Full SRS workflow: Brainstorm → Spec → Plan (per-section files) → User Review → SRS Generation → Validation → Improvement Report → Context Save. Use when user provides a project topic and wants a complete requirements pipeline.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add DangQuangSE/team-development-skills --skill srs-workflow --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Srs Workflow?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/dangquangse-srs-workflow-team-development-skills)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: cl:srs-flow
description: >
Full SRS workflow: Brainstorm → Spec → Plan (per-section files) → User Review
→ SRS Generation → Validation → Improvement Report → Context Save.
Use when user provides a project topic and wants a complete requirements pipeline.
user-invocable: true
metadata:
use_when: User gives a project topic/idea and wants a full SRS produced end-to-end
do_not_use_when: User only wants a quick SRS from existing requirements (use /cl:srs instead)
hard_rules: >
NEVER proceed to the next phase without explicit user confirmation.
NEVER guess or assume — if unclear, ask immediately.
NEVER truncate output — files have no word limit (SRS can be 300+ pages).
ALL questions must have answer options where possible — never open-ended only.
references:
- .claude/skills/srs-workflow/references/brainstorm-guide.md
- .claude/skills/srs-workflow/references/plan-structure-guide.md
- .claude/skills/srs-generator/references/srs-template.md
- .claude/skills/srs-generator/references/gap-detection-guide.md
---
# cl:srs-flow — Full SRS Workflow
```
Phase 0 Topic Intake
Phase 1 Deep Brainstorm ← multi-round, categorized, options-driven
Phase 2 Spec Writing ← no word limit
Phase 3 Options Gate ← user chooses next action
Phase 4 Plan Writing ← 1 .md file per SRS section
Phase 5 User Review ← iterate until approved
Phase 6 SRS Generation ← 1 .md file per section, full detail
Phase 7 Auto-Validate ← .claude/scripts/srs_validator.py
Phase 8 Improvement Report
Phase 9 Context Save
```
**Output directory:** `projects/{slug}/`
---
## Phase 0 — Topic Intake
Receive the user's topic (1 sentence to 1 paragraph). Do NOT ask questions yet.
Identify:
- Domain (e-commerce, healthcare, fintech, internal tool, SaaS, etc.)
- Scale signals (startup, enterprise, MVP, etc.)
- Any constraints mentioned
Echo back a 3-line summary:
```
Topic: {topic}
Domain: {detected domain}
Scale: {detected scale or "unknown"}
```
Then state: "Starting deep brainstorm. I will ask questions by category before writing anything."
Proceed to Phase 1.
---
## Phase 1 — Deep Brainstorm
**Hard rule: AI must not proceed to Phase 2 until it can confidently answer ALL of:**
- Who are ALL actors (primary + secondary + external systems)?
- What are ALL core features (not just mentioned ones — infer and confirm)?
- What are the explicit system boundaries (in scope / out of scope)?
- What are the technical constraints?
- What are the business rules and compliance requirements?
Load `.claude/skills/srs-workflow/references/brainstorm-guide.md` for domain-specific question sets.
### Round structure
Each round: ask ONE category of questions using `AskUserQuestion`.
Maximum 5 questions per round. Present concrete options wherever possible — never ask
open-ended questions when a multiple-choice with "Other" covers the space.
**Mandatory rounds (in order):**
**Round 1 — Actors & Users**
Ask about: primary users, secondary users, admin roles, external systems/APIs.
For each actor type: present role options with descriptions. Wait for answers.
**Round 2 — Core Features**
Present a feature checklist derived from the domain + topic.
For each feature cluster: show sub-options (e.g., authentication: email/password | OAuth | SSO | all).
Mark user selections as [CONFIRMED]. Infer likely features not mentioned — ask to confirm or reject.
Wait for answers.
**Round 3 — Scope Boundary**
Present a two-column table: proposed IN scope vs. proposed OUT scope.
Ask user to move items or add new ones. Hard-block on scope: NEVER proceed without explicit
in/out boundary.
Wait for answers.
**Round 4 — Technical Constraints**
Ask about: tech stack, hosting, existing systems to integrate, security/compliance standards,
performance targets (give numeric examples), timeline/budget signals.
Wait for answers.
**Round 5 — Business Rules & Edge Cases**
Ask about: data ownership, roles/permissions model, pricing/billing logic (if applicable),
regulatory requirements, key failure scenarios the system must handle gracefully.
Wait for answers.
**After Round 5:** Run completeness check:
- Any actor still undefined? → ask NOW before proceeding.
- Any feature with unclear scope? → ask NOW.
- Missing NFR baseline? → ask NOW.
**[GATE]** Only proceed to Phase 2 when completeness check passes with zero open items.
State: "Brainstorm complete. I now have enough information to write the spec. Proceeding."
---
## Phase 2 — Spec Writing
Write `projects/{slug}/spec.md` using the spec template structure.
**No word limit.** Write every section fully — do not summarize or truncate.
- Every actor: full description, access rights, experience level
- Every feature: stated in user's words + AI-expanded detail
- Every constraint: verbatim + implication
- In/Out scope table: exhaustive
- Business rules: numbered, precise
- NFR targets: numeric where confirmed, [TBD with context] where not
After writing, output:
```
Spec written: projects/{slug}/spec.md
Sections: §1 ... §N
Word count: ~{N}
```
Proceed to Phase 3.
---
## Phase 3 — Options Gate
Present the following menu using `AskUserQuestion`:
```
Spec is ready. What would you like to do next?
A) Write plan → break SRS into per-section plan files, then review
B) Re-read spec → show full spec.md content for review/editing
C) Adjust brainstorm → return to Phase 1 to add/change requirements
D) Jump to SRS → skip planning, generate SRS directly (not recommended)
```
Wait for user choice. Route accordingly.
B → display spec.md, then return to Phase 3.
C → return to Phase 1 Round that covers the gap.
D → skip to Phase 6.
A → proceed to Phase 4.
---
## Phase 4 — Plan Writing
Load `.claude/skills/srs-workflow/references/plan-structure-guide.md`.
Create one plan file per SRS section under `projects/{slug}/plan/`:
```
plan/
00-overview.md
01-introduction.md
02-overall-description.md
03-01-external-interfaces.md
03-02-functional-requirements.md
03-03-performance.md
03-04-database.md
03-05-design-constraints.md
03-06-system-attributes.md
03-07-other-requirements.md
appendix-a-glossary.md
appendix-b-open-issues.md
```
**For each file:**
- Write the full planned content for that SRS section
- Include: what will be written, every sub-item, FR list with "shall" stubs, NFR targets
- No word limit — plan files are the blueprint, they must be unambiguous
- Tag any item still needing user input: `[NEEDS USER INPUT: {what}]`
After all plan files are written, output a summary table:
```
| File | Section | FRs planned | NFRs planned | Open items |
|------|---------|------------|--------------|------------|
```
Proceed to Phase 5.
---
## Phase 5 — User Review
Present summary table from Phase 4. Then ask via `AskUserQuestion`:
```
Plan is ready for review. What would you like to do?
A) Approve plan → proceed to SRS generation
B) Modify section → specify which section(s) to change
C) Add features → return to Phase 1 Round 2
D) Show full plan file → specify which file to display
```
If user modifies: update the relevant plan file(s) and return to this gate.
**[GATE]** Only proceed to Phase 6 on explicit "Approve plan" (option A).
When approved, state: "Plan approved. Beginning SRS generation."
---
## Phase 6 — SRS Generation
Generate SRS section by section, each as its own file under `projects/{slug}/srs/`:
```
srs/
01-introduction.md
02-overall-description.md
03-01-external-interfaces.md
03-02-functional-requirements.md
03-03-performance.md
03-04-database.md
03-05-design-constraints.md
03-06-system-attributes.md
03-07-other-requirements.md
appendix-a-glossary.md
appendix-b-open-issues.md
```
Load and follow `.claude/skills/srs-generator/references/srs-template.md` for each section's format.
**FR format (mandatory):**
```
FR-NN [Essential|Conditional|Optional]
Requirement: The system shall {verb} {object} when {condition}.
Actor / Precondition / Given / When / Then / Source
```
**NFR format:** ISO/IEC 25023 Quality Attribute Scenario — numeric Response Measure only.
**No word limit.** Each file must be complete. A full SRS across all files may reach 300+ pages — this is normal and expected.
Also generate `projects/{slug}/srs/00-master-index.md` linking all section files with word counts.
Proceed to Phase 7.
---
## Phase 7 — Auto-Validate
Run the validator across the whole SRS directory at once:
```bash
python .claude/scripts/srs_validator.py --dir projects/{slug}/srs/
```
Output the full validation table. Then summarize:
```
## Validation Results
Overall: COMPLIANT | PARTIALLY COMPLIANT | NON-COMPLIANT
Errors: N (must fix before proceeding)
Warnings: N (captured in Phase 8 report)
```
For each ERROR: fix the affected SRS section file immediately, then re-run the validator.
Do not leave any ERROR unresolved. WARN items do not block — capture in Phase 8.
Proceed to Phase 8.
---
## Phase 8 — Improvement Report
Write `projects/{slug}/improvement-report.md`:
- **Deferred features** — items marked out-of-scope but flagged as likely future needs
- **Technical risks** — NFRs with [TBD] targets, integration unknowns, compliance gaps
- **Refinement suggestions** — FRs that could be split further, NFRs needing real load-test data
- **Next version candidates** — features users mentioned but explicitly deferred
- **Validation warnings** — WARN items from Phase 7 that should be resolved before dev
No word limit. Be specific — reference exact FR/NFR IDs, section numbers, and user quotes from brainstorm.
Proceed to Phase 9.
---
## Phase 9 — Context Save
Write `projects/{slug}/_context/`:
```
_context/
vision.md ← project goals, problem statement, success metrics
features.md ← confirmed in/out scope feature list
tech_stack.md ← confirmed tech constraints
glossary.md ← all terms defined in Appendix A
quality_standards.md← confirmed NFR numeric targets
session-notes.md ← key decisions made, open questions, next steps
```
Then output final summary:
```
Workflow complete.
Project: {name}
Location: projects/{slug}/
SRS files: {N} section files
FRs: {total FR count}
NFRs: {total NFR count}
Verdict: {COMPLIANT | PARTIALLY COMPLIANT}
Open items: {count} (see appendix-b-open-issues.md)
Next step: share projects/{slug}/srs/ with your dev team.
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!