Skip to content
Back to skills

Incident Response

ASecurity

Incident response — severity, communication, mitigation, post-mortem.

  • 6 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 6, 2026
ai-agentsgoperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 6, 2026

npx -y skills add Dev-Toolbelt/dev-team-agents --skill incident-response --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Incident Response?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Incident Response
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/dev-toolbelt-incident-response/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/dev-toolbelt-incident-response)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: incident-response
description: Incident response — severity, communication, mitigation, post-mortem.
---

## Severity Levels

| Severity | Definition | Response Time | Example |
|----------|-----------|---------------|---------|
| SEV1 | Complete outage — service unavailable for all users | Immediate | Site down, payments failing 100% |
| SEV2 | Major feature down — core functionality broken for most users | 15 min | Login broken, checkout not processing |
| SEV3 | Degraded performance — feature impaired or slow for a subset of users | 1 hour | Search slow, notifications delayed |
| SEV4 | Minor issue — cosmetic bug or edge-case failure with low impact | Next business day | UI glitch, rare error for <1% users |

---

## First 5 Minutes

1. **Declare the incident** — state the severity, impacted surface, and known symptoms
2. **Assign Incident Commander (IC)** — one person owns communication and coordination; others investigate
3. **Open an incident channel** — create a dedicated Slack/chat channel (e.g., `#inc-2026-05-10-checkout`)
4. **Send initial status** — post to status page and stakeholder channel within 5 minutes:

```
[SEV1 INCIDENT] - <short description>
Impact: <who is affected>
Status: Investigating
IC: @<name>
Next update: <time>
```

---

## Investigation Loop

Repeat until service is restored:

```
Symptom → Hypothesis → Test → Mitigation → Verify
```

- **Symptom**: what the monitoring/alert is showing (error rate, latency spike, etc.)
- **Hypothesis**: most likely cause based on recent deploys, traffic patterns, or known issues
- **Test**: check logs, metrics, traces to confirm or rule out the hypothesis
- **Mitigation**: apply the smallest change that restores service (rollback, feature flag, traffic shift)
- **Verify**: confirm metrics return to baseline before closing the loop

---

## Communication Cadence

| Severity | Update Frequency | Channels |
|----------|-----------------|----------|
| SEV1 | Every 15 min | Status page + stakeholder channel + incident channel |
| SEV2 | Every 30 min | Status page + stakeholder channel |
| SEV3 | Hourly | Incident channel |
| SEV4 | On resolution | Ticket comment |

Update format:
```
[UPDATE - HH:MM] Impact: <current state> | Action: <what's being done> | ETA: <if known>
```

---

## Mitigation-First Rule

- **Restore service before finding root cause** — rollback, disable the flag, reroute traffic, scale up
- Document all actions taken with timestamps in the incident channel
- Root cause analysis happens during post-mortem, not during active incident
- A working workaround is a valid mitigation; clean fixes come later

---

## Post-Mortem

- Write within **48 hours** of resolution while memory is fresh
- **Blameless**: the goal is to understand system failures, not assign fault to individuals
- Required for all SEV1 and SEV2 incidents; optional but encouraged for SEV3

### Post-Mortem Template

```markdown
## Summary
One-paragraph description of the incident and its impact.

## Timeline
- HH:MM — event / action taken
- HH:MM — event / action taken

## Root Cause
What was the direct technical cause?

## Contributing Factors
- Infrastructure / config state that made this possible
- Process gaps that delayed detection or response
- Dependencies that were involved

## Action Items
| Action | Owner | Due Date |
|--------|-------|----------|
| Fix X  | @name | YYYY-MM-DD |

## What Went Well
- Detection was fast
- Rollback procedure worked as expected
```

---

## On-Call Handoff

When handing off an active incident to the next on-call:

- Update the incident doc with current status and open questions
- Write a short **Current State** summary: what is known, what is still broken, what has been ruled out
- List everything that has been tried and whether it helped
- Tag the incoming on-call in the incident channel and confirm they have access to all relevant dashboards

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.