Prepare a sourced, read-only brief for a person or account call
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add davekilleen/Dex --skill call-prep --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Call Prep?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/davekilleen-call-prep-1ca47864)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: call-prep
description: Prepare a sourced, read-only brief for a person or account call
role_groups: [sales, customer_success]
jtbd: |
You have a call coming up and need current context, commitments, and useful
questions without invented objectives, objections, or commercial claims.
time_investment: "3-5 minutes per call"
---
<!-- Generated from `.claude/skills/_available/sales/call-prep/SKILL.md` by `scripts/generate-agents-skills.py`. Do not edit. -->
## Purpose
Build a concise call brief from dated person, account, deal, task, and interaction
evidence. Keep sourced context separate from suggested questions and unknowns.
## Usage
- `/call-prep [person]`
- `/call-prep [company]`
## Evidence, authority, and recovery
Set the call brief's `as-of` timestamp, timezone, participant, and call time. Make
freshness relative to that as-of time. For each interaction, commitment, signal,
account field, objective, and objection, record its source path or record ID and event
date. File modified time is not an event date.
- Treat an unknown objective and unknown objection as unknown. Write
`Unknown — ask`; do not infer intent, buying stage, sentiment, priority, or likely
objection from role, company, silence, or a generic sales pattern.
- Separate sourced facts, the user's stated goals, hypotheses, and suggested questions.
A useful question is not evidence that its premise is true.
- Show contradictory sources and dates side by side. Do not silently choose one.
- Never invent facts, quotes, commitments, dates, outcomes, customer counts, product
capabilities, prices, ROI, payback, rollout time, or integration claims.
- Keep call prep read-only by default. A recommendation is not permission to update a
person, account, deal, or task.
- Preview any requested change, require explicit confirmation from the authorized
human, then read back the saved record. If a write or read-back fails, report
possible partial state and stop before retrying.
## Method
### 1. Resolve identity and call scope
Confirm the exact person/account and disambiguate duplicate names. Confirm:
- scheduled call time and timezone;
- participants and their sourced roles;
- call type only if supplied or recorded;
- the user's objective, if stated;
- the review window for prior interactions;
- authoritative sources for person, account, deal, and commitments.
If identity remains ambiguous, return the candidates and ask; do not merge records.
### 2. Build a source ledger
Collect only the context needed for this call:
| Item | Evidence rule |
|---|---|
| Person role | dated person/account source |
| Relationship | exact observations; no personality inference |
| Recent interactions | canonical event date and source |
| Commitments | exact owner, due date, status, source |
| Deal/account state | authoritative record and source date |
| Pain or request | quote-safe summary tied to an interaction |
| Product/commercial claim | current authoritative product or commercial source |
Deduplicate repeated meeting or CRM records by stable ID. Preserve materially
different accounts and contradictions.
### 3. Check freshness and completeness
For each source, show event date and read as-of time. Apply a `stale` label only if
the user or account policy defines a freshness rule; otherwise show elapsed time and
`Freshness assessment: Unknown`.
Mark these explicitly when absent:
- `Call objective: Unknown — ask the caller`
- `Customer objective: Unknown — ask on the call`
- `Potential objections: Unknown — no sourced objection`
- `Account health: Unknown — no configured rubric/current result`
- `Next decision: Unknown`
Do not convert missing evidence into a negative assessment.
### 4. Prepare discussion material
Discussion points must trace to a source. Suggested questions may explore an unknown,
but must be phrased without assuming the answer.
Good shape:
- **Observed:** “[dated source summary]”
- **Unknown:** “[specific missing fact]”
- **Question:** “[neutral question to resolve it]”
- **Why now:** “[link to call objective or commitment]”
Commercial responses must use current approved material. If price, ROI, rollout,
customer proof, or product support is not sourced, say `Unknown — verify before use`
and do not improvise.
### 5. Verify the brief
Before presenting:
- reconcile every commitment with its owner and due date;
- check links point to the records actually read;
- ensure dates use one stated timezone;
- ensure every quote is exact or clearly paraphrased;
- ensure no suggested objection appears as a fact;
- ensure desired outcomes are the user's stated goals, not invented intent.
## Output contract
```markdown
# Call prep: [person] — [company]
**Call:** [time and timezone]
**Brief as of:** [timestamp]
**Identity evidence:** [source/date]
**Call objective:** [user-stated source or Unknown]
## What is known
- [Fact] — [source, event date]
- [Fact] — [source, event date]
## Recent interactions
| Date | Interaction | Decisions/commitments | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
## Open commitments
| Owner | Commitment | Due/status | Source/date |
|---|---|---|---|
## Unknowns and contradictions
- [Unknown or both conflicting sources/dates]
## Questions to ask
1. [Neutral question tied to an unknown]
2. [Question tied to a sourced objective]
## Talking points
- [Sourced point, with approved claim source]
- [Unknown — verify before use]
## Desired outcome
- [User-stated goal or Unknown]
## Quick links
- [Only records actually read]
```
Placeholders define structure only; they are not sample facts.
## Controlled follow-up
After the call, offer a separate update plan. For each requested write:
1. identify the exact target;
2. show the complete before/after diff or payload;
3. separate independent writes so one approval does not authorize another;
4. require explicit human confirmation;
5. perform only the confirmed write;
6. read back and reconcile it with the preview.
On failure, keep the brief unchanged, disclose possible partial state, re-read the
target, and require a fresh preview before any retry.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!