**Test prompts across Claude, GPT, and Gemini with detailed performance metrics.** Compare 10 AI models with latency, cost, quality, and consistency measurements. ---
Scanned 9/7/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Demerzels-lab/elsamultiskillagent --skill prompt-performance-tester --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Prompt Performance Tester?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/demerzels-lab-prompt-performance-tester)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
# Prompt Performance Tester
**Test prompts across Claude, GPT, and Gemini with detailed performance metrics.**
Compare 10 AI models with latency, cost, quality, and consistency measurements.
---
## 🚀 Why This Skill?
### Problem Statement
Comparing LLM models across providers requires manual testing:
- No systematic way to measure performance across models
- Cost differences are significant but not easily comparable
- Quality varies by use case and provider
- Manual API testing is time-consuming
### The Solution
Test prompts across Claude, GPT, and Gemini simultaneously. Get performance metrics and recommendations based on latency, cost, and quality.
### Example Cost Comparison
For 10,000 requests/day with average 28 input + 115 output tokens:
- Claude Opus 4.5: ~$30.15/day ($903/month)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: ~$0.05/day ($1.50/month)
- Monthly cost difference: $901.50
---
## ✨ What You Get
### Multi-Provider Testing
Test prompts across **3 major AI providers** simultaneously:
- **Anthropic Claude** - Industry-leading reasoning and safety
- **OpenAI GPT** - Most popular, widely-deployed models
- **Google Gemini** - Best cost/performance ratio
### 10 Models Supported (Latest 2026)
**🔵 Claude 4.5 Series (Anthropic)**
- `claude-haiku-4-5-20251001` - Lightning-fast, near-frontier performance ($1.00/$5.00 per 1M tokens)
- `claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929` - Best for complex agents & coding ($3.00/$15.00 per 1M tokens)
- `claude-opus-4-5-20251101` - Most intelligent, state-of-the-art ($5.00/$25.00 per 1M tokens)
**🟢 GPT-5.2 Series (OpenAI)**
- `gpt-5.2-instant` - Low latency for daily tasks ($1.75/$14.00 per 1M tokens)
- `gpt-5.2-thinking` - Deep reasoning for complex problems ($1.75/$14.00 per 1M tokens)
- `gpt-5.2-pro` - Maximum intelligence for research ($1.75/$14.00 per 1M tokens)
**🔴 Gemini Latest (Google)**
- `gemini-3-pro` - Newest flagship model ($2.00/$12.00 per 1M tokens)
- `gemini-2.5-pro` - Exceptional value for quality ($1.25/$10.00 per 1M tokens)
- `gemini-2.5-flash` - Fast & efficient ($0.30/$2.50 per 1M tokens)
- `gemini-2.5-flash-lite` - Most affordable ($0.10/$0.40 per 1M tokens)
### Performance Metrics
Every test measures:
- ⚡ **Latency** - Response time in milliseconds
- 💰 **Cost** - Exact API cost per request (input + output tokens)
- 🎯 **Quality** - AI-evaluated response quality score (0-100)
- 📊 **Token Usage** - Input and output token counts
- 🔄 **Consistency** - Variance across multiple test runs
- ❌ **Error Tracking** - API failures, timeouts, rate limits
### Smart Recommendations
Get instant answers to:
- Which model is **fastest** for your prompt?
- Which is most **cost-effective**?
- Which produces **best quality** responses?
- How much can you **save** by switching providers?
---
## 📊 Real-World Example
```
PROMPT: "Write a professional customer service response about a delayed shipment"
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ GEMINI 2.5 FLASH-LITE (Google) 💰 MOST AFFORDABLE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Latency: 523ms │
│ Cost: $0.000025 │
│ Quality: 65/100 │
│ Tokens: 28 in / 87 out │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ GEMINI 2.5 FLASH (Google) ⚡ FAST & AFFORDABLE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Latency: 612ms │
│ Cost: $0.000078 │
│ Quality: 72/100 │
│ Tokens: 28 in / 95 out │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CLAUDE HAIKU 4.5 (Anthropic) 🚀 BALANCED PERFORMER │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Latency: 891ms │
│ Cost: $0.000145 │
│ Quality: 78/100 │
│ Tokens: 28 in / 102 out │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ GPT-5.2 INSTANT (OpenAI) 💡 EXCELLENT QUALITY │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Latency: 645ms │
│ Cost: $0.000402 │
│ Quality: 88/100 │
│ Tokens: 28 in / 98 out │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CLAUDE OPUS 4.5 (Anthropic) 🏆 HIGHEST QUALITY │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Latency: 1,234ms │
│ Cost: $0.001875 │
│ Quality: 94/100 │
│ Tokens: 28 in / 125 out │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
🎯 RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Most cost-effective: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.00004/request) - 99.98% cheaper than Opus
2. Best value: Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.000289/request) - 90% cheaper, 77% quality match
3. Best quality: Claude Opus 4.5 (94/100) - state-of-the-art reasoning & analysis
4. Smart pick: Claude Haiku 4.5 ($0.000578/request) - 81% cheaper, 83% quality match
5. Speed + Quality: GPT-5.2 Instant ($0.000402/request) - 87% cheaper, 94% quality
💡 Potential monthly savings (10,000 requests/day, 28 input + 115 output tokens avg):
- Using Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Opus: $903/month saved ($1.44 vs $904.50)
- Using Claude Haiku vs Opus: $731/month saved ($173.40 vs $904.50)
- Using Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Opus: $818/month saved ($86.52 vs $904.50)
```
---
## Use Cases
### Production Deployment
- Evaluate models before production selection
- Compare cost vs quality tradeoffs
- Benchmark API latency across providers
### Prompt Development
- Test prompt variations across models
- Measure quality scores consistently
- Compare performance metrics
### Cost Analysis
- Analyze LLM API spending by model
- Compare provider pricing structures
- Identify cost-efficient alternatives
### Performance Testing
- Measure latency and response times
- Test consistency across multiple runs
- Evaluate quality scores
---
## 🚀 Quick Start
### 1. Subscribe to Skill
Click "Subscribe" on ClawhHub to get access
### 2. Set API Keys
Add your provider API keys as environment variables:
```bash
# Required for Claude models
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="sk-ant-..."
# Optional for GPT models
export OPENAI_API_KEY="sk-..."
# Optional for Gemini models
export GOOGLE_API_KEY="AI..."
```
Get API keys from:
- Anthropic: https://console.anthropic.com
- OpenAI: https://platform.openai.com/api-keys
- Google: https://makersuite.google.com/app/apikey
### 3. Run Your First Test
**Option A: Python Code**
```python
from prompt_performance_tester import PromptPerformanceTester
# Initialize tester
tester = PromptPerformanceTester(
anthropic_key=os.getenv("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"),
openai_key=os.getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY"), # Optional
google_key=os.getenv("GOOGLE_API_KEY") # Optional
)
# Test across multiple providers
results = tester.test_prompt(
prompt_text="Write a professional email apologizing for a delayed shipment",
models=[
"claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",
"gpt-5.2-instant",
"gemini-2.5-flash"
],
num_runs=3, # Run 3 times for consistency testing
max_tokens=500
)
# Get smart recommendations
print(f"🏆 Best quality: {results.best_model}")
print(f"💰 Cheapest: {results.cheapest_model}")
print(f"⚡ Fastest: {results.fastest_model}")
print(f"💡 Recommended: {results.recommended_model}")
# Export detailed report
results.export_csv("prompt_test_results.csv")
```
**Option B: CLI**
```bash
# Test single prompt across all providers
prompt-tester test "Your prompt here" --models all
# Compare specific models
prompt-tester test "Your prompt here" \
--models claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 gpt-5.2-instant gemini-2.5-flash \
--runs 5
# Export results
prompt-tester test "Your prompt here" --export results.json
```
---
## 🔒 Security & Privacy
### API Key Safety
- ✅ Keys stored securely in environment variables
- ✅ Never logged, stored, or transmitted to our servers
- ✅ HTTPS encryption for all API communication
- ✅ Zero-knowledge architecture
### Data Privacy
- ✅ Your prompts are NEVER used for training
- ✅ Results only visible to you (or your team on Enterprise)
- ✅ GDPR compliant data handling
- ✅ SOC 2 Type II certified (Enterprise tier)
- ✅ Delete your data anytime
### IP Protection
- ✅ Proprietary quality scoring algorithm
- ✅ License validation on each execution
- ✅ Usage monitoring to prevent abuse
- ✅ Commercial license with legal enforcement
---
## 📚 Technical Details
### System Requirements
- **Python**: 3.8+
- **Dependencies**: `anthropic`, `openai`, `google-generativeai` (auto-installed)
- **Platform**: macOS, Linux, Windows
- **RAM**: 512MB minimum
### Performance
- **Average test time**: 15-45 seconds (depending on models selected)
- **Success rate**: 98.2%
- **Uptime**: 99.9%
- **API rate limit**: 1,000 requests/hour
### Data Retention
- **Starter tier**: 30 days
- **Professional**: 90 days
- **Enterprise**: Unlimited (or per agreement)
- All tiers: Export and delete data anytime
### Metrics Collected
Every test captures:
- **Latency**: Time to first token + total response time (ms)
- **Cost**: Input cost + output cost based on real-time pricing (USD)
- **Quality**: AI-evaluated coherence, accuracy, relevance (0-100)
- **Tokens**: Exact input/output token counts per provider
- **Consistency**: Standard deviation across multiple runs
- **Errors**: Timeouts, rate limits, API failures
---
## ❓ Frequently Asked Questions
**Q: Do I need API keys for all 3 providers?**
A: No. You only need keys for the providers you want to test. For example, if you only want to test Claude models, you only need an Anthropic API key.
**Q: Who pays for the API costs?**
A: You do. You provide your own API keys and pay providers directly (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google) for API usage. The skill subscription ($29-$99/mo) is just for access to our testing platform.
**Q: How accurate are the cost calculations?**
A: We use real-time pricing from each provider's official rate cards. Costs are accurate to the cent based on actual token usage.
**Q: Can I test prompts in non-English languages?**
A: Yes! All 10 models support multiple languages. The skill works with any language.
**Q: What if my prompt is very long (10K+ tokens)?**
A: No problem. The skill handles prompts up to 100K tokens. Just set the `max_tokens` parameter appropriately.
**Q: Can I test custom or fine-tuned models?**
A: Yes, on the Enterprise tier. Contact us to add support for your custom models.
**Q: How does the quality scoring work?**
A: We use a proprietary AI evaluation algorithm that scores responses on coherence, accuracy, relevance, and instruction-following (0-100 scale).
**Q: Can I use this in production/CI/CD?**
A: Yes! Professional and Enterprise tiers include API access. Integrate testing into your deployment pipeline.
**Q: Is there a free trial?**
A: Yes. The Starter tier is free forever (5 tests/month, 2 models). No credit card required.
**Q: What if I exceed my plan limits?**
A: On Starter tier, you'll need to upgrade. On paid tiers, you can purchase additional usage or upgrade to Enterprise for unlimited.
**Q: Do you store my proprietary prompts?**
A: No. Prompts are processed in-memory and immediately discarded unless you explicitly export results.
---
## 🗺️ Roadmap
### ✅ Current Release (v1.2.0)
- Multi-provider support (Claude 4.5, GPT-5.2, Gemini 2.5/3.0)
- 10 models across 3 providers
- Cross-provider cost comparison
- Quality scoring algorithm
- Consistency testing
- Latest pricing data
- GPT-5.2 models support
- Gemini 3 Pro support
### 🚧 Coming Soon (v1.3)
- **More models**: Llama 3.2, Mistral Large, Claude 5 (when available)
- **Advanced analytics**: Prompt optimization suggestions powered by Claude
- **Batch testing**: Test 100+ prompts simultaneously
- **Team dashboards**: Shared workspace with permissions
- **Webhook integrations**: Slack, Discord, email notifications
- **Historical tracking**: Track model performance over time
### 🔮 Future (v1.3+)
- **A/B testing framework**: Scientific prompt experimentation
- **Fine-tuning insights**: Which models to fine-tune for your use case
- **Custom benchmarks**: Create your own evaluation criteria
- **Auto-optimization**: AI-powered prompt improvement suggestions
- **Deployment integrations**: Vercel, AWS Lambda, CloudFlare Workers
---
## 📞 Support
### Documentation
- 📚 **Full Documentation**: https://docs.unisai.vercel.app/tester
- 🔧 **API Reference**: https://docs.unisai.vercel.app/tester/api
- 💡 **Tutorials**: https://docs.unisai.vercel.app/tester/tutorials
### Community
- 💬 **Slack Community**: https://slack.unisai.vercel.app
- 📧 **Email Support**: support@unisai.vercel.app
- 🐛 **Bug Reports**: support@unisai.vercel.app
- ⭐ **Feature Requests**: https://slack.unisai.vercel.app
### Contact
- Email: support@unisai.vercel.app
- Slack: https://slack.unisai.vercel.app
---
## 📄 License & Terms
This skill is **proprietary software** licensed under a commercial agreement.
### ✅ You CAN:
- Use for your own business and projects
- Test prompts for internal applications
- Share results with your team (Professional+ tiers)
- Use in production applications
- Export and analyze test data
### ❌ You CANNOT:
- Share license keys with others
- Reverse engineer the skill
- Redistribute or resell the skill
- Modify the source code without permission
- Use Starter tier for commercial purposes
**Full Terms**: See [LICENSE.md](LICENSE.md)
---
## 🚀 Get Started
1. Subscribe to this skill on ClawhHub
2. Set your API keys (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google)
3. Run tests with your prompts
4. Review performance metrics and recommendations
---
## 🏷️ Tags
**Primary**: ai-testing, multi-provider, prompt-optimization, cost-analysis, llm-benchmarking
**Providers**: claude, gpt, gemini, anthropic, openai, google
**Features**: api-comparison, performance-testing, multi-model, prompt-engineering, quality-assurance
---
## 📝 Changelog
### [1.2.0] - 2026-02-01
#### 🚀 Latest Models Update
- **GPT-5.2 Series** - Added Instant, Thinking, and Pro variants
- **Gemini 3.0 Pro** - Newest flagship model from Google
- **Gemini 2.5 Series** - Updated to 2.5 Pro, Flash, and Flash-Lite
- **Claude 4.5 Pricing** - Updated Haiku to $1/$5 per 1M tokens
- **10 Total Models** - Expanded from 9 to 10 models across 3 providers
#### 📊 Pricing Updates
- All model pricing updated to 2026 rates
- GPT-5.2: $1.75/$14.00 per 1M tokens
- Gemini 3 Pro: $2.00/$12.00 per 1M tokens
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: $0.10/$0.40 per 1M tokens (most affordable)
#### 🔧 Technical Improvements
- Support for latest API versions
- Improved cost calculations with 2026 pricing
- Enhanced model routing for new GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3.0
---
### [1.1.0] - 2026-01-15
#### ✨ Major Features
- **Multi-Provider Support** - Test prompts across Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google
- **10 Models Supported** - Claude 4.5 (3), GPT-5.2 (3), Gemini 2.5/3.0 (4)
- **Cross-Provider Comparison** - Direct cost and performance analysis across providers
- **Provider-Specific Optimizations** - Tailored API calls for each service
- **Enhanced Recommendations** - Multi-provider insights and cost savings analysis
#### 🎨 Branding Updates
- Rebranded from Prompt Migrator to UniAI
- Updated all URLs to unisai.vercel.app
- Updated company name and contact information
- Maintained full IP protection and licensing
#### 🏷️ Expanded Tag Coverage
- Added multi-provider, claude, gpt, gemini, api-comparison tags
- Comprehensive tag set for platform indexing
#### 🔧 Technical Improvements
- OpenAI SDK integration for GPT models
- Google Generative AI integration for Gemini models
- Provider detection and routing logic
- Improved token counting per provider
- Better error handling across providers
- Enhanced quality scoring algorithm
#### 📊 Cost Analysis Enhancements
- Real-time pricing for all 10 models
- Provider-specific cost calculations
- Comparison metrics across providers
- ROI calculations showing potential savings
- Cross-provider cost optimization recommendations
#### 🔒 Security & IP Protection
- IP watermark: `PROPRIETARY_SKILL_VEDANT_2024_MULTI_PROVIDER`
- Zero API key exposure (environment variables only)
- Maintained proprietary code protection
- Full license enforcement across all providers
---
### [1.0.0] - 2024-02-02
#### Initial Release
- Claude-only prompt testing (Haiku, Sonnet, Opus)
- Performance metrics collection (latency, cost, quality)
- Consistency testing across multiple runs
- Basic recommendations engine
- API access for automation
- Proprietary IP protection framework
---
**Last Updated**: February 2026
**Current Version**: 1.2.0
**Status**: Active & Maintained
© 2026 UniAI. All rights reserved.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!