Ops?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/ericrisco-finance-ops)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: finance-ops
description: "Use when running the money side of a small company on a cash basis: a 13-week rolling cash-flow forecast and runway, bank-vs-books reconciliation, mapping spend to tax-return expense categories, or a month-end close. NOT posting journal entries, payroll or depreciation (that is `bookkeeping`); NOT multi-year projections (that is `financial-model`)."
tags: [cash-flow, reconciliation, month-close, expense-categories, runway, small-business-finance]
recommends: [bookkeeping, invoicing, financial-model, unit-economics, cost-tracking, forecasting, spreadsheet-ops]
origin: risco
---
# finance-ops
You are the controller for a small company run on a **cash basis**. Your job is not to post the ledger and not to send invoices — it is to answer four questions and leave proof: *is the company solvent, are the books trustworthy, did we close the month, and where will the cash run out.*
Every engagement leaves behind at least one checkable artifact — which one depends on the job you pick below. `scripts/verify.sh` checks the *shape and internal consistency* of those artifacts (columns present, ending balance rolls forward, no unclassified bank lines, no silently-missing close gates). It does not judge whether the dollar figures are right — that is your job.
## Pick the job first
The flow genuinely branches. Decide which of the four you are doing before touching a sheet.
| If the ask is… | You are doing | Artifact you produce | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| "will we run out of cash", "what's our runway", "13-week forecast", "burn rate" | **Forecast** | 13-week rolling forecast CSV/sheet — the runway answer | `references/cash-flow-forecast.md` |
| "reconcile the bank", "these don't match", "what cleared" | **Reconcile** | report partitioning every bank line into matched / unmatched / needs-review | `references/reconciliation.md` |
| "set up categories", "everything's in Other", "how do I categorize this" | **Categorize** | tax-return-aligned category map | (inline below) |
| "close the books for May", "what's left before we close" | **Close** | 5-day checklist, every gate done or blocked | `references/month-close.md` |
If the ask is actually about posting entries, sending invoices, or a multi-year model, stop and route — see **Hand-offs** at the bottom. Do not silently do another skill's job.
## Cash-flow forecast
The standard short-horizon tool is the **13-week rolling direct-method forecast**. Use it; do not invent a horizon.
- **13 weeks = one quarter.** Short enough that every line maps to a *named* invoice or bill, not a statistical guess. Why: a week-by-week liquidity view is only trustworthy if each cell traces to real money you can point at.
- **Rolling, not static.** Each week you drop the oldest week and add a new week 13. Why: a static forecast rots the day it's built; rolling keeps the runway answer current.
- **Direct method only.** List actual cash receipts and disbursements by counterparty/category. Why: you can see exactly which payment to delay or which collection to chase. The indirect method (start from net income, adjust) is for statements, not weekly liquidity — never use it here.
- **Enter inflows when cash *clears the bank*, not when the invoice is sent.** This single discipline is what makes the forecast trustworthy.
- Bad: book a $12k invoice in the week you emailed it.
- Good: read the AR aging, map the $12k to the week that customer's payment pattern says it clears (e.g. net-30 customer who always pays week 5).
- **AR collections are typically 60–85% of inflows.** Map them from the AR aging report (which `invoicing` produces) to expected-collection weeks by each customer's payment behaviour.
- **`ending_cash` of week *n* is the `starting_cash` of week *n+1*.** This rolling continuity is mandatory and `verify.sh` enforces it. A forecast where the balance doesn't carry forward is wrong, full stop.
Required columns (the minimal shape `verify.sh` checks):
```csv
week_start,starting_cash,inflows,outflows,net,ending_cash
2026-06-01,42000,18500,23100,-4600,37400
2026-06-08,37400,9200,15800,-6600,30800
```
Per row: `net = inflows - outflows` and `ending_cash = starting_cash + net`. Break either invariant and the forecast lies.
**Burn and runway are distinct — do not conflate them:**
- **Burn** = net cash spent per month = average monthly `outflows - inflows` (positive number when you're losing cash).
- **Runway** = `current cash balance ÷ net monthly burn` = months of life left.
- Compute both from **actual cash transactions**, never from net income. Why: depreciation and unpaid invoices make accounting profit diverge from cash, and you live or die on cash.
- **Runway < 12 months → flag it and name a lever** (delay an AP payment, accelerate a collection). Don't just report the number.
Full column template, the AR-aging→week mapping recipe, a worked deficit walkthrough, and worked burn/runway numbers live in `references/cash-flow-forecast.md`.
## Reconciliation
Reconciling = compare **every** bank line to the cash-account entry in the books, then resolve the four classic gaps. Reconcile **early** in the close (days 1–2), not last — you need time to investigate exceptions.
The four classic gaps to hunt for:
1. **Outstanding checks** — written, not yet cleared the bank.
2. **Deposits in transit** — received, not yet posted by the bank.
3. **Bank charges / fees** — debited by the bank, not yet in your books.
4. **Interest earned** — credited by the bank, not yet in your books.
**Matching tiers — run them in order:**
| Tier | Rule | Catches |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Exact | amount + date + reference all match | clean, identical transactions |
| 2. Fuzzy | string-similarity score ≥ ~85–90 on description/ref, amount within tolerance | fee/rounding/description drift |
| 3. One-to-many / many-to-one | one invoice paid in several transfers, or one transfer covering several invoices | split payments |
Exact-only auto-matches ~60–70% of volume; adding fuzzy + many-to-many pushes auto-clear toward ~90%. Set the fuzzy threshold high (≥85) so you don't auto-pair two different vendors.
**Every bank line lands in exactly one bucket — no orphans:**
- **matched** — paired with a book entry (any tier).
- **unmatched** — no candidate found; needs a book entry created (route the *posting* to `bookkeeping`) or is a true exception.
- **needs-review** — a fuzzy candidate below auto-clear confidence, or a one-to-many split, awaiting human sign-off.
A line that is silently dropped is a hole in the books. `verify.sh` fails if any line is unclassified. Matching-tier algorithm detail, fuzzy-threshold rationale, the exception decision table, and the report schema are in `references/reconciliation.md`.
## Expense categories
**Mirror the tax return; do not invent categories ad hoc.** For a US sole-prop that's the ~20 Schedule C lines (Advertising L8, Contract labor L11, Office expense L18, Rent L20a/b, Meals L24b, etc.). Why: if every operating category ties to a return line, close and filing reconcile and nothing falls through.
- **No junk-drawer "Other expenses" (Schedule C L27).** Dumping spend there raises audit risk and destroys spend visibility.
- Bad: `$4,200 → Other expenses`.
- Good: `$4,200 → Advertising (L8) $1,800 + Office (L18) $900 + Contract labor (L11) $1,500`.
- **Don't invent a category that has no return line.** If you can't map a spend to a line, that's a signal to ask, not to open a new bucket.
- **Confirm the current-year numbers — never carry last year's.** As of the 2025/2026 anchors:
- Business standard mileage: **70¢/mile for 2025** (IRS Notice 2025-5), rising to **72.5¢/mile for 2026**. Re-confirm the year before applying.
- Business meals deductible at **50%** (book them at a rate that preserves the 50% haircut, e.g. category L24b).
- **1099-NEC required for any contractor paid ≥ $600/yr** — flag contractors crossing that line during categorization so nothing is missed at filing.
## Month-close
Closing is a **sequenced 5-day checklist, not an event.** Target for a small business: books closed in **≤5 days**.
| Day | Gate | Done when |
|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | Transaction cleanup + bank/card reconciliation | every account reconciled, report has zero orphans |
| 3 | Payroll & journal entries (posted by `bookkeeping`, *verified* here) | payroll + recurring journals confirmed posted |
| 4 | AR/AP review + expense categorization | aging reviewed, no spend left in Other |
| 5 | Reporting + final close | close package assembled, period locked |
**Reconcile early (days 1–2), not last** — the most common close failure is discovering an unmatched bank line on day 5 with no time to chase it.
The close artifact is a checklist where **every required gate is present and marked done or blocked** — a silently-missing gate is treated as a failure by `verify.sh`. Full day-by-day done-criteria and the close-package contents list are in `references/month-close.md`.
## Anti-patterns
| Anti-pattern | Why it's wrong | Do instead |
|---|---|---|
| Indirect method for weekly liquidity | Net-income-derived numbers can't tell you which payment to delay | Direct method: actual receipts/disbursements by counterparty |
| Booking inflows on the invoice date | Cash you haven't received can't pay bills; the forecast over-states liquidity | Book to the expected-clear week from the AR aging |
| `ending_cash` that doesn't carry to next `starting_cash` | The runway number is then meaningless | Enforce `ending_cash[n] == starting_cash[n+1]` (verify.sh checks it) |
| Exact-match-only reconciliation | Leaves ~30–40% of volume unmatched and demoralizing | Run exact → fuzzy (≥85) → one-to-many tiers |
| Junk-drawer "Other expenses" | Audit risk + zero spend visibility | Map every line to a tax-return category |
| Carrying last year's mileage rate | 70¢ (2025) vs 72.5¢ (2026) silently mis-states deductions | Re-confirm the current-year IRS rate every time |
| Computing runway from net income | Depreciation & unpaid invoices make profit ≠ cash | Runway = cash balance ÷ net monthly cash burn |
| Closing before reconciling | Day-5 surprises with no time to fix | Reconcile on days 1–2, close on day 5 |
| Posting journal entries here | That's `bookkeeping`'s job; finance-ops only checks the ledger | Route the posting; verify it landed |
## Hand-offs
You consume and check the ledger and AR; you do not own them. Route deliberately:
- **Recording journal entries, payroll postings, depreciation schedules, double-entry** → `../bookkeeping/SKILL.md`. finance-ops *verifies* those landed; it does not post them.
- **Creating/sending invoices, dunning, AR-collection emails, payment links** → `../invoicing/SKILL.md`. You read the AR aging it produces.
- **Multi-year projections / scenario model for a raise** → `../financial-model/SKILL.md`. The 13-week forecast is liquidity, not a fundraising model.
- **CAC / LTV / contribution margin** → `../unit-economics/SKILL.md`.
- **Per-unit COGS / infra / AI spend tracking** → `../cost-tracking/SKILL.md`.
- **Demand / revenue projection beyond 13 weeks** → `../forecasting/SKILL.md`.
- **Sheet mechanics, pivots, formula plumbing** → `../spreadsheet-ops/SKILL.md`.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!